Not making a lot of headway with them either. Sorry to be the one to tell you.I stay for the few that are not of the 'most'.
Not making a lot of headway with them either. Sorry to be the one to tell you.I stay for the few that are not of the 'most'.
I am not forcing myself on others; you are free not to read; I am not obliging you or anyone else.Sure, but in THIS place, it's limited to a handful who are here constantly. No one already a member is here to look at what you're posting, or leaving comments.
So you're not posting for them.
Again, who are you posting for?
Or is this one of your "Everyone who reads anything of the Quran must now follow the Quran or they will go to Hell" things? Liked others in Christianity who force their religion on others?
My opinion is that you're also only here because the higher ups can't be arsed to ban you, or they love poking/picking on the "Towel head".
Cause they for damn sure aren't of your faith.
So is this self-torture then?
Are you trying to be like those long ago priests who forced conversion on anyone not Christian?
What's the real reason you stick around?
I am not forcing myself on others; you are free not to read; I am not obliging you or anyone else.
So as long as I give the evidence that "there is a builder of the house, and God is the Creator of everything in the universe" and you deny this evidence and insist there is no evidence to confuse people ... I'll keep saying the evidence which you deny.
Let us know when you start giving evidence.I am not forcing myself on others; you are free not to read; I am not obliging you or anyone else.
So as long as I give the evidence that "there is a builder of the house, and God is the Creator of everything in the universe" and you deny this evidence and insist there is no evidence to confuse people ... I'll keep saying the evidence which you deny.
Your stubbornness and obstinacy are like that of the idolaters of Mecca towards God's messenger:I'm not denying anything.
I am exposing you as a liar though.
And by posting here repeatedly, and you saying that anyone who reads the Quran - regardless of whether they want to or not - they "must" convert or go to Hell.
YOU said that.
So the moment anyone "reads" any of your stuff, that's their situation, according to you.
And to add to that, you KEEP posting, about only the Quran, and nothing else, anywhere else. When everyone who has replied to you has clearly been AGAINST your belief. You aren't reaching anyone here. Yet you persist. Because you are trying to 'force' people to believe in your religion, or rather, your version of it.
Or you're a masachist and enjoy being verbally beat on by others.
And you think that by evading the evidence of the creation (that there must be a Creator of the universe), and by insisting on your 'no evidence' you can prove the atheism.He thinks just repeating the bankrupt old argument from design is evidence.
I gave you the evidence, and you keep denying it.Let us know when you start giving evidence.
You gave no evidence. You gave an argument, that if something exists it must have been created by a creator, then immediately refuted your own argument by saying that Allah exists but had no creator.I gave you the evidence, and you keep denying it.
Claiming there must be creator isn’t evidence, it’s just a belief of yours; you need evidence for that belief and the fact that the universe exists isn’t evidence for it, there are naturalistic explanations that don’t require a creator. I haven’t tried to prove atheism either, I’ve merely argued that given what I know it’s the more reasonable position.And you think that by evading the evidence of the creation (that there must be a Creator of the universe), and by insisting on your 'no evidence' you can prove the atheism.
Your stubbornness and obstinacy are like that of the idolaters of Mecca towards God's messenger:
I said: A constructed house should have its builder, and the universe with its systems, there must be a Builder or Creator Who created it.Claiming there must be creator isn’t evidence, it’s just a belief of yours; you need evidence for that belief and the fact that the universe exists isn’t evidence for it, there are naturalistic explanations that don’t require a creator. I haven’t tried to prove atheism either, I’ve merely argued that given what I know it’s the more reasonable position.
And by posting here repeatedly, and you saying that anyone who reads the Quran - regardless of whether they want to or not - they "must" convert or go to Hell.
YOU said that.
True, I said this, and I say it and will say it, God willing.
Why must that be so? That's your conclusion, but it's not the only possible one. I refer you to the book A Universe From Nothing by the distinguished physicist Lawrence M. Krause. I could with equal plausibility argue that the creator must also have had a creator, who must also have had a creator, etc. The essence of Dr. Krause's thesis is there is something rather than nothing because "nothing" in that meaning, according to what we understand of quantum theory, is unstable, something is going to appear.I said: A constructed house should have its builder, and the universe with its systems, there must be a Builder or Creator Who created it.
They indicate nothing of the sort, again that's not the only possible conclusion from the evidence, and where multiple conclusions are possible, you don't get to just pick the one you like, you have to await further evidence.2- The law of physics inserted in the entire universe indicate One God Who applicated them in this way.
Sure it can. The best current evidence suggests that's exactly what happened, and there are plausible, testable explanations for how it happened. Your inability to grasp that is just a failure of your understanding and imagination.3- It can't be this marvelous universe with its systems and laws came into existence spontaneously.
I'm not suggesting taking them blindly, the scientists have made the case pretty well, as you might know if you'd read anything other than the Quran and Al-Hilly's interpretation of it. Modern science has gone way past both of you, and somehow it also seems worth noting here that every religiously derived cosmology has been proven wrong, and not just a little bit, but hugely, egregiously wrong. Science has shown reality to be grand and complex far beyond anything humans ever imagined, and we didn't discover that by reading scriptures.Moreover, "there are naturalistic explanations"... why should anyone take these blindly? Saying there are scientists and naturalists thinking in this way .. and we follow them on the pretext they are scientists?
If you evade this point, there can be no discussion with you.Why must that be so? That's your conclusion, but it's not the only possible one.
Now, you start referring to others, which is your mistake.I refer you to the book A Universe From Nothing by the distinguished physicist Lawrence M. Krause.
This is another point, to which we replied before.I could with equal plausibility argue that the creator must also have had a creator, who must also have had a creator, etc.
Dr. Krause and Dawkins are in extreme wrong, and you follow them in their mistakes.The essence of Dr. Krause's thesis is there is something rather than nothing because "nothing" in that meaning, according to what we understand of quantum theory, is unstable, something is going to appear.
And you got called out for a logical fallacy.I said: A constructed house should have its builder, and the universe with its systems, there must be a Builder or Creator Who created it.
Uh no, they don't. Clearly you don't understand physics or scientific laws.2- The law of physics inserted in the entire universe indicate One God Who applicated them in this way.
Why not?3- It can't be this marvelous universe with its systems and laws came into existence spontaneously.
As opposed to following a pedophile who enjoyed hallucinogens and "saw god"? Scientist provide evidence for their claims. When new information is learned scientific claims are adjusted for the new evidence. All you do is repeat the same bullshit ad nauseum and act like you've provided irrefutable proof.Moreover, "there are naturalistic explanations"... why should anyone take these blindly? Saying there are scientists and naturalists thinking in this way .. and we follow them on the pretext they are scientists?
And you, who read nothing but the Quran and Al-Hilly’s wildly erroneous claims, think you’re in a position to correct centuries of careful scientific work by some of the smartest people who’ve ever lived? Your religious beliefs have made you arrogant and ignorant, and closed your mind to reality. You’re obviously not stupid, but you might as well be for all the difference that makes. Science works, regardless of what you want to believe, and revelation is not a path to useful knowledge about it.Dr. Krause and Dawkins are in extreme wrong, and you follow them in their mistakes.