There is the evidence.

Torch light

House Member
Dec 4, 2017
3,546
155
63
Sure, but in THIS place, it's limited to a handful who are here constantly. No one already a member is here to look at what you're posting, or leaving comments.

So you're not posting for them.

Again, who are you posting for?

Or is this one of your "Everyone who reads anything of the Quran must now follow the Quran or they will go to Hell" things? Liked others in Christianity who force their religion on others?

My opinion is that you're also only here because the higher ups can't be arsed to ban you, or they love poking/picking on the "Towel head".

Cause they for damn sure aren't of your faith.

So is this self-torture then?

Are you trying to be like those long ago priests who forced conversion on anyone not Christian?

What's the real reason you stick around?
I am not forcing myself on others; you are free not to read; I am not obliging you or anyone else.
So as long as I give the evidence that "there is a builder of the house, and God is the Creator of everything in the universe" and you deny this evidence and insist there is no evidence to confuse people ... I'll keep saying the evidence which you deny.
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,034
2,420
113
New Brunswick
I am not forcing myself on others; you are free not to read; I am not obliging you or anyone else.
So as long as I give the evidence that "there is a builder of the house, and God is the Creator of everything in the universe" and you deny this evidence and insist there is no evidence to confuse people ... I'll keep saying the evidence which you deny.

I'm not denying anything.

I am exposing you as a liar though.

And by posting here repeatedly, and you saying that anyone who reads the Quran - regardless of whether they want to or not - they "must" convert or go to Hell.

YOU said that.

So the moment anyone "reads" any of your stuff, that's their situation, according to you.

And to add to that, you KEEP posting, about only the Quran, and nothing else, anywhere else. When everyone who has replied to you has clearly been AGAINST your belief. You aren't reaching anyone here. Yet you persist. Because you are trying to 'force' people to believe in your religion, or rather, your version of it.

Or you're a masachist and enjoy being verbally beat on by others.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
58,096
8,345
113
Washington DC
I am not forcing myself on others; you are free not to read; I am not obliging you or anyone else.
So as long as I give the evidence that "there is a builder of the house, and God is the Creator of everything in the universe" and you deny this evidence and insist there is no evidence to confuse people ... I'll keep saying the evidence which you deny.
Let us know when you start giving evidence.
 

Torch light

House Member
Dec 4, 2017
3,546
155
63
I'm not denying anything.

I am exposing you as a liar though.

And by posting here repeatedly, and you saying that anyone who reads the Quran - regardless of whether they want to or not - they "must" convert or go to Hell.

YOU said that.

So the moment anyone "reads" any of your stuff, that's their situation, according to you.

And to add to that, you KEEP posting, about only the Quran, and nothing else, anywhere else. When everyone who has replied to you has clearly been AGAINST your belief. You aren't reaching anyone here. Yet you persist. Because you are trying to 'force' people to believe in your religion, or rather, your version of it.

Or you're a masachist and enjoy being verbally beat on by others.
Your stubbornness and obstinacy are like that of the idolaters of Mecca towards God's messenger:

Quran 41: 5, which means:
(And they say [to Our messenger]:
"Our hearts are inside shells, [concealed] from such [monotheism] to which you invite us,
in our ears is deafness,
and between us and you is a barrier;
so do [whatever you like; for] we are doing [plots against you.]
)

quran-ayat.com/pret/41.htm#a41_5
 

Torch light

House Member
Dec 4, 2017
3,546
155
63
He thinks just repeating the bankrupt old argument from design is evidence.
And you think that by evading the evidence of the creation (that there must be a Creator of the universe), and by insisting on your 'no evidence' you can prove the atheism.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
And you think that by evading the evidence of the creation (that there must be a Creator of the universe), and by insisting on your 'no evidence' you can prove the atheism.
Claiming there must be creator isn’t evidence, it’s just a belief of yours; you need evidence for that belief and the fact that the universe exists isn’t evidence for it, there are naturalistic explanations that don’t require a creator. I haven’t tried to prove atheism either, I’ve merely argued that given what I know it’s the more reasonable position.
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,034
2,420
113
New Brunswick
Your stubbornness and obstinacy are like that of the idolaters of Mecca towards God's messenger:

Well, I am what God made me.


And while I have no issue with Islam in general, nor really Mohammed himself (well, on some things; others I have big issues with) you on the other hand are not exactly the spokesperson your religion needs.

And if being stubborn against your lies damns me by your version of God, well that's fine, since I wouldn't follow him anyway.
 

Torch light

House Member
Dec 4, 2017
3,546
155
63
Claiming there must be creator isn’t evidence, it’s just a belief of yours; you need evidence for that belief and the fact that the universe exists isn’t evidence for it, there are naturalistic explanations that don’t require a creator. I haven’t tried to prove atheism either, I’ve merely argued that given what I know it’s the more reasonable position.
I said: A constructed house should have its builder, and the universe with its systems, there must be a Builder or Creator Who created it.
2- The law of physics inserted in the entire universe indicate One God Who applicated them in this way.
3- It can't be this marvelous universe with its systems and laws came into existence spontaneously.

Moreover, "there are naturalistic explanations"... why should anyone take these blindly? Saying there are scientists and naturalists thinking in this way .. and we follow them on the pretext they are scientists?
 
Last edited:

Torch light

House Member
Dec 4, 2017
3,546
155
63
And by posting here repeatedly, and you saying that anyone who reads the Quran - regardless of whether they want to or not - they "must" convert or go to Hell.

YOU said that.

True, I said this, and I say it and will say it, God willing.
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,034
2,420
113
New Brunswick
True, I said this, and I say it and will say it, God willing.

Then you deserve no pity, for there is no help for you. You are as pathetic as any Christian of the past who tried to force the world to convert to their faith. You are as bad as the Crusaders. As the Missionaries. As the Popes, as all of them.

Because you are EXACTLY like them, only using Islam as your religion of choice.

You lie.

You "Force" your religion onto people, then blame them if they do not convert.

You post cherry-picked ayat's as if that proves anything, which it does not.

You are the LAST type of person Islam needs to be out in the world.

You are no better than the Terrorists, the Taliban.

If you are insulted; Good.

If you're angry; Good.

Because in the end, you are NOT representing God - any God - but your own bastardization of God and making a fool out of yourself in the process. I will no longer consider being respectful, as I have tried to be, nor even serious about your posts. You are a stain on Islam and people like you ruin it so people like those on this board treat it like it's garbage. That is on YOU, not the "disbelievers" or "Atheists", "Zionists", or whoever else you want to blame. It's YOU, not anyone else.

May you someday realize it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dexter Sinister

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
I said: A constructed house should have its builder, and the universe with its systems, there must be a Builder or Creator Who created it.
Why must that be so? That's your conclusion, but it's not the only possible one. I refer you to the book A Universe From Nothing by the distinguished physicist Lawrence M. Krause. I could with equal plausibility argue that the creator must also have had a creator, who must also have had a creator, etc. The essence of Dr. Krause's thesis is there is something rather than nothing because "nothing" in that meaning, according to what we understand of quantum theory, is unstable, something is going to appear.
2- The law of physics inserted in the entire universe indicate One God Who applicated them in this way.
They indicate nothing of the sort, again that's not the only possible conclusion from the evidence, and where multiple conclusions are possible, you don't get to just pick the one you like, you have to await further evidence.
3- It can't be this marvelous universe with its systems and laws came into existence spontaneously.
Sure it can. The best current evidence suggests that's exactly what happened, and there are plausible, testable explanations for how it happened. Your inability to grasp that is just a failure of your understanding and imagination.
Moreover, "there are naturalistic explanations"... why should anyone take these blindly? Saying there are scientists and naturalists thinking in this way .. and we follow them on the pretext they are scientists?
I'm not suggesting taking them blindly, the scientists have made the case pretty well, as you might know if you'd read anything other than the Quran and Al-Hilly's interpretation of it. Modern science has gone way past both of you, and somehow it also seems worth noting here that every religiously derived cosmology has been proven wrong, and not just a little bit, but hugely, egregiously wrong. Science has shown reality to be grand and complex far beyond anything humans ever imagined, and we didn't discover that by reading scriptures.
 

Torch light

House Member
Dec 4, 2017
3,546
155
63
Why must that be so? That's your conclusion, but it's not the only possible one.
If you evade this point, there can be no discussion with you.
Anyone can keep saying to any proof: this is not possible.
No, there must be a creator and a maker to everything and a mover for any movement, and a worker of every work.
I refer you to the book A Universe From Nothing by the distinguished physicist Lawrence M. Krause.
Now, you start referring to others, which is your mistake.
I could with equal plausibility argue that the creator must also have had a creator, who must also have had a creator, etc.
This is another point, to which we replied before.
The essence of Dr. Krause's thesis is there is something rather than nothing because "nothing" in that meaning, according to what we understand of quantum theory, is unstable, something is going to appear.
Dr. Krause and Dawkins are in extreme wrong, and you follow them in their mistakes.
 

Torch light

House Member
Dec 4, 2017
3,546
155
63
God's work:

What we see in the universe around us is the work of God the Creator and Almighty.
E.g. we see the planets move in their orbits around the sun: why shouldn't they escape into the outer space? Because God bound them with the gravity laws and the repelling force and other physical laws that He inserted in the universe.
Quran 35: 41, which means:
(God holds the heavens and the earth [: the planets and the earth, with the gravity power of the sun]; in order that they do not escape [from it and scatter in the space.]
And if they were to escape [the gravity of the sun], no one else than He could hold them.
He is Ever-Clement [and] Most Forgiving.
)
http://quran-ayat.com/pret/35.htm#a35_41

The illusion of many people in the West (and the East) is that they imagine God as a huge man hiding somewhere in the sky.. which is their wrong misconception: God is beyond the imagination of any creature; He is not like any material or spiritual creature.
This illusion came from the distorted Torah of Ezra in which God was described in this way that He made man in His likeness.
While in the Glorious Quran, there is no creature like God.

Quran 42: 11, which means:
(There is not, as His likeness, anything [material or spiritual]; He is the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing.)
http://quran-ayat.com/pret/41.htm#a41_11

And in another Quran revelation, God cannot be seen by the sight of eyes:
Quran 6: 103, which means:
(Sights do not perceive Him, but He perceives sights, and He is the Compassionate [about His servants], the Well-Aware [about His creatures.])
quran-ayat.com/pret/6.htm#a6_103

Moreover, God is Eternal, He is the First and the Last; He is above having any son or parents, and He is above having any wife, and is above having any associate with Him in the ownership and kingdom, and there is no equal to Him.
 
Last edited:

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,253
5,879
113
Olympus Mons
I said: A constructed house should have its builder, and the universe with its systems, there must be a Builder or Creator Who created it.
And you got called out for a logical fallacy.
2- The law of physics inserted in the entire universe indicate One God Who applicated them in this way.
Uh no, they don't. Clearly you don't understand physics or scientific laws.
3- It can't be this marvelous universe with its systems and laws came into existence spontaneously.
Why not?
Moreover, "there are naturalistic explanations"... why should anyone take these blindly? Saying there are scientists and naturalists thinking in this way .. and we follow them on the pretext they are scientists?
As opposed to following a pedophile who enjoyed hallucinogens and "saw god"? Scientist provide evidence for their claims. When new information is learned scientific claims are adjusted for the new evidence. All you do is repeat the same bullshit ad nauseum and act like you've provided irrefutable proof.

"All things have a creator, except Allah". Wrong, WE created the gods, it wasn't the other way around. We are evolution's slave, chosen by coincidence.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Dr. Krause and Dawkins are in extreme wrong, and you follow them in their mistakes.
And you, who read nothing but the Quran and Al-Hilly’s wildly erroneous claims, think you’re in a position to correct centuries of careful scientific work by some of the smartest people who’ve ever lived? Your religious beliefs have made you arrogant and ignorant, and closed your mind to reality. You’re obviously not stupid, but you might as well be for all the difference that makes. Science works, regardless of what you want to believe, and revelation is not a path to useful knowledge about it.