There is no such thing as "climate science"

[BornRuff]

I not arguing anything. I'm stating fact.


Are you high?

Lol, again, personal attacks are always the mark of someone who is winning an argument.

If you are not arguing against anything, what the hell is this thread about?

Where exactly did you find any mention of "agronomists, psychologists and economists"?

 

[petros]

Did you peruse the list of self proclaimed "climate scientists" from a climate science program referred to and linked to repeatedly as suggested to be able to follow along? Yes or no?

 

[BornRuff]

Did you peruse the list of self proclaimed "climate scientists" from a climate science program referred to and linked to repeatedly as suggested to be able to follow along? Yes or no?

Can you try to speak English?

 

[DaSleeper]

Did you peruse the list of self proclaimed "climate scientists" from a climate science program referred to and linked to repeatedly as suggested to be able to follow along? Yes or no?

Here it is again .....reposted..again
Climate Science Program: Iowa State University


Betcha he won't see it or acknowledge it.....
Can't open an ideologue's closed mind......

 

[Locutus]

Can't open an ideologue's closed mind......

there must be a reason he came to us from redflagdeals. ;-)

 

[Tonington]

Lots of 'Climate Science' programs:

National Center for Atmospheric Research | RAL | Climate Science and Applications Program
CSUN Climate Science Program: Home
CREATE - NSERC Training Program in Climate Science
Welcome - Climate Science and Solutions - Northern Arizona University
Scripps- Climate Sciences Doctoral Program
California Department of Fish and Wildlife- Climate Science Program
University of Bern - Graduate School of Climate Sciences
Workshop on Climate Science Program | School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences

It's interdisciplinary. What's there to argue about? Some climate science programs have focuses on topics like adaptation, and that can involve social sciences, agronomists, agrologists, and all sorts of experts from different fields.

If there is no such thing, then there wouldn't be academic programs. You can't just make them disappear, and institutions like Scripps, or the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder are not fringe schools.

Much ado about nothing. Have a beer and chill out.

 

[petros]

You do need sessions with a self proclaimed climate scientist/psychologist. Noooo doubt about it.

It's a dead ring at 97% consenus.

Interdisciplinary? Uh huh.

And you'd defend a climate scientist/ufologist's word to the death wouldn't you?

Why don't the trades get into this?

Would the word of a climate scientist/plumber be golden too?

 

[BornRuff]

Here it is again .....reposted..again
Climate Science Program: Iowa State University

Betcha he won't see it or acknowledge it.....
Can't open an ideologue's closed mind......

Lol, not acknowledge it? I am the one who directed him to that link originally.

What he is trying to "prove" with it is ridiculous though. He himself claimed that there is no formal definition of the term.

You do need sessions with a self proclaimed climate scientist/psychologist. Noooo doubt about it.

It's a dead ring at 97% consenus.

Interdisciplinary? Uh huh.

And you'd defend a climate scientist/ufologist's word to the death wouldn't you?

Why don't the trades get into this?

Would the word of a climate scientist/plumber be golden too?

Lol, see! He keeps attacking this 97% number by attacking completely unrelated lists of people. If you have a problem with that study, show me who was counted in that study.

 

[petros]

If there was ever somebody in need of a climate plumber it's you BumFluff.

 

[BornRuff]

If there was ever somebody in need of a climate plumber it's you BumFluff.

Lol, so that is who you claimed they counted in the 97%?

Do you have anything to link anyone in the lists you have posted to the 97% number other than word association?

A word that you know isn't formally defined?

 

[petros]

Me claim the 97%¿ Hell no. Tonington likes to use that one. I think he got it from a climate scientist/custodian at the mall.

 

[BornRuff]

Me claim the 97%¿ Hell no. Tonington likes to use that one. I think he got it from a climate scientist/custodian at the mall.

Lol, you just referenced it in your last two posts.

 

[petros]

You have no idea what a jab is?

 

[Tonington]

Interdisciplinary?

Yes. You know, when a group of researchers from different fields combine approaches to work on a subject. What impact does climate change have on cold-water species? Could involve, marine biologists, zoologists, oceanographers, bio-statisticians, econometricians, pathologists, and ecologists. To name just a few.

 

[BornRuff]

You have no idea what a jab is?

Is that you way of justifying the 30+ posts trying to "refute" a specific study without having to take ownership of your nonsensical methods?

 

[Tonington]

Me claim the 97%¿ Hell no. Tonington likes to use that one. I think he got it from a climate scientist/custodian at the mall.

I'm actually more partial to the 97% of published papers that support the anthropogenic cause of climate change than of the 97% of surveyed scientists. The 97% figure for published research is more appropriate. A scientist who has published 900 papers carries more weight than one who has published 1.

 

[petros]

Yes. You know, when a group of researchers from different fields combine approaches to work on a subject. What impact date change have on cold-water species? Could involve, marine biologists, zoologists, oceanographers, bio-statisticians, econometricians, pathologists, and ecologists. To name just a few.

Where would the psychologist fit in on studying a cold water species?

Published papers? I'm glad you brought it up.

Right right right.Or it could be bakers, cab drivers, hockey players, and stay at home moms since pretty much anyone can write a climate paper and dub themself a climate scientist once all the other bakers, cab drivers, hockey players and stay at home moms peer review it.

Wake up man.

 

[BornRuff]

Where would the psychologist fit in on studying a cold water species?

Published papers? I'm glad you brought it up.

Right right right.Or it could be bakers, cab drivers, hockey players, and stay at home moms since pretty much anyone can write a climate paper and dub themself a climate scientist once all the other bakers, cab drivers, hockey players and stay at home moms peer review it.

Wake up man.

If you think it is so easy to get a peer reviewed paper published, what does that say about that study you referenced where people who don't publish are the largest group of respondents?

An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

 

[petros]

Why do you need to be published to be heard as a scientist.

It's a "peer reviewed fact" that there is a 36% AGW consensus amongst geophysists.

What have you heard from the 64% in disagreement?

Why haven't you heard anything from the holy grail of earth sciences? Stymied?

 

[BornRuff]

Why do you need to be published to be heard as a scientist.

It's a "peer reviewed fact" that there is a 36% AGW consensus amongst geophysists.

What have you heard from the 64% in disagreement?

Why haven't you heard anything from the holy grail of earth sciences? Stymied?

Where are you getting that number from?

You have to be published in a peer reviewed journal to be taken seriously because otherwise there are no checks to make sure that your research or analysis is credible and accurate.