The OFFICIAL Trump Travel Ban Thread

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
Re: 9th Circuit Court declines to quickly reinstate TRAVEL ban

more buffoonary:

President Donald Trump stepped up his criticism of the U.S. judiciary on Wednesday, saying courts seem to be “so political,” a day after his U.S. travel ban on people from seven Muslim-majority countries faced close scrutiny from an appeals court.

Trump calls courts
 

eh1eh

Blah Blah Blah
Aug 31, 2006
10,749
103
48
Under a Lone Palm
Re: 9th Circuit Court declines to quickly reinstate TRAVEL ban

more buffoonary:

President Donald Trump stepped up his criticism of the U.S. judiciary on Wednesday, saying courts seem to be “so political,” a day after his U.S. travel ban on people from seven Muslim-majority countries faced close scrutiny from an appeals court.

Trump calls courts


What a dumb a$$. Of course administering the country is political.
This guy just keeps getting dumber everyday. Or it appears that way at least.
He may have ulterior motives. Maybe.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
Re: 9th Circuit Court declines to quickly reinstate TRAVEL ban

Wwatts da mattawr boys. Due process and democracy spoiling your smugfest?

I'm somewhat surprised at how blatant the Trumpites are in their disdain for democracy, rule of law and liberty. I knew that disdain existed but they always tried to hide it before.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Re: 9th Circuit Court declines to quickly reinstate TRAVEL ban

He's within his rights, in fact is oath obligated, to protect the U.S. to best of his abilities.
If that were really what he was doing, the list of countries would have included Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Pakistan, and Nigeria.
 

eh1eh

Blah Blah Blah
Aug 31, 2006
10,749
103
48
Under a Lone Palm
Re: 9th Circuit Court declines to quickly reinstate TRAVEL ban

If that were really what he was doing, the list of countries would have included Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Pakistan, and Nigeria.

You're a brave and logical man bringing real facts to the table in this matter. ;)

I'm somewhat surprised at how blatant the Trumpites are in their disdain for democracy, rule of law and liberty. I knew that disdain existed but they always tried to hide it before.


Well I guess power has its privileges if you're willing to unethically exploit them.
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
Re: 9th Circuit Court declines to quickly reinstate TRAVEL ban

. He's within his rights, in fact is oath obligated, to protect the U.S. to best of his abilities.


If that were really what he was doing, the list of countries would have included Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Pakistan, and Nigeria.


Well it does state to the BEST OF HIS ABILITIES...maybe it is the best he can do.
 

davesmom

Council Member
Oct 11, 2015
2,084
0
36
Southern Ontario
Re: 9th Circuit Court declines to quickly reinstate TRAVEL ban

Trump shouldn't criticize the Judges. It's below the office of President to do so. Discretion is the better part of valour!
But he is right nevertheless. Judges are political. They are supposed to make ruling according to the law. So if they do that, explain how a panel of eight judges can split 4 to 4 on a decision. Obviously, someone there is not ruling by the letter of the law.
Explain why there is emphasis on appointing a Democratic or Republican Judge. Obviously, so their personal leanings will be in line with the party.
It's ridiculous to believe that judges' personal views do not influence their decisions.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
Bill Clinton Says In 1995 What Trump Says Today On Immigration



the whole system is breaking down man. :lol:


While former President Bill Clinton’s 1995 speech on illegal immigration got a standing ovation when he used the same talking points as Republican nominee Donald Trump, Trump’s Arizona speech Wednesday got him called a racist.


Clinton gave a State of the Union address where he said all Americans were disturbed by the amount of illegal immigrants in the country. He noted the burdens they put on the tax payers before vowing to crack down aggressively.


“That’s why our administration has moved to aggressively secure our borders more, by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as every before, by cracking down on illegal hiring, by barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens,” Clinton said.


Clinton received a standing ovation for his remarks.




more


Bill Praised For Using Same Points As Trump On Immigration | The Daily Caller


 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
Re: Trump's Executive Order Remains in Place

US appeals court rules against Trump's travel ban

SAN FRANCISCO (NEWS1130) – A federal appeals court in San Francisco has unanimously ruled to uphold the suspension of US President Donald Trump’s travel ban.

The three-judge panel of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday said Washington state proved it had the legal right to bring the lawsuit over the ban by alleging its universities would suffer harm — one of the questions that the judges considered.

Universities have complained about students and faculty being stranded overseas.

US District Judge James Robart, in Seattle, issued a temporary restraining order halting the ban last week after Washington state and Minnesota sued. The ban temporarily suspended the nation’s refugee program and immigration from seven predominantly Muslim countries that have raised terrorism concerns.

Justice Department lawyers appealed to the 9th Circuit, arguing that the president has the constitutional power to restrict entry to the United States and that the courts cannot second-guess his determination that such a step was needed to prevent terrorism.

The states said Trump’s travel ban harmed individuals, businesses and universities. Citing Trump’s campaign promise to stop Muslims from entering the U.S., they said the ban unconstitutionally blocked entry to people based on religion.

Both sides faced tough questioning during an hour of arguments Tuesday conducted by phone — an unusual step that was broadcast live on cable networks, newspaper websites and social media. It attracted a huge audience.

The judges hammered away at the Trump administration’s claim that the ban was motivated by terrorism fears, but they also challenged the states’ argument that it targeted Muslims.

US appeals court rules against Trump's travel ban - NEWS 1130
 

Durry

House Member
May 18, 2010
4,709
286
83
Canada
Re: Trump's Executive Order Remains in Place

Too bad Trump lost this round.

He will have to put in a very tough immigration policy to keep scum out of his country.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,193
14,246
113
Low Earth Orbit
Re: Bill Clinton Says In 1995 What Trump Says Today On Immigration

Hi Trumpette. 2 more months and you can lick bicycle seats instead of sniffing crotches.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Trump loses Muslim Ban Suspension Appeal: 'SEE YOU IN COURT'



Trump responds to ruling on travel ban: 'SEE YOU IN COURT'

WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump said Thursday's federal appellate court ruling against reinstating his refugee and immigration order was a "political decision" that jeopardized national security.

"We have a situation where the security of our country is at stake and it's a very, very serious situation so we look forward ... to seeing them in court," Trump said. "We're going to win the case."

Trump, in a brief, impromptu appearance in the West Wing, did not specify what his administration's next legal steps would be and said he had not yet conferred with Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who was sworn into office earlier Thursday.

The president said he did not believe the decision undercut his presidency.

In a unanimous decision, the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined Thursday to block a lower-court ruling that suspended the executive order preventing travellers from seven Muslim-majority nations from entering the U.S.

The Justice Department said it was "reviewing the decision and considering its options." It could appeal the judge's restraining order to the U.S. Supreme Court or it could attempt to make the case for the travel ban in the district court.

White House counsellor Kellyanne Conway suggested the next step would be to argue the merits of the executive order.

"The statute provides a president ... with great latitude and authority to protect the citizens and to protect the nation's national security," Conway said. "This was not argued on the merits. Now that we'll have an opportunity to argue on the merits we look forward to doing that. We look forward to prevailing."

The ruling represented a setback for Trump's administration and the second legal defeat for the new president in the past week. Trump's decision to sign the executive order late last month has sparked protests at airports around the world as authorities barred scores of travellers from entering the country amid confusion over how to implement the details.

The appellate decision brushed aside arguments by the Justice Department that the president has the constitutional power to restrict entry to the United States and that the courts cannot second-guess his determination that such a step was needed to prevent terrorism.

Trump responds to ruling on travel ban: 'SEE YOU IN COURT' | CTV News
 
Last edited: