The OFFICIAL Trump Travel Ban Thread
- Thread starter EagleSmack
- Start date
Re: Travelers arrive in US to hugs and tears after ban is lifted
I don't think the US is on there.
I don't think the US is on there.
Re: Travelers arrive in US to hugs and tears after ban is lifted
I already told you America isn't on the list.
I already told you America isn't on the list.
Re: Travelers arrive in US to hugs and tears after ban is lifted
You're having trouble with this whole posting thing.
American education at work.
You're having trouble with this whole posting thing.
American education at work.
Re: Travelers arrive in US to hugs and tears after ban is lifted
He failed.
The immigrants won.
He failed.
The immigrants won.
Re: Giuliani confirms order to carry out a 'Muslim Ban'
How Trump's 'Muslim ban' comments can hurt him in court - CNNPolitics.com
How Trump's 'Muslim ban' comments can hurt him in court - CNNPolitics.com
Re: Travelers arrive in US to hugs and tears after ban is lifted
We're all allowed in right now.
We're all allowed in right now.
Re: Giuliani confirms order to carry out a 'Muslim Ban'
Do you need some attention?
Ludlow are you feeling left out?
Do you need some attention?
Ludlow do u have your teeth in?
Re: Giuliani confirms order to carry out a 'Muslim Ban'
He sniffed too much thermite at WTC.
Re: Giuliani confirms order to carry out a 'Muslim Ban'
Another example of people staying on way beyond their time
Re: 9th Circuit Court declines to quickly reinstate TRAVEL ban
Whatever you think of the ban itself, Seattle U.S. District Judge James Robart's ruling was a vast over reach of judicial powers. He had not the fiduciary or geographic responsibility or oversight to overturn this Executive Order. From this isolated, local bench he legislated national and foreign policy, and gave standing to individuals who are not included in the U.S. Constitution (ie foreign prospective asylum seekers). This are determined by executive branch policy, not any contrived 'right'.
It was a blatant entry by the courts into executive privilege on top of the decades long effort to usurp legislative privilege, by implementing laws from the bench. It completely tilts the finely tuned checks and balances of the U.S. Constitution in favour of one branch.. and signals the onset of a judicial tyranny.. as we've seen imposed on us in Canada.
The 9th Circuit is notoriously activist and liberal, but i think ultimately the Supreme Court will return the Constitutionally directed powers to the Presidency. He's within his rights, in fact is oath obligated, to protect the U.S. to best of his abilities. You wouldn't want these unelected, crackpot, post-structural justices responsible for that. The U.S. is in the throws of Judicial Coup d'Etat.
Certainly some sensible USSC appointments, of judicial constructivists, who respect the original text & structure and the limitations of their own branch, of the U.S. Constitution, like Neil Gorsuch, could return some balance and equity to the three branches. But having the U.S. ruled by some intellectually sloppy & mediocre judge in Seattle, is a prescription for chaos and dictatorship.
Whatever you think of the ban itself, Seattle U.S. District Judge James Robart's ruling was a vast over reach of judicial powers. He had not the fiduciary or geographic responsibility or oversight to overturn this Executive Order. From this isolated, local bench he legislated national and foreign policy, and gave standing to individuals who are not included in the U.S. Constitution (ie foreign prospective asylum seekers). This are determined by executive branch policy, not any contrived 'right'.
It was a blatant entry by the courts into executive privilege on top of the decades long effort to usurp legislative privilege, by implementing laws from the bench. It completely tilts the finely tuned checks and balances of the U.S. Constitution in favour of one branch.. and signals the onset of a judicial tyranny.. as we've seen imposed on us in Canada.
The 9th Circuit is notoriously activist and liberal, but i think ultimately the Supreme Court will return the Constitutionally directed powers to the Presidency. He's within his rights, in fact is oath obligated, to protect the U.S. to best of his abilities. You wouldn't want these unelected, crackpot, post-structural justices responsible for that. The U.S. is in the throws of Judicial Coup d'Etat.
Certainly some sensible USSC appointments, of judicial constructivists, who respect the original text & structure and the limitations of their own branch, of the U.S. Constitution, like Neil Gorsuch, could return some balance and equity to the three branches. But having the U.S. ruled by some intellectually sloppy & mediocre judge in Seattle, is a prescription for chaos and dictatorship.
Last edited:
Re: 9th Circuit Court declines to quickly reinstate TRAVEL ban
The President of the United States should not have to take judges to court. If he had exceeded his power it would be different, but he didn't, whether the ban is seen as right or wrong by this judge (and most of the world), he is by extension showing the world that the US is 'out of control' since it's clear that the President (in the current law) was in his full right to order this crazy ban. The Army and US National Security cannot be second guessing their Commander in Chief, it's damaging to moral. Remove him from the White House or let him be President.
The President of the United States should not have to take judges to court. If he had exceeded his power it would be different, but he didn't, whether the ban is seen as right or wrong by this judge (and most of the world), he is by extension showing the world that the US is 'out of control' since it's clear that the President (in the current law) was in his full right to order this crazy ban. The Army and US National Security cannot be second guessing their Commander in Chief, it's damaging to moral. Remove him from the White House or let him be President.
Re: 9th Circuit Court declines to quickly reinstate TRAVEL ban
Wwatts da mattawr boys. Due process and democracy spoiling your smugfest?
Hahahahahahaha!
Cosewrative tewrs.
(I think I'm getting the Eaglesmack troll thing down)
Wwatts da mattawr boys. Due process and democracy spoiling your smugfest?
Hahahahahahaha!
Cosewrative tewrs.
(I think I'm getting the Eaglesmack troll thing down)