The Crimean referendum?

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
58,058
8,327
113
Washington DC
It looks to me like Putin has the upper hand here.
The west is just wagging it's finger threatening sanctions etc, but I don't think Putin gives a sh^t what the west says, it's holding the better hand and it could be that it will now start to take over Ukraine or parts of it.
Putin certainly has the support of our Obama-haters.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
"The Supreme Council of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea... declares Crimea an independent sovereign state -- the Republic of Crimea," the document said.
It said that from Monday, Ukrainian laws would no longer apply in Crimea and decisions taken by the Ukrainian state since the ouster of Kremlin-backed president Viktor Yanukovych last month had no authority.
Crimea Declares Independence from Ukraine, Applies to Join Russia — Naharnet
What would the maritime borders look like for the Republic of Crimea look like? Those latest laws would also apply to the rest of the Ukraine in that they are not an elected Govt so Crimea can move ahead and get lots of money from Russia and the rest of the Ukraine can't do anything until they have a voted in Govt which is a few months down the road. This vote also shows the huge delays the US does when doing things is intentional, as is the vote in the Ukraine and the time Syria was given to start getting rid of their chemical weapons, the US gave them 6 months, with Russia's 'help' Syria was ready to ship them to a location once the boats were there to take the stuff away, those still haven't all arrived even though they are US war ships.

The international community? What a load of sh it. The so called international community is very select, bankers and corporations.
Lets see how many at the UN buck the US by recognizing Crimea as being independent., that could be a telling point for what happens in the near future.

Putin certainly has the support of our Obama-haters.
Post the current approval ratings of the two leaders, lets see which crowd is 'bigger' your side or the right side.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
Compare the choices of the Quebec sovereignty ballot with that of the referendum in Crimea. Oh and the oversight of the elections, ahem machine guns.

Outside the voting booths, not in them. Still secret ballot. Besides, it would backfire big time if some other referendum shows the opposite result, so I'm sure Russia would be careful not to mess with that. Heck even the people in the streets were convinced they'd win.

You kinda gotta hand it to Putin, he got what he wanted without any bloodshed.

Maybe the West should learn, there are different ways of taking over countries without having to revert to blazing guns!!

Putin did his homework before stormin' in guns ablazin'.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,794
460
83
The crux of this whole issue seems to be the legitimacy of this referendum.

Russia sends tanks in to 'protect' people but the rest of the world thinks it was a means to influence a vote.


If there is evidence that there was no such influence, then Putin could be justified. If there is clear evidence that this was a military offensive, then the rest of the world is right.

In any case, people are playing politics with this uncertainty.

The worst example being these American right wingers who would support a friggin communist regime just because they don't like the guy that's currently in power in the U.S.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,338
1,799
113
Where was the world's outrage when Quebec held a referendum? Ontario should have been busing people in that would have helped them separate rather than the other way around.


I'm assuming that referendum (which the pro-Canadians just about won by the skin of their teeth) was legal. The Crimean one isn't.

You kinda gotta hand it to Putin, he got what he wanted without any bloodshed.

Maybe the West should learn, there are different ways of taking over countries without having to revert to blazing guns!!

It's easy to take over a piece of land without any bloodshed when the vast majority of people of that land want you to take over them.

The Russians "invading" Crimea without any bloodshed is just as easy as the British "invading" the Falklands or Gibraltar without any bloodshed.

There is nothing here that "the West should learn".
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
The crux of this whole issue seems to be the legitimacy of this referendum.

Russia sends tanks in to 'protect' people but the rest of the world thinks it was a means to influence a vote.


If there is evidence that there was no such influence, then Putin could be justified. If there is clear evidence that this was a military offensive, then the rest of the world is right.

Not entirely. Even if the referendum was totally above-board, Russia was still wrong in violating international law. The problem though is how much credibility do the US and Canada have in preaching international law when we've thumbed our noses at it ourselves and say it's not worth the paper it's written on?

We say it violates the Ukrainian Constitution, but did the invasion of Iraq not violate the Iraqi Constitution too? If you say Iraq wasn't democratic, then in relative terms what about Ukraine not giving Crimea a referendum?

So this referendum still does not excuse Putin's actions. The issue here is that we're the pot calling the kettle black, with the pot maybe being blacker still.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
I am suspicious of the 95% result. That seems statistically impossible. You could hold a poll asking if the world should explode and end and you'll get about 85-90% responding 'no'.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,794
460
83
Fair point Machjo.

Would you say that international law was flawed or justified in this circumstance?
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
I am suspicious of the 95% result. That seems statistically impossible. You could hold a poll asking if the world should explode and end and you'll get about 85-90% responding 'no'.

It is a believeable result. Remember that many crimeans would have been educated in teh USSR and so would have memories of having been of one nation with Russia, not to mention that ethnically they are Russian not Ukrainian, why Putin talked of Russian speakers. It would be like a part of Canada separated from canada a few decades ago voting to rejoin it.
 

Durry

House Member
May 18, 2010
4,709
286
83
Canada
Crimea is now part of Russia.
There is nothing the west can do about it now, it's all over except for the crying (by the west).

All the west is doing now is waving a wet noodle, they may as well accept it and move on.

The bigger issue is, will Putin start to take over eastern Ukraine? The west should forget about Crimea now, it's a done deal.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
210
63
In the bush near Sudbury
I'm assuming that referendum (which the pro-Canadians just about won by the skin of their teeth) was legal. The Crimean one isn't.

If you can call the question put to Canadians about the 1995 referendum clear, then I suppose it was legal.

"Acceptez-vous que le Québec devienne souverain, après avoir offert formellement au Canada un nouveau partenariat économique et politique, dans le cadre du projet de loi sur l'avenir du Québec et de l'entente signée le 12 juin 1995?"

"Do you agree that Quebec should become sovereign after having made a formal offer to Canada for a new economic and political partnership within the scope of the bill respecting the future of Quebec and of the agreement signed on June 12, 1995?"

There were other referendums that led to questions of "attention seeking"
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
Fair point Machjo.

Would you say that international law was flawed or justified in this circumstance?

It's the concept that the ends do not justify the means. If international law is flawed, then we shodl try to cahnge it via legal means and not violate it. I guess I'm just a conservative law-'n-order type. We even obey laws with which we disagree. That's what the law is all about.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,338
1,799
113
I am suspicious of the 95% result. That seems statistically impossible'.

Rubbish. Try telling that to the Falkland Islanders and the Gibraltarians.



A referendum on political status was held in the British Overseas Territory of the Falkland Islands on 10–11 March 2013. The Falkland Islanders were asked whether or not they supported the continuation of their status as an Overseas Territory of the United Kingdom in view of Argentina's call for negotiations on the islands' sovereignty. On a turnout of 92%, an overwhelming 99.8% voted to remain a British territory, with 1,513 of the 1,517 who voted voting in favour, with only three votes against (one vote was invalid).

The British Overseas Territory of Gibraltar has had a similar referendum twice.



On 10 September 1967, Gibraltarian voters were asked whether they wished to either pass under Spanish sovereignty, with Gibraltarians keeping their British citizenship and a special status for Gibraltar within bordering Spain; or remain under British sovereignty, with institutions of self-government. Of the 12,237 who voted (a turnout of 95.67%), 12,138 (99.64%) voted to retain British sovereignty, with just 44 (0.36%) voting to become Spanish.

The Government of Gibraltar called a referendum on 7 November 2002 to establish the popular support for a proposal to share sovereignty of the territory between Spain and the United Kingdom. The result was a massive rejection of the concept. Of the 18,087 valid votes cast by Gibraltarians (89 were invalid or blank) in an 87.9% turnout, 17,900 (98.48%) voted NO, wanting to remain solely British, with just 187 (1.03%) voting YES.
 
Last edited:

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
All Rise







Statement by the Prime Minister of Canada on the results of the Crimean “referendum”


Ottawa, Ontario


16 March 2014


Prime Minister Stephen Harper today issued the following statement on the results of the Crimean “referendum”:
“The so-called referendum held today was conducted with Crimea under illegal military occupation. Its results are a reflection of nothing more than Russian military control.
“This “referendum” is illegitimate, it has no legal effect, and we do not recognize its outcome. As a result of Russia's refusal to seek a path of de-escalation, we are working with our G-7 partners and other allies to coordinate additional sanctions against those responsible.
“Any solution to this crisis must respect the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine as well as the constitution of Ukraine. Mr. Putin's reckless and unilateral actions will lead only to Russia's further economic and political isolation from the international community.”






- See more at: Statement by the Prime Minister of Canada on the results of the Crimean “referendum� | Prime Minister of Canada










http://pm.gc.ca/eng/news/2014/03/16...sults-crimean-referendum#sthash.d4siZA7h.dpuf
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
There are two Ukraine's and I would bet there are two nations within the old east block
countries. Some people don't want to give up the old ways they were used to during
the Iron Curtain days. Yes the people of Eastern Ukraine support the Russian move.
These people are not thinking as a nation they are thinking of their own personal
security in where they feel comfortable Unfortunately this will be in keeping with the
Russian plan to keep their Naval Base. It also demonstrates the allied feeling the
EAstern part of the country is experiencing. Many in Russia would like to go back to
Communism too. what they don't realize Communism never existed except in the
minds of ideology. Its the same as some believe in our western version of a simpler
time. No such thing "we are living in someone in the futures simpler time"
Communism was a dictatorship based on ideology that didn't work. Funny thing is
Capitalism doesn't work either for the broad masses of the world.