Nope, through these...Are you reading your history book backwards?
Explain
How in Hell did Chretien get two majorities because his "relaxed" style was in any way comparable to a government who had yet to be seated?
The voters see a relaxed government style and they feel good about re-electing them where with the Harper Conservatives are like stuffed shirts
Aren't you confusing democracy with something else/ Democracy means rule by majority. We haven't had a democracy ever, IMO. At the moment, we have a plutarchy and we've had that for quite a while.I tend to be a little kinder to the Liberals, all that excess on their part took place in the context of a very bitter fight for the survival of the nation, the PQs in Quebec were using provincial coffers to fund the separatist cause too.
What are the Conmen in power now fighting for again, all I'm seeing is a big stone wall where our democracy used to be.
*huge grin* You forgetting something? There's a whole pile of us blackmailers to get out of the way, too. lol
We should hope wish it was more republican (rule by law). What we have isn't close to that either.The democracy ended long ago, if there ever was one in this country. Our governmental style is more republican than democratic, for all the monarchist trappings it has. We elect a series of dictators, similar to what the Romans used to do, and while we can argue that the election itself is democratic, thats pretty much where it ends: we have little to no recourse until the next election comes. Harper gets a lot of flak for being dictatorial but he's really less so than Trudeau, Mulroney or Chretien; it may well be for no other reason than the minority parliament doesn't allow him to be so, but that doesn't change the truth of the matter. Romantacizing the past actions of other politicians doesn't change that truth either.
The voters see a relaxed government style and they feel good about re-electing them where with the Harper Conservatives are like stuffed shirts
In appearance or label only.We are a representative democracy.
lmao You're a riot, LM. Out-to-lunch, but a real riot.And the Liberals got a majority two more times because Cretien's stlye was more relaxed than the Harper government
rofflmfao ahaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahaaaheeeeeeeeeeeeheeheehheeheeeeeeeeeeeheeheeheeeeeeeeeExplain
Turn them upside down and you'd have it even more accurate.Nope, through these...
![]()
With ChRETIeN and his Finance Minister squabbling every other day? lmaoThe voters see a relaxed government style and they feel good about re-electing them where with the Harper Conservatives are like stuffed shirts
lol Sure, Hon. What wouldja like?AnnaG - where do you get all that energy from???? You woke me from my apres lunch doldrums.....
What an interesting topic this is to read.....I wonder if I could put in a request:
If you guys figure out your government, could you please pass along some advice to you know who down here? ahem shhhhhhh
The democracy ended long ago, if there ever was one in this country. Our governmental style is more republican than democratic, for all the monarchist trappings it has. We elect a series of dictators, similar to what the Romans used to do, and while we can argue that the election itself is democratic, thats pretty much where it ends: we have little to no recourse until the next election comes. Harper gets a lot of flak for being dictatorial but he's really less so than Trudeau, Mulroney or Chretien; it may well be for no other reason than the minority parliament doesn't allow him to be so, but that doesn't change the truth of the matter. Romantacizing the past actions of other politicians doesn't change that truth either.