The British Welfare State

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Comparative welfare rates in other states (Canada, U.S., rest of Europe, Australia)
Population growth
Type of dwelling these people live in
Level of income
State of the market for the industry of these people
Other personal factors that may impede getting a job

There's not much analysis in that article. Too many factors and variables that one needs to frame the scope of this data. It's not as simple as brandishing Britain as an apologist nanny state.

Hey look, Spice Girl Mel B is having her third baby daughter. Stop the presses.
 
Last edited:

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Ain't socialism grand? We could do this in Canada as well. All we have to do is elect a socialist government.

 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
Families with no history of the habit of work are those most likely to be involved in crime and disorder and whose children are most likely slip into truancy, drug abuse, crime and single parenthood.

Sounds like this article, and the British Ruling Class is trying to cast blame for the disastrous failure of the Neoliberal Global economic system on the poor. The fact is that jobs that provide even a subsistence salary for a family are disappearing from the West, replaced by service and sales jobs at minimum wage, while an ever more exclusive leisure class, involved in completely unproductive 'investment' or 'trading' activity, reap grotesque wealth, by selling out their own country's productive capacity.



I can only assume this is the first step in validating Thomas Malthus' postulates that 'natural market forces' should kill off the 'surplus population'.. the 'useless eaters'.. to prevent any potential civil rebellion.. that would endanger the interests of the rich. A preview of the immense desperation that our economic paradigm is engraining was seen on the streets of London last month.
 

The Old Medic

Council Member
May 16, 2010
1,330
2
38
The World
The US adopted a policy, during the Presidency of Bill Clinton, that you get no additional money for having children after you begin receiving welfare. And, unless you have a serious mental or physical disability, your lifetime limitation on receiving benefits is supposed to be 5 years. BUT, there are loopholes on those time limits, so unfortunately all too many people get ot remain on welfare for very long periods of time.

Frankly, were I emperor of the world, I would enact a policy that any parent that is not employed, for more than 2 years, and receives welfare for their children, loses those children permanently. They are to be put up for adoption by people that actually have the means to support those children.

Any woman that has more than one child out of wedlock, and applies for or receives welfare, loses the children to adoption, and get sterilized. Any man that refuse to support any children he fathers is placed on a hard labor work force, to clear brush, keep public areas clean, do necessary construction for the government, etc. They get food and a place to sleep (a barracks) but any earnings go to their children. They are also sterilized, so they can not father any more children for the working world to support.

Race, religion, none of that would matter at all. If you have illegitimate children, you either support them yourself, or you pay the price for YOUR choices and behavior.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
The US adopted a policy, during the Presidency of Bill Clinton, that you get no additional money for having children after you begin receiving welfare. And, unless you have a serious mental or physical disability, your lifetime limitation on receiving benefits is supposed to be 5 years. BUT, there are loopholes on those time limits, so unfortunately all too many people get ot remain on welfare for very long periods of time.

Frankly, were I emperor of the world, I would enact a policy that any parent that is not employed, for more than 2 years, and receives welfare for their children, loses those children permanently. They are to be put up for adoption by people that actually have the means to support those children.

Any woman that has more than one child out of wedlock, and applies for or receives welfare, loses the children to adoption, and get sterilized. Any man that refuse to support any children he fathers is placed on a hard labor work force, to clear brush, keep public areas clean, do necessary construction for the government, etc. They get food and a place to sleep (a barracks) but any earnings go to their children. They are also sterilized, so they can not father any more children for the working world to support.

Race, religion, none of that would matter at all. If you have illegitimate children, you either support them yourself, or you pay the price for YOUR choices and behavior.
How draconian of you.

Oops, your Jesuit side is showing.
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
5
36
London, Ontario
The US adopted a policy, during the Presidency of Bill Clinton, that you get no additional money for having children after you begin receiving welfare. And, unless you have a serious mental or physical disability, your lifetime limitation on receiving benefits is supposed to be 5 years. BUT, there are loopholes on those time limits, so unfortunately all too many people get ot remain on welfare for very long periods of time.

Frankly, were I emperor of the world, I would enact a policy that any parent that is not employed, for more than 2 years, and receives welfare for their children, loses those children permanently. They are to be put up for adoption by people that actually have the means to support those children.

Any woman that has more than one child out of wedlock, and applies for or receives welfare, loses the children to adoption, and get sterilized. Any man that refuse to support any children he fathers is placed on a hard labor work force, to clear brush, keep public areas clean, do necessary construction for the government, etc. They get food and a place to sleep (a barracks) but any earnings go to their children. They are also sterilized, so they can not father any more children for the working world to support.

Race, religion, none of that would matter at all. If you have illegitimate children, you either support them yourself, or you pay the price for YOUR choices and behavior.

Wow!

Oops, your Jesuit side is showing.

Mhmm, like combination of Ghandi and Mother Teresa all wrapped up in one.
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
Frankly, were I emperor of the world, I would enact a policy that any parent that is not employed, for more than 2 years, and receives welfare for their children, loses those children permanently.
I assume you are being sarcastic, the alterative reading being that your are a fascist. The truth is people want to have meaningful work, they want fair wages.. they don't want to be exploited.

Most economists agree that the surest sign of a collapsing economy, is a collapsing population, most noticeable in the fertility rate, which is well below replacement levels in most Western countries. So we should welcome children.. but if we want an orderly redistribution of wealth we should re-institute real progressive taxation on the filthy, parasitic rich.

That especially includes unearned Capital Gains, which should be taxed at the full marginal rate, and that top marginal rate should be re-established at about 72% (as it once was), for incomes over $150m. At the same time we can both create jobs and encourage a dynamic enterprising economy, by bringing in protective tariffs, and rescinding demand destroying and cumbersome sales taxes.
 
Last edited:

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
Socialism is a comunity where those who work support those who don't.

Anyone willing to bet a frozen rabbit that Abtfet doesn't work???
 

AbtFet

Time Out
Jul 23, 2011
507
0
16
Socialism has never existed anywhere, that would be contradictory to the rich elitist pricks that rule your lives today .