Tesla will reveal a semi truck in September

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario


The above looks like a covered one of the below.

 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
With electricity production more and more dependent on fossil fuel, I can't see how this is a real solution to carbon from fossil fuel. It only shows the majority of humans can't visualize that powering their battery will only mean the same amount of fossil fuel being used to produce electricity then what used to be pumped straight into the car.

Instead of spreading the pollution everywhere where cars drive. A heavy amount of pollution will concentrate at the origins of the electricity production.

Actually green energy growth has outstripped fossil fuel growth over the last few years. Also, pollution never stay in one spot. It always spreads worldwide.

In Canada in cold weather how long would the battery last supplying power and electric heat....?
A friend of mine has a hybrid and he has to run on the motor 6 months out of the year and his gas mileage over twelve months is worst than mine...


True enough. Batteries are going to have to improve a great deal before they can work well in all climates. However, there is huge research going into improved batteries. Sooner or later someone is going to get it right, especially as electric car companies like Tesla want their vehicles to replace all internal combustion engines.
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
Tesla Semi, an electric big rig truck with 500-mile range, rolls into reality


"Even with 80,000 pounds it'll get to 60 mph in 20 seconds," Musk said, hopping out of a truck. "What about up a hill?"

More significantly for trucking companies, Musk said that a standard diesel truck would be 20% more expensive to operate than a Tesla truck: $1.26 per mile compared to $1.51 per mile.

Musk said that if Tesla Semis were to drive in a convoy, in which trucks can draft off each other while letting computers and sensors keep them just feet apart at highway speeds, it could compete on cost with trains. "This beats rail," said Musk, throwing up an 85 cents per mile cost.

But Musk emphasized its performance. Tesla Trucks can hit 65 mph vs. 45 mph up a 5% grade compared to a standard truck, he said.

Then the biggest applause and hoots accompanied this stat: a 500-mile range, at maximum weight at highway speeds.

Investors were equally enthused. Shares (TSLA) rose 2% after trucking company J.B. Hunt Transport Services said Friday it had already placed an order for "multiple" Tesla Semis.

Musk hinted at a supercharger-less trip — no recharges needed.

"You can go 250 miles, deliver your load and come back," he said. That said, charging to 80% would take only 30 minutes, "or about the time of the average driver break" on a new solar-powered Megacharger network.

video

https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech...c-big-rig-truck-rolls-into-reality/873162001/
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
When will they come out with a line of farm implements where the seed-drill uses it's own tires as the propulsion system and the electric tractor doesn't have to do all the work? Remote control so it could find their own way around the field would be an area they could explore as trucks won't be driving themselves anytime soon.
It should be possible to make the trailers have motors on each axle that helps on slippery roads as well as recharging the batteries when going down inclines

If the trailers were set up like a bob-sled you could have 5 trailers hooked together and the last trailers would be in the same tracks as the tractor set town. That might work on ice-roads and interstates if they were always tabletop smooth. Crossing the Rockies will end at the first big hill and it doesn't matter if it is going uphill or down other than one ends at the runaway lane. Powered trailers would be a different story as they would be in total control no matter which way the grade was going. Moving them around the depot would also be a lot easier as you would only need a remote
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
Gonna be real fun seeing how well those electrics work out when traffic is stalled for hours in the middle of winter because of a wreck, and it's still 200 miles to the next charging station.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,501
8,102
113
B.C.
Gonna be real fun seeing how well those electrics work out when traffic is stalled for hours in the middle of winter because of a wreck, and it's still 200 miles to the next charging station.
Record snowfall for November on the Coq.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
without the engine load those batteries would power every system in that truck for months.

these still aren't for long haul. These are for people like Walmart (buying 24 of them) for deliveries from a central warehouse to surrounding stores.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Gonna be real fun seeing how well those electrics work out when traffic is stalled for hours in the middle of winter because of a wreck, and it's still 200 miles to the next charging station.
Other that heating the cab a e vehicle would not be using any power. Rig idling their engines are in more danger of not making it to the next fuel depot.
Here is a question for the collective, NG has an octane rating of 120 making it the equal of AV-Gas as far as how much compression can be built into the engine. The 3600psi is a big hurdle and the fill time at a station would be 'slow'. Since 3600 is the pressure you get welding supplies in why could you not change bottles at a service station rather than filling up a tank that stays with the vehicle? 5 minutes at most
3600 is also the pressure the air is in scuba tanks so there are cylinders available and the compressor is expensive but it does exist and could be adapted to refilling bottles at home
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
don't understand your question.

are you talking about burning fuel or compressing gas?
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Using NG in any engine that is now burning gasoline. To make it work at it's best it should have a compression ration of about 12/1. A turbo might be a better option that using just pistons to get that compression ratio.
It creates a lot less CO2 than gas so oil cutbacks could take place without gas becoming more expensive because there is less of it to go around. A conversion kit could be on the shelves by this X-mas if it became an emergency. Setting up the changes to factory built engines would be very simple also so nothing in production today would become obsolete anytime soon.

At minus 20 to minus 30 or colder? I have my doubts.
Insulated battery boxes and a battery blanket would not draw much power and it would all the batteries to be able of delivering full power as soon as needed.
On a big rig a small gas genset could be carried along, put it beside the blanket and tire-chains that every vehicle should have.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
12,395
1,367
113
60
Alberta
in fact at minus 15 or 20 when all those trucks run all day and all night up north the eTruck will be even more economical.

The batteries wouldn't be able to endure the harsh temperatures but even if they could, up north in places like Yellowknife, they're burning diesel to generate power for the city.

So what are you saving when you plug in?