Actually in theory the Queen is supreme monarch and she does own the lands
for the most part. Crown Land is a term for State owned land except the Queen
is the Queen of Canada at the moment so technically the lands belong to the
office of the Crown, or the Queen.
Yes it is time we had the Monarchy discussion, in one sense I would say get rid of
it, except in this country we have to be aware of our multicultural mess and remember
the land if sold off might fall into serious foreign ownership and not anything like
the crown land we are used to. Kind of like trying to get natives to sell their Reserve
rights..
She cant do anything with the land so this "ownership" would be in name only. She cant come to my front yard and decide to build a fence, or clear a forrest away and make money off of the resources. Saying she owns the land is similar to centuries of Britains monarchs claiming to be the King or Queen of France even when they had no land in France.
I'd say get rid of it as well. The monarchy never should have existed in the first place. The next time the constitution is opened I hope this is dealt with. Though I would not consider this to be the main problem that needs to be fixed. Just something annoying which would be nice to get rid of.