The only arbitrator between differing scientific opinions is experimentation.
Who has recent experimentation handy?
Who has recent experimentation handy?
As long as he doesn't post a graph.Whatever they are Sinister will balk.
The only arbitrator between differing scientific opinions is experimentation.
As long as he doesn't post a graph.
darkbeaver;.[IMG said:http://forums.canadiancontent.net/images/icons/icon7.gif[/IMG]
My goodness what have we done to this thread. back to the subject. I have read that to survive death you need to cultivate a vessel for the soul while you live.
I've offered you a lot of arguments, and you know that as well as I do, but never that one as far as I can recall. It's typical of your kind of thinker to dismiss critics with something they've made up about them. You're obviously not stupid, you're just scientifically illiterate.I've never seen him resort to that. His only argument is that I'm stupid...
Neither do we have anything to indicate anything inside the vehicle survives its dissolution.Now you are getting somewhere- we have nothing to indicate that anything besides the vehicle (crate, box, etc.) actually dies.
Dexter Neither do we have anything to indicate anything inside the vehicle survives its dissolution.[/QUOTE said:So we're back to square one we don't know whether there's life after death or not.
I believe that when my time comes one of two things will happen.
Option # 1 will be beyond my control and should this happen there is not a lot I can do except live my life as if this is the only one.
- The synapses in my brain will spiral down until everything fades to back, then nothing.
- My soul will leave my body and I will pass out of this world to the next.
Option # 2 is a completely different scenario and has left me to consider what will be my greatest reward if there is an after-life and this worldly existence is merely a few heartbeats against an eternity of existence.
After a great deal of thought I have decided that I will wait until Unforgiven has met with his demise and when he is about to enter the next world I will be waiting to say:. "Told yuh Unf!" Then I will direct him to the kitchen where the the Ale flows from all faucets.
The problem with #1 is none these bastards like Hitler, Stalin, Idi Amin don't have to face the "report card". For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
Maybe they reincarnate as male Preying Mantises and have their mates bite their heads off or cockroaches crushed under someone's foot. Or maybe they will get flesh eating disease where there is no medical help available. Karma is fun to speculate on but it has its own methods of equalization.So we're back to square one we don't know whether there's life after death or not.
The problem with #1 is none these bastards like Hitler, Stalin, Idi Amin don't have to face the "report card". For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
Maybe they reincarnate as male Preying Mantises and have their mates bite their heads off or cockroaches crushed under someone's foot. Or maybe they will get flesh eating disease where there is no medical help available. Karma is fun to speculate on but it has its own methods of equalization.
I've offered you a lot of arguments, and you know that as well as I do, but never that one as far as I can recall. It's typical of your kind of thinker to dismiss critics with something they've made up about them. You're obviously not stupid, you're just scientifically illiterate.
Faraday said that you can't have an electric field without a magnetic field and hence a magnetic field without an electrical one. If you have EM fields in space then without a doubt it MUST be paired to an electrical fields.Every point that I have made about the electric universe has been proven using the scientific method and every prediction made by that theory has been correct and verified by observation. There simply is nothing you can say about me that will change those facts. How is it that you can be scientifically literate about things that do not exist?
Thank you JLM
I always feel I should be wearing a turban when I write things like I did.
Once I made my thoughts known to my friends after a card game broke up and got laughed into the kitchen....it took me a while to calm down because I was serious. Many people disagree violently with the idea.
My thought whether real or not gives me an explanation of why we are and why we live as we do making mistakes, making huge advances, giving help and killing others...... it all must be learned.
We have much existence to live through and one lifetime cannot present all the issues or tests.
Dirt. Life is not a dress rehearsal for anything.
Faraday said that you can't have an electric field without a magnetic field and hence a magnetic field without an electrical one. If you have EM fields in space then without a doubt it MUST be paired to an electrical fields.
Faraday continued this idea to an ultimate expansion of his concept of the field of force to include not only the effects of electromagnetic fields, but EVERY force. The universe is filled with forces of one kind or another.
This is where the concept of the field of force gets very interesting.
Imagine an object and its field of force. Now imagine a second object with its field of force. Instead of curved lines indicating a single field, we now have a web, where the two fields of force overlap. Now, we all know that there are more than two objects emitting forces in the universe. Imagine the complexity of the web in which we are all caught, of which we are all a part, which we all, to varying degrees, can control.
Not only can we recognize that we are within a near infinite number of fields of force, but that a near infinite number of things are (or CAN BE) within one's own field of force, and both of these seemingly opposite relationships, just as the electric generator and the dynamo, can be used to one's advantage.
You cannot have an electric field without a magnetic field, just as you cannot be affected by the web without having an effect on it: The forces you emit affect the web of forces of the universe.
If a tree falls in the forest and nobody is there to hear it, does it make a noise?
If there is no conscious being there to witness it, does the Universe exist in form?
Does the Universe exist without our conscious participation?
Is not universe a hologram and we are the projector?
Life is a manifestation of our thoughts and beliefs. What if what we experience is nothing more than a holographic image created by our mental programming and that programming is performed by others who have been programmed by others, ad infinitum. What if the program is all wrong? What if, long ago, a typographical error was made and people have been using it unknowingly ever since? Is it possible that what we think is reality is just a computer glitch that no one knows is a glitch? What would happen to somebody who saw the glitch and tried to tell people that their reality was a hoax and how to fix it? The story of JC comes to mind.
Again, typical. That's simply false, and repeating it endlessly doesn't make it true. If it were true, the electric cosmos theory would be the scientific orthodoxy; it's not because it doesn't work. It's been obvious almost from the beginning what your problem is. You're fairly bright, but anybody who thinks Velikovsky was right is both scientifically illiterate and lacks critical thinking skills.Every point that I have made about the electric universe has been proven using the scientific method and every prediction made by that theory has been correct and verified by observation.