So, how about that Syrian chemical attack thing?

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Well, as long as you ignore the 2000+ chemical warheads that were unearthed between 2003-04 I guess one could delusionally exclaim there were no WMDs in Iraq.
Oh, and as long as you don't believe the Iraqi Air Force general who admitted they loaded up a half dozen, stripped down 737's with various components and materials from their chemical weapons dual use facilities and shipped them to Syria under the guise of humanitarian relief, as Syria had just recently suffered a major earthquake.

And of course one would have to be utterly oblivious to the fact that the US and Britain provided Iraq with chemical weapons capability during the Iran/Iraq War.


Wanna try reading it again? Actually it's f*cking pathetic that you'd try and make this about race. You're seriously a worthless putz.
Did you get that from the Disney Channel or the Discovery channel?? Do you even know they are two different channels.

So the US and the UK get to give chemical weapons to Saddam to use against Iranian women and children as well as any dissenters in Iraq but when the chemicals are used by another proxy warrior of the US uses them against Syrian women and children it suddenly becomes a 'red line'.
Why are the 200 civilian deaths in Mosul that were created by US bombing not treated by Trump with the same outrage? Let me guess, the US and her Allies only kill women and kids that would become dangerous later on in life while the lies about Syria are aimed at children that would only do good things in their lives.

https://www.democracynow.org/2017/3/30/amnesty_hundreds_of_iraqi_civilians_killed
Amnesty: Hundreds of Iraqi Civilians Killed in U.S. Airstrikes After Being Told Not to Flee Mosul

The Air Force Times is reporting U.S.-backed military aircraft have dropped over 2,000 bombs on the ISIS-held city of Mosul so far this month. According to Airwars, almost 1,500 civilians have reportedly been killed in U.S. airstrikes in Iraq and Syria this month alone. On March 17, a U.S. airstrike in Mosul reportedly killed up to 200 civilians. Meanwhile, Amnesty International is reporting that hundreds of Iraqi civilians have been killed by U.S.-led airstrikes inside their homes or in places where they sought refuge following Iraqi government advice not to leave during the offensive to recapture the city of Mosul. We speak to Donatella Rovera, senior crisis response adviser at Amnesty International.

For all his claims to not be in anyone's pocket and he doesn't lie it seem like the dark horse has gathered Trump in almost record time. Will he now arrest himself as a traitor to the American public, you know the ones he said he represented.
Justin Trudeau is in almost the same boat, lots of lip service for the citizens yet when push comes to shove there are places like Baffin Correctional Center where natives are exposed to mold and other toxins and any ill effects are blamed on overcrowding while Lawyers in Calgary get a brand new building when mold is found in a place they 'work'. Clearly there are two standards at work here. One gets more rights than they deserve and others are deemed to be disposable people.
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,281
3,992
113
Edmonton
Something smells to high hell here. I don't know what the heck happened or who to believe. Something just isn't right here (my gut tells me). I think Trump is being "set up" and they're playing to his arrogance and impulsiveness, using those qualities (for lack of a better tern) against him. I think there might be something to the fact that its to get the US involved in the ME.


While Trump is an idiot, who can't help but be moved by dead children? He'd have to be a monster and maybe that's what got him to change his mind because he did say when campaigning that he would not interfere with what was happening in Syria. Because he has kids, no matter what his business ethics are/were, he obviously loves them and can, at the very least, identify as we all can, with anger at the brutality against children.


But, as President, he really needs to not give in to emotions but logic and reason but I fear he's not up to that task. He just might end up making things worse for everyone.


JMHO
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
I might be concerned if Trump was acting on his own, but he has many advisors. It's easy for people to criticize, but the job isn't easy. I wouldn't want it, and recognize that I am not qualified. ( citizenship aside).
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Something smells to high hell here. I don't know what the heck happened or who to believe. Something just isn't right here (my gut tells me). I think Trump is being "set up" and they're playing to his arrogance and impulsiveness, using those qualities (for lack of a better tern) against him. I think there might be something to the fact that its to get the US involved in the ME.
There is no doubt that the Pentegram and the CIA are the ones in control of the US you also have to take into account that trump's closest advisors are all Jewish and their loyalty is to israel rather than the US of A.

While Trump is an idiot, who can't help but be moved by dead children? He'd have to be a monster and maybe that's what got him to change his mind because he did say when campaigning that he would not interfere with what was happening in Syria. Because he has kids, no matter what his business ethics are/were, he obviously loves them and can, at the very least, identify as we all can, with anger at the brutality against children.
He certainly doesn't care about children or he wouldn't have bombed Mosul about 10 days ago where 200 civilians were killed in 1 day. That is a battle that has been going on for some time so the figures are much higher than that but with zero exposure by the media or by trump himself. I guess Syrian children alone have a place in his heart.

But, as President, he really needs to not give in to emotions but logic and reason but I fear he's not up to that task. He just might end up making things worse for everyone.


JMHO
There is also the possibility that this was a test of the American cruise missile against Syria/Russia air defense systems and a score of 23/59 puts the US in the losing column. Israel no longer flies jets over Syria since 1 got tapped and then they started top launch missiles from the Golan Heights as launching them from Israel would have been an act of war. Israel lost that round as Russia could identify the launch site and that is what the response would have been aimed at. That would apply to israel also if she was used as the based to launch missiles against Syria.

Either way Trump just lost a lot of his supporters and the new ones he picked up are they very people he was running against as they are nothing but criminals and warmongers.

I might be concerned if Trump was acting on his own, but he has many advisors. It's easy for people to criticize, but the job isn't easy. I wouldn't want it, and recognize that I am not qualified. ( citizenship aside).
You probably wouldn't qualify as a dog catcher in a village with zero dogs.
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
Hillary approves of the strikes and wants more.

Her statement on this has made her supporters, as I have been touring such sites that support her, ummmmm, what's the word I'm looking for, ahhhh, 'uneasy' in their condemnation of Trumps actions.

They can't come right out and diss him for this so they are tip toeing around trying to say, well that's not really what she is saying. It is indeed embarrassing for them.

What her supporters are clinging to is her saying if Trump really cares about the babies he would let them migrate to the USA.

Watch this short clip to the end when the CNN host becomes uncomfortable with the guest asking where was Obama to help. She also asks him about the Travel Ban and he tells her 'we don't want to come to the USA, we want to stay in Syria'. She's not impressed..........

CNN Interview With Syrian Victim Goes Terribly Wrong When He Starts Bashing The Wrong President


www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzcBbeajRtk
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-ci...et-of-the-military-industrial-complex/5583986
t is apparent given the timelines and the lack of time given to verifying the validity of accusations concerning the gas attack in Homs, Syria, that plans had already been coordinated for such an attack. Watching the mainstream media the viewer receives the impression from the wording of the announcers reports and questions for the “experts” that the matter was already decided in favour of the U.S. military strike on the airbase. I see pictures of Colin Powell at the UN holding up glossy photos of supposed chemical weapons manufacturing plants. It demonstrates to a high degree how easily manipulated Trump is and how there is not an iota of critical thinking occurring in Trump’s prefrontal cortex. He has become a complete puppet to the military industrial complex regardless of his bold rhetoric during the election. Now that he is doing Hillary Clinton’s work for her, his approval ratings are sure to improve. Trump likes to win, and if winning, or being perceived as a “winner” means doing as others say without any concerns for logic or rationality, so be it – of course he is incapable of the latter anyway.
As Trump was dining with Xi Jinping at the moment of the attack, the generals in the background probably offered this up as something that could happen to North Korea as well. Admittedly China is not happy with North Korea, but they would be whole lot less happier with U.S. nuclear missiles stationed in North Korea. China is capable of looking long term, unlike politicians and businesses in the west, and is also capable of destroying the US$, not without harm to itself, but there is certainly a point where that would be an acceptable asymmetric counter to U.S. hegemonic desires.
Who benefits?
As for the chemical attacks, if one does use some rationality, meaning who benefits from it, the answer is definitely not Assad, and Assad should not be mistaken for either stupid or irrational. The beneficiaries are ISIS and al-Nusra (al-Qaeda in Syria). One of the side line winners as always with U.S. military mayhem in the region, is Israel, a country all our politicians seem to fawn over in spite of their terrible human rights and international law record. Israel would love to have all the rest of the Middle East broken up into fighting little fragments of tribal groups in order that their tribe can dominate the region, its resources, and perhaps find a ‘final solution’ to the Palestinian demographic problem.
Another favourite ally, Saudi Arabia, also benefits. Canada is also enamoured of the Saudis, perhaps because they are the ones keeping the US fiat petrodollar afloat through its use as the reserve currency. Canada of course needs that as well as Canada’s economy is very highly dependent on the U.S. economy and the US$. Canada also enjoys a degree of manufacturing trade with Israel and Saudi Arabia, mostly in the field of armaments and ‘security’.
In Turkey, Erdogan may benefit as he claims he wants more of the same, but he is playing a very dangerous double game. Being allied to the U.S. through NATO has some benefits, but it also has some drawbacks – obedience and subservience to empire in order to maintain its integrity geographically. The drawbacks concern the same item, geographic integrity, as the Kurdish people are at the cusp of establishing their own autonomous/independent zones, assisted by Canada and the U.S. The U.S. has supported then rescinded support for the Kurds, a people seemingly of ‘convenience’ for U.S./Israeli efforts at control of the Middle East.
Being tied into Russia’s economy, especially for agriculture, trade, and petroleum resources, another set of problems could occur.
Domestic Reaction; Canada
The Canadian public is generally ignorant of the complexities of foreign policy – well really they are not that complex when the baseline is U.S. desires to be global hegemon, supported by its ever favourite lap poodle, Canada. As mentioned above the MSM provide no real insights into this kind of overall picture as they are fully supportive of U.S. war efforts regardless of legality or intention.
Trudeau’s response was that of a very much junior partner seeking to avoid abrading Trumps tender ego. He supported the action, a quick turnabout from his days earlier pronouncements about verifying the source, means, and accuracy of the attack (anytime I see ”white helmets” now something fake must be going on). His thinking is fickle, a weather vane turning to avoid any harsh winds that might blow our way from criticising Trump or the U.S.in its imperial drive – and with NAFTA perhaps up for significant changes.
Of course Pierre Poilievre, the House Conservative opposition leader of the day, pronounced his support as well, but at least the Conservatives are consistent in their hard right support of all things USA! USA! USA! Given that several of their candidates for leadership have imitated certain Trump traits it would be surprising if they did otherwise.
Chrystia Freeland, Canada’s foreign minister waiting to become Canada’s leading ministerial oligarch has not said anything yet today. Two days ago our Lady in Red said the findings must be presented “in a highly credible international format so they cannot be disputed in any credible way.” Along with Trudeau’s lame additional comment about the way to resolve the matter in Syria is through negotiations (says the man sending troops to train/fight with the Kurds, and sending military vehicles to Saudi Arabia so they can continue to illegally attack Yemen), Freeland is an ardent neocon plutocrat (the Conservatives would love her as leader!). From the book titled Plutocracy, she writes,
“America really does need many of its plutocrats. We benefit from the goods they produce and the jobs they create. And even if a growing portion of those jobs are overseas, it is better to be the home of these innovators—native and immigrant alike—than not. In today’s hypercompetitive global environment, we need a creative, dynamic super-elite more than ever.”




Is the Son-in-Law now riding high above all others. You know the guy who got into some favored universities after daddy made contributions that were in the millions of dollars. Nice to know how you get qualified for things in the US.

Considering bhe has only been a stand-by person for a few months should he be scowling at anybody let alone a senior member of the government? Be nice to know what words were said to bring on this face.



 
Last edited:

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
Hillary approves of the strikes and wants more.

Her statement on this has made her supporters, as I have been touring such sites that support her, ummmmm, what's the word I'm looking for, ahhhh, 'uneasy' in their condemnation of Trumps actions.

They can't come right out and diss him for this so they are tip toeing around trying to say, well that's not really what she is saying. It is indeed embarrassing for them.

What her supporters are clinging to is her saying if Trump really cares about the babies he would let them migrate to the USA.

Watch this short clip to the end when the CNN host becomes uncomfortable with the guest asking where was Obama to help. She also asks him about the Travel Ban and he tells her 'we don't want to come to the USA, we want to stay in Syria'. She's not impressed..........

CNN Interview With Syrian Victim Goes Terribly Wrong When He Starts Bashing The Wrong President

I think it would be irresponsible of Clinton, in this instance, not to support the president. He is the CIC, and world opinion is on his side. The Dems reognize this and will choose their words carefully, for now. The majority of the world was in favour of the air strike, and hope that the US turns up the heat.

WRT the Dems immediate response, I would expect it to be one of guarded support.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Having Hillary call for the bombing of a syrian airbase before it happened makes it look like Hitlery and trump are holding hands behind some dark curtain.
Fact is trump just repeeled just about every campaign promise he ever made. the reasons don't really matter as he just made himself part of the problem rather than being part of the solution. At this point he might as well just let his daughter and husband run the show.
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
Hillary approves of the strikes and wants more...

I think she'll want to hear what was said by Sec of State Tillerson, as will the rest of the world. Things are on hold sort of, until the two countries have a chance to talk.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,187
14,243
113
Low Earth Orbit
If it makes you feel any better, I didn't like his policies either and I take on both Christians and Muslims too. And I really don't like people who call people they disagree with dipsh!ts and leftards. And I don't understand why some people take it personally when someone has a different point of view. Certainly it is a sign of insecurity.
Crazy is just a different point of view?

I think she'll want to hear what was said by Sec of State Tillerson, as will the rest of the world. Things are on hold sort of, until the two countries have a chance to talk.
They should be eating vareniki and ham right now.
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
I think that bluster aside, it's up to Putin to decide if he wants to see things escalate. I'm doubtful things will, and I feel that way based on Russia's diminished military response capability and the fact that his advisors are in constant communication with the rest of the world.

They will probably continue to beat their chests, but it's theatrics. We won't hear too much about substantive changes, but we will see them gradually unfold.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
lol, how true.
https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201704091052464214-assad-us-syria-goal/
Syrian President Bashar Assad said on Sunday that the US has failed to achieve the goal behind its attack on a military airfield in Syria, which is namely "raising the morale of the US-backed terrorist gangs."

The US has failed to achieve the goal behind its attack on a military airfield in Syria, which is namely "raising the morale of the US-backed terrorist gangs," Syrian President Bashar Assad said on Sunday, according to the country's news agency SANA.
The comments came in a phone conversation with Iranian President Rouhani who called the Syrian leader to voice his strong condemnation of what he called the "US' blatant aggression" on Syria.
The Iranian President said that this aggression constitutes a "blatant violation of the Syrian sovereignty and all the international laws and conventions," the agency said.
The Iranian President also stressed that his country stands by the Syrian state in its war against terrorism and in the initiatives it proposes to find a peaceful solution to the crisis in Syria that would lead to stopping the bloodshed of the Syrians.
In response, the Syrian leader made assurances that the Syrian people and army are determined to eliminate terrorism in every part of Syrian territory.
Bashar Assad also thanked the Iranian leadership and the people for their continued support of the Syrian people in the face of the terrorist war which is backed by many Western and regional states.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
If it makes you feel any better, I didn't like his policies either and I take on both Christians and Muslims too. And I really don't like people who call people they disagree with dipsh!ts and leftards. And I don't understand why some people take it personally when someone has a different point of view. Certainly it is a sign of insecurity.
Really? So when you said this, you weren't implying that I'm a racist?
Yup, the black dude started it so the Cheeto gets a free pass. War mongers 101.
Or how about this?
Every twit who hated Obama from the minute he took office did so because they were racist
A different point of view? Go f*ck yourself idiot. Calling me a racist isn't a different point of view, it's you being a judgmental a$$hole because you made an idiotic assumption. Now you know why I called you a dipsh*t. Because you are one. And despite your protestations to the contrary, you are a leftard because your first f*cking instinct was to drag race into what I said when race wasn't even inferred or implied. And what's really astounding about your dumba$$ery is the fact I also blamed Bush for the mess over there but you happily ignored that to play the race card like a good little brainless progtard.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Former CIA Officer: "The Intelligence Confirms The Russian Account On Syria" | Zero Hedge
President Trump earned neocon applause for his hasty decision to attack Syria and kill about a dozen Syrians, but his rash act has all the earmarks of a “wag the dog” moment.
Just two days after news broke of an alleged poison-gas attack in northern Syria, President Trump brushed aside advice from some U.S. intelligence analysts doubting the Syrian regime’s guilt and launched a lethal retaliatory missile strike against a Syrian airfield.
Trump immediately won plaudits from Official Washington, especially from neoconservatives who have been trying to wrestle control of his foreign policy away from his nationalist and personal advisers since the days after his surprise victory on Nov. 8.
There is also an internal dispute over the intelligence. On Thursday night, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said the U.S. intelligence community assessed with a “high degree of confidence” that the Syrian government had dropped a poison gas bomb on civilians in Idlib province.
But a number of intelligence sources have made contradictory assessments, saying the preponderance of evidence suggests that Al Qaeda-affiliated rebels were at fault, either by orchestrating an intentional release of a chemical agent as a provocation or by possessing containers of poison gas that ruptured during a conventional bombing raid.
One intelligence source told me that the most likely scenario was a staged event by the rebels intended to force Trump to reverse a policy, announced only days earlier, that the U.S. government would no longer seek “regime change” in Syria and would focus on attacking the common enemy, Islamic terror groups that represent the core of the rebel forces.
The source said the Trump national security team split between the President’s close personal advisers, such as nationalist firebrand Steve Bannon and son-in-law Jared Kushner, on one side and old-line neocons who have regrouped under National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, an Army general who was a protégé of neocon favorite Gen. David Petraeus.
White House Infighting

In this telling, the earlier ouster of retired Gen. Michael Flynn as national security adviser and this week’s removal of Bannon from the National Security Council were key steps in the reassertion of neocon influence inside the Trump presidency. The strange personalities and ideological extremism of Flynn and Bannon made their ousters easier, but they were obstacles that the neocons wanted removed.
Though Bannon and Kushner are often presented as rivals, the source said, they shared the belief that Trump should tell the truth about Syria, revealing the Obama administration’s CIA analysis that a fatal sarin gas attack in 2013 was a “false-flag” operation intended to sucker President Obama into fully joining the Syrian war on the side of the rebels — and the intelligence analysts’ similar beliefs about Tuesday’s incident.
Instead, Trump went along with the idea of embracing the initial rush to judgment blaming Assad for the Idlib poison-gas event. The source added that Trump saw Thursday night’s missile assault as a way to change the conversation in Washington, where his administration has been under fierce attack from Democrats claiming that his election resulted from a Russian covert operation.


Russia, Iran Warn U.S. They Will "Respond With Force" If Syria "Red Lines" Crossed Again | Zero Hedge
A statement issued on Sunday by a joint command centre consisting of forces of Russian, Iran and allied militia alliance supporting Syrian President Bashar al Assad said that Friday's US strike on the Syrian air base crossed “red lines” and it would "respond with force" to any new aggression while increasing their level of support to their ally.
In the statement published by the group on media outlet Ilam al Harbi, the pro-Assad alliances says that “what America waged in an aggression on Syria is a crossing of red lines. From now on we will respond with force to any aggressor or any breach of red lines from whoever it is and America knows our ability to respond well."
Earlier on Sunday the UK's Defence Secretary, Sir Michael Fallon, demanded Russia rein in Mr Assad (by which he really meant be willing to accept a new Syrian regime with a pro-western puppet leader, and one who is willing to allow the Qatar gas pipeline to cross the country on its way to Europe.
Fallon also claimed that Moscow is "responsible for every civilian death" in the chemical attack on Khan Sheikhun and said Putin was responsible for the brutal killings “by proxy”, because it was the Syrian president’s “principal backer." The defense minister said the attack had happened "on their watch" and that Vladimir Putin must now live up to previous promises that Mr Assad’s chemical weapons had been destroyed. His comments came after Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson pulled out of a Moscow visit hours before he was due to fly.
* * *
Finally, for those who are unclear about the core geopolitical tensions that are at the base of the long-running Syrian proxy war, the answer is - as so often tends to be - commodities and specifically natural gas, as we first explained in 2013, and as summarized in the following October 2016 article courtesy of Eric Zuesse (see also "Competing Gas Pipelines Are Fueling The Syrian War & Migrant Crisis")
The Oil-Gas War Over Syria (In 4 Maps)




It would seem the tomahawks that are missing all hit 'the Donal' in the foot.



https://www.darkmoon.me/2017/americ...rters-desert-him-in-droves-over-syria-attack/
‘SHOCKED AND ANGRY . . . NO ONE VOTED FOR THIS!’


I never knew it would come to this: that a newly elected President of the United States, like a snake oil salesman, should con millions of trusting Americans into giving him a leg-up into the White House, all in the belief that he was their man, only to jump into bed later on with the Jews and give them all the finger.
Today is Palm Sunday, the day Jesus entered Jerusalem on a donkey to the sound of hosannahs, and palms were scattered before his feet. Let the donkey celebrate the hour:
Fools! For I also had my hour;
One far fierce hour and sweet:
There was a shout about my ears,
And palms before my feet.
Who would have thought that, two thousand years later, an alien race from Khazaria would have ensconced themselves in the land where Jesus lived and pass themselves of as the rightful owners of that land? And who would have imagined for a moment that a con artist of an American president should enable them to expand their ill-gotten territories, with the help of his Jewish son-in-law in the White House, and that this should all be done under the trusting noses of the American people — possibly the most ill-informed and brutalized bunch of civilized morons the world has ever seen?
This is what I read on my own website by former Trump supporters, “Dump Trump!” And this: “Trump has crossed my red line. It’s all over, baby. Unlike some who still continue to make countless excuses for Trump, others are awakening from the Trump dream. I had hoped Trump was the real deal, I voted for him in the primary and the general election. I stuck with him as long as I could. I was played, and I fell for it, but it’s all over now.”
Another respected writer on my site throws his cards on the table, revealing himself in the process as an extreme anti-Semite:
“The one thing that will get you and ‘L’ to drink a toast to each other, and make the rest of us bring out the champagne bottles, is to turn on the news one day and find the towers of Tel Aviv have come toppling down.
I do believe the day will come when the world sees Israel go up in smoke.
Armageddon approaches. The land where Jesus walked will become an uninhabitable wasteland for centuries.
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
That has to be embarrassing for him. :lol:

Tapper is a loose screw, but so are Chris Cuomo, Van Jones and Erin Burnett. They can be over the top for what is supposed to be a news network. But hey, I don't watch sitcoms, so I get my laughs from alternative sources.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,187
14,243
113
Low Earth Orbit
8
Something smells to high hell here. I don't know what the heck happened or who to believe. Something just isn't right here (my gut tells me). I think Trump is being "set up" and they're playing to his arrogance and impulsiveness, using those qualities (for lack of a better tern) against him. I think there might be something to the fact that its to get the US involved in the ME.


While Trump is an idiot, who can't help but be moved by dead children? He'd have to be a monster and maybe that's what got him to change his mind because he did say when campaigning that he would not interfere with what was happening in Syria. Because he has kids, no matter what his business ethics are/were, he obviously loves them and can, at the very least, identify as we all can, with anger at the brutality against children.


But, as President, he really needs to not give in to emotions but logic and reason but I fear he's not up to that task. He just might end up making things worse for everyone.


JMHO

Let's get this straight so it makes sense.

1. I'm 99.9% sure intelligence and military had these targets lined up months if not years ago.

2. The President has zero to do with the method of attack, the choice of platform, when to attack, or even why.

3. Yes there is support to gain or lose and there is indeed sabre rattling with Russia.

It was inevitable and it's 100% supported by and encouraged by Ottawa.

If you want conspiracy theories Canada has as much to gain by staging it as another global player. We have over 100 special forces boots on the ground and black ops just like the US Russia or Botswana.

3. There is big money to be made ending this so there are heavy corporate hitter with reasons ramp up activity and get rid of Assad.

4. Wait and see.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Syrian Observatory says air strike kills at least 15 people near Raqqa

An air strike believed to have been carried out by the U.S.-led coalition against Islamic State killed 15 people including four children in a village west of the jihadists' stronghold of Raqqa on Saturday, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said.

The spokesman for the U.S.-led coalition could not be reached for immediate comment.

The air strike took place at Hanida, some 30 km (20 miles) west of Raqqa on the southern bank of the Euphrates River, the Observatory said.
Syrian Observatory says air strike kills at least 15 people near Raqqa | Reuters

so trump kills children does he?
that ain't gonna fly.
...and reported by damned reuters eh?

That has to be embarrassing for him. :lol:

Tapper is a loose screw, but so are Chris Cuomo, Van Jones and Erin Burnett. They can be over the top for what is supposed to be a news network. But hey, I don't watch sitcoms, so I get my laughs from alternative sources.

i get mine reading your posts
:)