SAM's ....... in 1948, link please.
Not launching military fighters, missiles, is a tactic the US used on 911, are you sure it wasn't the US whom 'advised the Arab states?
Sixth Annual Israeli Apartheid Week
- Thread starter earth_as_one
- Start date
Not launching military fighters, missiles, is a tactic the US used on 911, are you sure it wasn't the US whom 'advised the Arab states?
Rothschilds were Czechoslovakian? Until the Korean War, Israel was officially a neutral.
http://www.christusrex.org/www1/news/haaretz-5-10-06b.html
Much came from France too.
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/cpc-pubs/farr.htm
Last edited:
Six-Day War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Check the link for Order of Battel for isreal and the Rest - could not copy it properly.
There you go, they weren't training for war, so Israel's pre-emptitve strike was as defensive as the Nazis entering Poland. That is eerie all by itself. Did they think nobody would notice?
MHZ
Now you know as well as the Wiki is not a highly credible source - but the numbers for military strength are reasonably accurate.
100,00 troops on your border - talk of war - Would you have sat back knowing how outnumbered you were, how you could not sustain a war on 3 fronts - How the economy comes to a standstill -
What would you have done?
That info was in your other link.
What would I do? I would stop killing their cousins and see how things progress from there. I wouldn't expect 20 years of bitterness about night-crawlers terrorizing people is going to just evaporate, given time and playing above board (and out from behind closed doors) it will fade. That and a few war-crime executions and an aweful lot of cash from their benifactor, the Rothschilds and their partners in crime. I mean really some of those things they did almost defies description.
[SIZE=+1]THE DAHMASH MOSQUE MASSACRE:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+0]11 July 1948 (Palestine): after the Israeli 89th Commando Battalion lead by Moshe Dayan occupied Lydda, the Israelis told Arabs through loudspeakers that if they went into a certain mosque they would be safe. In retaliation for a hand grenade attack after the surrender that killed several Israeli soldiers, 80-100 Palestinians were massacred in the mosque, their bodies lay decomposing for 10 days in the mid-summer heat. The mosque still stands abandoned today. This massacre spread fear and panic among the Arab population of Lydda and Ramle, who were then ordered to march out of these towns after they were stripped of all personal belonging by Israeli soldiers. Yetzak Rabin, Brigade Commander then says: - There was no way of avoiding the use of force and warning shots in order to make the inhabitants march ten to fifteen miles to the point where they met up with the legion-. Most of the 60,000 inhabitants of Lyda and Ramble came to refugee camps near Ramallah, around 350 lost their lives on the way through dehydration and son stroke. Many survived by drinking their own urine. The conditions in the refugee camps were to claim more lives.[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]Back to top[/SIZE] [SIZE=+1]DAWAYMA MASSACRE:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+0]On October 29 Palestine): the Israeli army brutally massacred about 100 women and children, precipitating a massive flight of people from that village on the western side of the Hebron mountains. Mr. Walid Khalidi, author of All That Remains, says that the Palestinian inhabitants at Dawayma faced one of the larger Israel massacres, though today it is among the least well-known.[/SIZE] [SIZE=+0] The following are excerpts of a description of the massacre published in the[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+0] Israeli daily ‘Al ha Mishmar, quoted in All That Remains:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+0] The children they killed by breaking their heads with sticks. There was not a house[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+0] without dead…one commander ordered a sapper to put two old women in a certain[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+0] house…and to blow up the house with them. The sapper refused…the commander then ordered his men to put in the old women and the evil deed was done. One soldier boasted that he had raped a woman and then shot her…[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+0] A former mukhtar (head of a village) of Dawayma interviewed in 1984 by the Israeli daily Hadashot, also quoted by Mr. Khalidi, offered another description:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+0] The people fled, and everyone they saw in the houses, they shot and killed. They[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+0] also killed people in the streets. They came and blew up my house, in the presence of eye-witnesses…the moment that the tanks came and opened fire, I left the village immediately. At about half-past ten, two tanks passed the Darawish Mosque. About 75 old people were there, who had come early for Friday prayers. They gathered in the mosque to pray. They were all killed.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+0] About 35 families had been hiding in caves outside Dawayma, according to the[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+0] mukhtar, and when the Israeli forces discovered them they were told to come out, line up, and begin walking. “And as they started to walk, they were shot by machine guns from two sides…we sent people there that night, who collected the bodies, put them into a cistern, and buried them,” the mukhtar told the Israeli daily.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Back to top[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]HOULA MASSACRE:[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]26/10/1948 (Lebanon) :Houla is located in southern Lebanon, only a few kilometers from the Israeli border. When Arab volunteers gathered to liberate Palestine from "Israeli" occupation, they established their headquarters in Houla, on hills overlooking Palestine. The force was successful in fending off major attacks on Lebanese villages, but the fighters suddenly withdrew on October 26, 1948." "Jewish militants attacked the town to avenge the residents' support of Arab resistance forces. On October 31, Jewish militants dressed in traditional Arab attire entered the border village. Residents gathered to cheer the men, thinking Arab volunteer fighters had returned. They were wrong. The militants rounded up 85 people and detained them in a number of houses, firing live ammunition at the civilians and killing all but three. That was not enough. Jewish militants blew up the houses with dead corpses inside. They confiscated property and livestock. The three who survived the massacre, of whom one is still alive, and other town residents fled to Beirut. Following the armistice agreement between Lebanon and "Israel" in 1949, village residents returned to find their houses in rubbles and their farms burnt. Houla remains under Israeli occupation today, and has suffered the brunt of "Israeli" animosity towards Lebanon. Only 1,200 out of 12,000 people remain in the village. The Houla massacre was one of a series of massacres committed by "Israel" against Lebanese civilians.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Back to top[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]Salha Massacre:[/SIZE]
1948 (Lebanon) : After forcing the population together in the mosque of the village, the occupation forces ordered then to face the wall, then started shooting them from behind until the mosque was turned into bloodbath, 105 person were mrytyred.
Pretty busy weren't they?
I did answer it. Does the history lesson bother you, I can absolutely say I doubt it can be more than the bother ones being killed and threatened with death went through.
I would think all these things would be of interest to a court that hold the power of life and death over the Israeli Gov. Here it might take about 6 posts, in the war-crimes trial it might tale a few years to fully document the fine details of all those missing Arab villages.
That is because the title of the web page is called Israeli Massacres. I could do one the Arabs if you like, once I finish this one. I thought you would have that mapped out for next month's
First Annual Palestinian Apartheid Week
So far there are two speakers and a microphone. There doesn't seem to be any line-up at the moment.
First Annual Palestinian Apartheid Week
So far there are two speakers and a microphone. There doesn't seem to be any line-up at the moment.
Why - he is a racist all year long - as many are that support AAH Week - Read how York University when Jews wanted to put up an information booth - had to provide security etc pay for all that - why - because AAh Week fanatics will tolerate no difference from the party line -
Clearly racist -
Not as handicapped as you, but it's a handicap in a combat theater.
Riiight! And the bulk of the world saw the closing of the Straights of Tiran to Israeli flagged ships as an act of war. Only the perpetual morons of your ilk believe otherwise, or have no idea that it even preceded the war.
The answer is no.
Here's the problem, you haven't a goog enough grasp of history to have a discussion on this topic, let alone to have formulated an opinion.
I suggest you actually go and read about the history of the area. And you should start by not reading things on the web.
Try an actual history book, not OpEd pieces.
Lol if it's BS then why was there a ceasefire? Ceasefire from what? The world did begin in July 2008. Nice try though.
Anyone seen EAO - seems to have wither under the light of day and facts - But if you are walking a street and you see a Right hand up in a salute type manner - It just might be EAO
Where in the World is EAO - Any guesses - Ok he is not - not in Israel -
after all they have a secret plan to exterminate the Palestinians - So where in the World is Freak Boy????????
Ah a mystery - Could be asking his mother if she likes his new Girl - He would need mama's approval now would he not. But she just might say - Plastic - Rubber - who cares - none of them are good enough for you.
Where in the World is EAO - Any guesses - Ok he is not - not in Israel -
after all they have a secret plan to exterminate the Palestinians - So where in the World is Freak Boy????????
Ah a mystery - Could be asking his mother if she likes his new Girl - He would need mama's approval now would he not. But she just might say - Plastic - Rubber - who cares - none of them are good enough for you.
I don't think the machine guns were so busy they had to stop to let them cool down before all the targets were dead. Given enough time you could kill 100 womean and kids with a single shot .22.
Bulk of the world being US allies more or less, post the results of that 'poll'.
When Kennedy put Cuba under a sea blockade, backed by American warships, that was not considered an act of war, or at least it didn't start one. They were stopping military supplies, if JFK had included medical supplies then it would have been an act of war against Cuba, but he was smart enough not to cross the line.
It is a boycott if it was consumer goods, that is not a war crime, those ships were welcome to use a different route.. Was it consumer goods or was or ships of war?
Israel has Gaza under the same principle, they turn away goods destined for Gaza, medical supplies and food supplies come under aid to humanity. By your reasoning Israel has no right to interfer with goods destined for Gaza or the West Bank. Her sea blockade is an act of war because it targets humanitarian supplies.
His question was answered, why no rebuttal to the rest of my post. The last argument to that whole article was the author of one events was sued over the 'term' massacre. That word was never used in his original article, however the ones who did the killing never denied the event happened just like his investigation, they objected to the term massacre. 100 or so people (women and kids) lined up and gunned down. I don't care if it bother you, it is the truth about how Israell has acted since the beginning if the mess that was created by the West.
I'm not claiming to be a expert in history. At the same time I reserve the right to bust out into laughter when I see a graph that not only has the hockey-stick appearance but it is more like a pregnant hockey stick to boot. If you want to swallow that as the truth go for it, just don't expect (or demand) me to agree with something that is not as firm as you believe it to be.
So I can grow up to be like you? No thanks, I prefer to expand my knowledge rather than be spoon fed with no chance to ask questions. All your points should be able to be confirmed by some sort of 'official reference'.
But they all list source material, if an article is against what you believe it wouldn't matter if it came from the Encylopedia Britannica.