September 11, 2001 Anniversary

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
I've been bashing them hard for quite a while. Since I started I've travelled extensively in the US. Besides, I don't hate Americans. I am anti some US policies. There is a big difference, although I acknowledge that the difference is meaningless to your typical Tea Partier and their associated red necks, some of whom post here. Are US policies any of my business? At least two points are worth arguing:
  1. Policies that they brag about and I think effect me are fair for me to debate.
  2. "America the Loud" is in everybody's face all the time anyway.
Besides, the Internet is the biggest intelligence boon a country like America could ask for. It allows them to make the same kinds of lists Hitler used to make for the same reasons, only with more names and written evidence. Many sites are rooted in US intelligence and many posters are at-work government employees. Sometimes over a long enough period you can see distinct word-usage changes occur in long term posters as people come and go in jobs. That is becoming less so as strategies become more sophisticated and Internet culture becomes more known.

Don't let them catch you when you over there.
Who knows what them ****ers will do to ya...
They can't be trusted.

;-)
 

BaalsTears

Senate Member
Jan 25, 2011
5,732
0
36
Santa Cruz, California
Point to a personal attack? There are none unless, you consider criticisms of US policies and activities to be personal? Granted, far too many Yanks are like that.

I don't mind however. I'm new here and trying to get a handle on how the rules are enforced. Apparently rules about attacking other posters personally are honoured in the breach more than the observance. Nice to know, but soft boundaries can make for unfair enforcement. Cuss words are presumably jumped on because I see none. They are easier to enforce because either they're there or they're not. This being a Canadian site I presume that disparaging words about sexual orientation will be jumped on with great self-righteousness as politically incorrect. Disparaging but unprofane slights such as that used by the above poster do not seem to invite criticism. The mine field is somewhere in the middle. I guess it provides ground for fertile thought for those who get personal satisfaction out of calling anonymous online strangers names.




As for our American friends, I am glad they’re here. To use an Americanism, they make for a target-rich environment, emotionally excitable, poorly educated and easily set up. The fun never ceases because they don't learn very easily.



You may be right about his intentions. I hope so. A bluff based on past US atrocities would be a smart play.



Gotta love the Tea Party line - simple, stupid and disingenuous, marginally within the grasp of an infantry mind but stopping there.



Interesting point. The only thing I would change is to say "Israelis" instead of "Jews" to differentiate between the Jewish faith and the government of Israel.


How well educated are you?

Where did you do your undergraduate work?

Where did you do your graduate work?

Where did you do your post-graduate work?

[/FONT][/FONT][/FONT]
 

tober

Time Out
Aug 6, 2013
752
0
16
How well educated are you?

Where did you do your undergraduate work?

Where did you do your graduate work?

Where did you do your post-graduate work?

[/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT]

You've got to be ****tin' me? You want personal information about my education? There is a good chance I'm better educated than you, but who cares? Yankee go home.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
You've got to be ****tin' me? You want personal information about my education? There is a good chance I'm better educated than you, but who cares? Yankee go home.

Americans and people from any country are welcome on this Site.
Do you have a problem with that Buck?
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
I believe he was offering you a job...


sight unseen...


I believe he was being a typical arrogant american.

I heard there is a gigantic fat blob in the sewers of London. Need a good man to go down and get at it. I wonder if Tober is down for the job?


I've heard that there is no one better than you at sliding around in the sewers, so I think that job would be best left for you...... the expert.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
I believe he was being a typical arrogant american.




I've heard that there is no one better than you at sliding around in the sewers, so I think that job would be best left for you...... the expert.

Well you are not fond of Americans now are you?
 

hunboldt

Time Out
May 5, 2013
2,427
0
36
at my keyboard
I heard there is a gigantic fat blob in the sewers of London. Need a good man to go down and get at it. I wonder if Tober is down for the job?
t
That was uncalled for , goober. On another fora, a similar remark bought a response that the poster regretted..
.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
How well educated are you?

Where did you do your undergraduate work?

Where did you do your graduate work?

Where did you do your post-graduate work?

[/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT]

You must be talking about before the school of hard knocks, during the school of hard knocks and after the school of hard knocks, that's the kind of "graduating" that is much more important than that to do with any schools.
 

tober

Time Out
Aug 6, 2013
752
0
16
Well you are not fond of Americans now are you?

Often in recent years I have read Americans bragging on the Internet about US forces killing Third World women and children. US sniper Chris Kyle wrote a book about his kills and the US media featured him in televised news shows bragging about it. Conservative US bloggers express great delight with stories like Kyle's, often saying that more people should be shot in their own countries. No, I'm not fond of people like that. When I was growing up in the 1950's people who did this were referred to as Nazis and thought of as undesirable. When I was in the Canadian Forces we believed the people referred to as "commies" did the same kinds of things, and we greatly disrespected their conduct and were willing to fight them. I see no reason to change a lifetime of moral standards just because those standards are now standard operating procedures for the US military. No, now that you ask I am no longer fond of Americans.
 
Last edited:

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
WTH is a "fora"?


He didn't use it right, that is why I put "" around it in my reply. It is the plural for forum. Therefore, what he should have said is "on other fora" rather than "on another fora". It's what happens when one tries to come across smarter than one truly is on forums. They end up hoisted on their own petard.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
He didn't use it right, that is why I put "" around it in my reply. It is the plural for forum. Therefore, what he should have said is "on other fora" rather than "on another fora". It's what happens when one tries to come across smarter than one truly is on forums. They end up hoisted on their own petard.

Exactly as I suspected, Gerry! It's that damn Latin.-:)
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Exactly as I suspected, Gerry! It's that damn Latin.-:)


I decided to do a little digging, as I use "forums" as the plural form normally and wanted to get a definitive answer as to the "proper" form. Guess what, not so definitive,lol. Here's what Oxford has to say and Mediacollege

Oxford

Definition of forum in English


forum

Pronunciation: /ˈfɔːrəm/
Translate forum | into German | into Italian | into Spanish noun (plural forums)


  • 1a meeting or medium where ideas and views on a particular issue can be exchanged:we hope these pages act as a forum for debate
  • an Internet site where users can post comments about a particular issue or topic and reply to other users' postings; a message board.

  • 2chiefly North American a court or tribunal.
3 (plural fora /ˈfɔːrə/) (in an ancient Roman city) a public square or marketplace used for judicial and other business.


seems pretty definitive to me. ;)

Media College

Forums or Fora?

Fora is sometimes cited as the correct plural for forum. Although it is indeed correct, there is some debate over whether it is the only correct pluralisation. Most online dictionaries provide both fora and forums as acceptable terms.
You will notice that we use the plural forums here at MediaCollege.com. This is for two reasons:

  1. It appears to be acceptable English.
  2. It is the pragmatic solution.
Whilst we are against most forms of language dumbing-down, we are also against unnecessary complication. Everyone knows and understands the word forums. Most people don't know what fora means. There is almost no chance of changing that situation significantly, no matter how hard the purists might want to. Like the failed Esperanto language, we believe reality wins over idealism. It's sad but inescapably true.
We don't believe it makes sense to promote fora as the "correct" pluralisation because it creates confusion, offers no real benefit, and can't work anyway so it's pointless trying.


Kind of mixed on that one, but still pointing to "forums" rather than "fora". I would say that those that use "fora" run the risk of getting their snout caught on the overhead electrical wires.