Selfsame - Happy 9/11
- Thread starter B00Mer
- Start date
So I can explain the impossibility of WTC7 to you?? Do your own homework or is being an example of what happens when latch onto whatever is repeated 10 times per hour for a whole hour.
Islamic radicals number in the hundreds of millions. They may not all be the ones doing the killing but they are supporters and sympathizers to the terrorists. Many live right here in Canada.
Does he support bombing Muslims or would it be more accurate to say he supports bombing people with a violent streak who happens to be a Muslim? Quite often you'll find it's not so much the ethnicity as it is the behaviour!
Conspiracy theorists are beyond reason and also spend half their day and believe every stupid thing they read on facebookWas the velocity and weight of the plane factored into that? (Not to mention the friction generated on impact)
Especially Cliffy..
It wouldn't surprise me if he had a facebook page open continuously on his PC...
The basic facts of the situation inarguably capture the salient facts of the situation. Four planes did 100% of the damage, each one flown/controlled by Muslim terrorists! How is any sane person able to totally dismiss those facts. In my earlier post I also neglected to add that "momentum" was also part of the equation - contributing to the heat generated.
I don't know but I can tell you I don't support it because all it does is make more radicals.
"People who believe in the official government theory of what happened on Sept. 11, 2001 must find the laws of physics to be a real pain in the neck. They must hate it when these silly laws keep showing how their neat story of Islamic terrorism simply isn’t possible.
There are so many examples: the too-small hole in the Pentagon and lack of wreckage outside; the scattering of debris from Flight 93 over an area of several miles and virtually no wreckage at the crash scene; molten steel under the three World Trade Center towers that came down; the fact that fire was simply not hot enough to have brought down both of the twin towers; and that they couldn’t have been destroyed so quickly without explosives. And those are just the big ones.
There’s another aspect to the destruction of the twin towers that doesn’t get as much attention but that is huge when it comes to proving the fiction of the official theory.
When the destruction of the South Tower started at 9:59 a.m., just 56 minutes after it was hit, the top of the building began to tip over (as you can clearly see in the photo above). And, according to Sir Isaac Newton’s law of the conservation of momentum, it should have kept tipping over. There was nothing that could have stopped the momentum of this rotation. Except explosives.
The only way we didn’t have the top 34-floor section lying in a heap beside the tower is that it fell apart – or more to the point blew apart – at the beginning of the “collapse.” The reason we’ve let this fact slip by most of us is that the top of the building quickly disappears amid all the smoke and debris. We never see it again.
But here’s the most important point: Newton wouldn’t be able to reconcile this tilting top with the symmetrical descent that followed. With the top tilting at approximately 23 degrees, how could it be exerting a uniform, symmetrical pressure on the floors below? In fact, how could it exert any force at all? And how could all of the building’s 47 core columns fail uniformly given that the destruction wasn’t symmetrical when it started."
There are so many examples: the too-small hole in the Pentagon and lack of wreckage outside; the scattering of debris from Flight 93 over an area of several miles and virtually no wreckage at the crash scene; molten steel under the three World Trade Center towers that came down; the fact that fire was simply not hot enough to have brought down both of the twin towers; and that they couldn’t have been destroyed so quickly without explosives. And those are just the big ones.
There’s another aspect to the destruction of the twin towers that doesn’t get as much attention but that is huge when it comes to proving the fiction of the official theory.
When the destruction of the South Tower started at 9:59 a.m., just 56 minutes after it was hit, the top of the building began to tip over (as you can clearly see in the photo above). And, according to Sir Isaac Newton’s law of the conservation of momentum, it should have kept tipping over. There was nothing that could have stopped the momentum of this rotation. Except explosives.
The only way we didn’t have the top 34-floor section lying in a heap beside the tower is that it fell apart – or more to the point blew apart – at the beginning of the “collapse.” The reason we’ve let this fact slip by most of us is that the top of the building quickly disappears amid all the smoke and debris. We never see it again.
But here’s the most important point: Newton wouldn’t be able to reconcile this tilting top with the symmetrical descent that followed. With the top tilting at approximately 23 degrees, how could it be exerting a uniform, symmetrical pressure on the floors below? In fact, how could it exert any force at all? And how could all of the building’s 47 core columns fail uniformly given that the destruction wasn’t symmetrical when it started."
I hope you guys realize that the towers are still there. They're disguised by holograms, and the monument that was 'built' in their place is all a fake.
Nobody was killed; they are all prisoners kept inside the towers because they were all going to reveal the conspiracy. Microsoft and GE are in on the scam; it's all funded by the Rothschilds, and it's discussed at the Bilderberg summits.
You guys who think it was an inside job are SO far behind the game that's really afoot, you've been sucked in by the false flag operation that made the original explanation seem like a false flag operation.
Nobody was killed; they are all prisoners kept inside the towers because they were all going to reveal the conspiracy. Microsoft and GE are in on the scam; it's all funded by the Rothschilds, and it's discussed at the Bilderberg summits.
You guys who think it was an inside job are SO far behind the game that's really afoot, you've been sucked in by the false flag operation that made the original explanation seem like a false flag operation.
Is selfsame (Nassir) actually a Scientologist? He has been absent from this thread. Probably because Cliffy and Mhz have cast sufficient stupid in it. selfsame's stupid wouldn't be noticed.
Like a demon, he is quietly reading, waiting for the moment to post.
I think I smell him now.
Like a demon, he is quietly reading, waiting for the moment to post.
I think I smell him now.