Seismic Evidence Implies Controlled Demolition on 9/11

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Seismic Evidence Implies Controlled Demolition on 9/11

Posted on December 1, 2012 by WashingtonsBlog
Yet Another Line of Evidence Shows Demolition

André Rousseau is a Doctor of Geophysics and Geology, a former researcher in the French National Center of Scientific Research (CNRS), who has published 50 papers on the relationships between the characteristics of progressive mechanical waves and geology.
Dr. Rousseau is an expert on measurement of acoustic waves.
Rousseau says that the seismic waves measured on September 11th proves that the 3 buildings were brought down by controlled demolition. Specifically, in a new scientific article published by the Journal of 9/11 Studies, Rosseau writes:
The seismic signals propagating from New York on September 11, 2001, recorded at Palisades (34 km) and published by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO), have here been subjected to a new critical study concerning their sources. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that the nature of the waves, their velocities, frequencies, and magnitudes invalidate the official explanations which imply as sources the percussion of the twin towers by planes and the collapses of the three buildings, WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7.
***
First of all, we show the contradictions in the official explanation between the seismic data and the timing of the events. Then we point out that it is strange that identical events (percussions of identical towers on the one hand, and collapses of identical towers on the other hand) at the same location would have generated seismic sources of different magnitudes. We demonstrate that only strong explosives could be the cause of such seismic waves, in accordance with the observed low frequencies. According to the nature of the recorded waves (body and surface waves), we can propose a location of each explosive source. According to the presence of shear waves or the presence of Rayleigh waves only, we hypothesize a subterranean … explosion.
***
Near the times of the planes’ impacts into the Twin Towers and during their collapses, as well as during the collapse of WTC7, seismic waves were generated. To the degree that (1) seismic waves are created only by brief impulses and (2) low frequencies are associated with energy of a magnitude that is comparable to a seismic event, the waves recorded at Palisades and analyzed by LDEO undeniably have an explosive origin. Even if the planes’ impacts and the fall of the debris from the Towers onto the ground could have generated seismic waves, their magnitude would have been insufficient to be recorded 34 km away and should have been very similar in the two cases to one another.
As we have shown, they were not.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
65
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Dunno about Towers 1,2 but 7 wasn't even touched and flattened out like an accordion. Even conservative Alex Jones smells a dirty rat somewhere.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
Holy crap, I thought this nonsense ended years ago. I had no idea there were still people around that bought into this, especially given the lack of any hard evidence.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
Trutheres never say die. Just look how long the birthers have claimed Obama isn't a US citizen. The flat earth society has been around even longer. Truth and common sense never interfere with belief.
 

The Old Medic

Council Member
May 16, 2010
1,330
2
38
The World
Conspiracy nutcases will believe ANYTHING. And just because one "scientist" postulates something, does NOT make it true.

I SAW those airplanes hit the two towers! Maybe this "scientist" should explode about 20,000 gallons of JP-4, and see if that meets his definition of an "explosion".
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
I do not believe the conspiracy theory but there are some strange things that have happened in History.
Dieppe was a raid, and a failure, not only that, the Germans knew the Canadians were coming and the
British knew the Germans knew but they went ahead any way.
The Americans had broken the Japanese code and knew that Pearl Harbour was a target yet the Japanese
had little difficulty in carrying out the burden.
Even so who knows what happened but this was not done by the Jewish Community or Israel or the American
resistance or anything else we watched on TV what happened
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
116,106
13,858
113
Low Earth Orbit
What are the errors in the data and theory? Please point them out and explain in detail to disprove the article and clarify the mental health status of the author.

There is a nice crisp $20 bill in it for anyone who can.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
116,106
13,858
113
Low Earth Orbit
Ummm... the official story is a conspiracy theory.


There was no need for a cover up when emotional trauma, trust in govt and popular media did just fine to divide and conquer.


A rule of thumb to live by: Never trust govt and never trust popular media.


Just look at how the Rawandan govt used the popular media to brainwash and then divide and conquer.

If MTV told viewers that CMT viewers were out to get them and they should kill anybody in a cowboy hat it wouldn't take too long for the first shots to ring out.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
If MTV told viewers that CMT viewers were out to get them and they should kill anybody in a cowboy hat it wouldn't take too long for the first shots to ring out.
Want to bet the cowboys open fire first and have a better kill/shot ratio?