I think anyone forced to go to school for 18 years of there life or more (All kids in Canada)
Know just as well as you do what the problem with our education system are.
first off, You need to understand how diffrent the the kids are to you to understand them. here is the diffrence between you and them.
Larry Lessig on laws that choke creativity | Video on TED.com
Just understanding how different your students are to you will make all teachers much better in understanding what drives them to be motivated to do things and in consequence learn from doing.
Here is a ton of good talks on the subject on how to change schools from people that are much smarter and wiser then both of us.
Ken Robinson says schools kill creativity | Video on TED.com
Sir Ken Robinson: Bring on the learning revolution! | Video on TED.com
Kiran Bir Sethi teaches kids to take charge | Video on TED.com
Patricia Ryan: Don't insist on English! | Video on TED.com
Temple Grandin: The world needs all kinds of minds | Video on TED.com
Ken Robinson: Changing education paradigms | Video on TED.com
Sugata Mitra: The child-driven education | Video on TED.com
Ali Carr-Chellman: Gaming to re-engage boys in learning | Video on TED.com
Mae Jemison on teaching arts and sciences together | Video on TED.com
you guys have a system that only 25% of the total child population can be happy living in, and rewarding that small minority of kids that can sit down and shut the **** up for 18 years of there lives with the ability to access Higher paying jobs after going to universisty?. and now 75% of the of the population thats left out is saying sckool sucks but they don't know what there talking about? Ignoring the elephant in the room a bit no?
Here is how our law system screws up our chance at good sckools in the first place.
Philip K. Howard: Four ways to fix a broken legal system | Video on TED.com
Education and many of our goverment institutes need total overhaul not a little update or more money.
Its all broken.
Have you ever considered that our institute of education is ruining as many lives as its creating successful ones
In spite of your the large number of video lectures attached to your post you still have not come up with any solution to what you consider the problems of education. You should understand that during the career of the average teacher (at least in Alberta) the teacher attends dozens of such lectures similar to those that you have posted. They are presented during teachers' conventions, at professional development days, and in special guest presentations. In short, teachers are more than familiar with the ideas proposed in your videos.
Why then, you might ask, are not more of these ideas implemented? Well, to a certain extent they are. In my classes I employed a large number of teaching techniques in which the students were allowed to take charge. These consisted of the running of simulation games (one game I helped develop for Grade 11 Social Studies took about two weeks to complete), posing a question and then breaking the class into study groups to come up with a variety of solutions, creating scenarios in which students were given a challenge and left to devise methods of dealing with it, and so on. The problem was, that interesting as these programs were for the students and the fact that they resulted the teaching of concepts that could not be used in a normal class setting, they were also incredibly time consuming. One of the constraints faced by every teacher is the fact that a certain amount of content has to be covered. Certainly there are many innovative ways to teach this content, but much of the time it is necessary to simply resort to traditional teaching methods in order to cover what the curriculum demands. It does little good to have an extremely entertaining and very popular class if the students in that class cover only a quarter to a half of what the Department of Education demands.
In short, as you have pointed out, schools and teachers are part of a system. No teacher I know of ever set out to teach a lesson in as boring a manner as possible, but frequently the constraints of time force teachers to present information in the most effective method possible. That method is often the lecture system; a form of transferring knowledge that goes back several thousand years. Not every student enjoys this approach, but studies have shown that when it comes to transferring information to as many students as possible in as short a time as possible, that the lecture approach cannot be surpassed.
You have made a number of other points I am not going to address because this reply is already long enough. Suffice to say that teachers and educational system are well aware of every point you have made and have been attempting for decades to implement programs that make education enjoyable and successful for as many students as possible.
Unfortunately, you are viewing the situation from the point of view of an outsider who only sees a small part of the educational system. There is a solution to this if you have the time and inclination. Invite yourself into the local school as a volunteer. You will probably find that you will be readily accepted once you have passed a background check. I suspect your view of the educational system and the job teachers are doing will undergo a radical change.
As I said before, teachers are well aware of the deficiencies of the educational system. One of the favourite "games" teachers like to play is discussing and solving all of the problems of the system in which they toil. I can't remember the number of discussions of this sort that I participated in, but it was probably in the hundreds. Unfortunately, for the most part the classroom teacher is really not in a position to institute major educational reforms. Such reforms can only be instituted by the powers that be in the Department of Education; a bureaucratic organization that most teachers regard as utterly useless so far as implementing any real change is concerned.
If you really want to be fair about criticizing the educational system, put the blame where it is deserved; on the Minister of Education and the ivory tower bureaucracy that tells the classroom teacher, what to teach, how to teach, and when to teach and which burdens teachers with as much bureaucratic nonsense as it can.