Ouch, getting a little pissed are we? There's a very clear decline in the courage of your convictions here. When you got called out all you could do was say "progressive can't handle a variety of views!" and then lashing out and calling me names. Right, progressives can't handle it. Who's kept their cool? Who collapsed into whining and rage when this exchange got rough? You did.
Isn't obtuse Ezra's angle? They are mirroring each other. That is a wicked play by pyschcological team
I did get pissed.
I guess you just can't handle a variety of views.
Wow, you two have something in common.I guess you just can't handle a variety of views.
I guess you just can't handle a variety of views.
Wow, you two have something in common.
You aren't actually holding out hope, are you?not only that but the little lass still hasn't listened to the piece for the facts and admitted she was wrong in her blather to Colpy.
I did get pissed.
I know you are actually competent in reading comprehension, and I said at least 3 times that Ezra Levant was WAY out of line.
Yet you persist in pretending that Levant is Sun TV.
When you are insisting on being obtuse, further discussion became a waste of time, and simply put, you got on my nerves. If that was your intent, congratulations: SUCCESS. It just isn't worth it for me to continue talking to a brick wall........so I just walked away..
If you think you shook my confidence in my position you are sorely mistaken.
Trudeau’s silence speaks volumes | Editorial | Opinion | Toronto Sun
For good reason, the less exposure he has, the lower the chance of being revealed! -Trudeau's not speaking to reporters? The Conservatives would never stop anyone in their government from speaking to reporters, right? :lol:
Politicians.
Have you been following JT's moonbat followers here?For good reason, the less exposure he has, the lower the chance of being revealed! -![]()
Have you been following JT's moonbat followers here?
He could say he supports ISIS beheadings and they'd come up with excuses as to why that's ok.
While you support the morally correct position that burning innocent civilians to death with incendiaries is just peachy-keen, as long as you don't behead them.Tell me about it!-I've been told on this forum the beheadings are OK. I think the term was "dead is dead"-
![]()
While you support the morally correct position that burning innocent civilians to death with incendiaries is just peachy-keen, as long as you don't behead them.