Quit Picking on the Republicans

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
58,245
8,417
113
Washington DC
Revising Maryland’s use of solitary confinement in prisons

By Editorial Board October 29




THE UNITED States is a world leader in solitary confinement, a degrading assault on the mind that the Supreme Court came close to declaring unconstitutional in 1890.



You wouldn’t know this from state corrections departments. Arizona, for example, insists that “no such confinement exists in our institutions” — even though the state just agreed to alleviate the isolation it enforces on thousands of prisoners under a new settlement with the American Civil Liberties Union. Maryland, as the Baltimore Sun has repeatedly noted, prefers terms such as “disciplinary segregation” and “administrative segregation.” These programs pull in about 8 percent of the state’s prison population, most of them for violating prison rules, according to a 2012 internal state analysis we obtained.


No matter what officials call it, Arizona is being forced to make some changes. Maryland, on the other hand, is having trouble even holding a debate on the issue, thanks to the General Assembly.


After we wrote about the Arizona case last week, we published a letter from Susan Kerin of Interfaith Action for Human Rights noting that Maryland lawmakers recently scuttled a bill calling for an independent analysis of the state’s use of prisoner segregation. The bill merely asked for a report on living conditions and the frequency with which state facilities isolate prisoners. It sought recommendations on how to reduce the number of prisoners in isolation, how to improve conditions and how to manage juveniles and the mentally ill. All of these goals should be priorities for any state that claims to run a humane prison system.


Many corrections officials insist that some prisoners have to be separated to prevent violence. Maryland officials also point out that many of those in what they call segregated housing have cellmates, so true long-term solitary confinement is rarer than critics suggest.
But is it rare enough? Weeks, months and years of solitary confinement can destroy people’s minds. Stories of healthy inmates leaving solitary with a mental illness are horrible but unsurprising. So are accounts of inmates who enter it with a mental illness and come out worse — if they don’t commit suicide, a particular problem in isolation programs.


Isolation can seem like an easy solution for dealing with a violent or antisocial inmate, but it can be expensive and counterproductive, deepening the psychosis that led to bad behavior. The internal report found that isolated prisoners in Maryland face “heightened risk for worsening physical and mental health outcomes.”


Paul Smith is a mentally ill prisoner in Maryland whose parents told reporters last year that he had been held in solitary confinement for four years; during two of them, he hadn’t been allowed visitors or phone calls. Mr. Smith’s parents finally got to see him after WUSA-TV reported on his case. Unsurprisingly, they found that their son’s bad mental state had worsened.


Prisons should isolate inmates only in rare cases when that is the singular way to prevent violence. The General Assembly should ensure that Maryland abides by this principle, rather than hiding behind euphemisms.



Revising Maryland’s use of solitary confinement in prisons - The Washington Post


Damn Republicans!
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Hilarious... The message here is 'don't touch my welfare and freebies'..

You really should have read the actual message Cliffy instead of simply believing that it was a dig at corps or wealthy guys
The difference between you (and all the other cons on here) is that I don't take anything or anybody seriously, especially politics. Cons like to bash people who do not think like them and sometimes I like to throw a stick in their gears, cause they espouse to be righteous while bashing others.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
The difference between you (and all the other cons on here) is that I don't take anything or anybody seriously

That is crystal-clear


Cons like to bash people who do not think like them and sometimes I like to throw a stick in their gears, cause they espouse to be righteous while bashing others.

That's what you want to see and thus, the only message that you take-away from anyone you deem 'conservative'
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Barstool Economics

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this…


  • The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing
  • The fifth would pay $1
  • The sixth would pay $3
  • The seventh would pay $7
  • The eighth would pay $12
  • The ninth would pay $18
  • The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59
So, that’s what they decided to do.
The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve ball.

“Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20″. Drinks for the ten men would now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men ? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?
The bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by a higher percentage the poorer he was, to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using, and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.


  • And so the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% saving).
  • The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% saving).
  • The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% saving).
  • The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% saving).
  • The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% saving).
  • The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% saving).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings.

“I only got a dollar out of the $20 saving,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,”but he got $10!”

“Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a dollar too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!”

“That’s true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get $10 back, when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”

“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn’t get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!”

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and government ministers, is how our tax system works. The people who already pay the highest taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Barstool Economics

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this…


  • The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing
  • The fifth would pay $1
  • The sixth would pay $3
  • The seventh would pay $7
  • The eighth would pay $12
  • The ninth would pay $18
  • The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59
So, that’s what they decided to do.
The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve ball.

“Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20″. Drinks for the ten men would now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men ? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?
The bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by a higher percentage the poorer he was, to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using, and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.


  • And so the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% saving).
  • The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% saving).
  • The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% saving).
  • The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% saving).
  • The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% saving).
  • The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% saving).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings.

“I only got a dollar out of the $20 saving,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,”but he got $10!”

“Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a dollar too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!”

“That’s true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get $10 back, when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”

“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn’t get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!”

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and government ministers, is how our tax system works. The people who already pay the highest taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.


Ain't that the truth?
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
65
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Republicans Tried to Suppress the Black Vote in North Carolina. It's Not Working. | Mother Jones




Republicans Tried to Suppress the Black Vote in North Carolina. It's Not Working.
Thousands more African-Americans have already turned out to vote this year than in 2010. Here's how Democrats are doing it ... There are 800,000 more registered Democrats than Republicans in North Carolina




Isn't it interesting that the majority of voters in that state are Democrat but Republicans are still in control (governor and legislature is headed by GOP). Same thing with other areas in the USA. Too bad that up to now Democrats have been so silent and have refused to force Republicans to change voting districts in order to give more appropriate representation to voters.





..
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Isn't it interesting that the majority of voters in that state are Democrat but Republicans are still in control (governor and legislature is headed by GOP). Same thing with other areas in the USA. Too bad that up to now Democrats have been so silent and have refused to force Republicans to change voting districts in order to give more appropriate representation to voters.


You would do the Dem party a huge favour by proving these allegations... A Congressional Investigation would be the result with many, many arrests and massive loss of support for the Reps.

.... So, what are you waiting for?
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA