That is the Republican specialty, ironsides. Rich get richer and the poor get poorer under Republican administrations (which is the usual result of spending cuts and tax cuts).The rich will still get richer and the poor will get poorer and Obama will keep on smiling all they way to the bank.
2- If you criticize him - you are either one or all of the following - Red Neck - Illiterate - Racist - Republican/Conservative Stooge - Just plain dumb -
SJP - Nope - Figured you or someone else would add to the list - But the facts of division in the US speak towards what I have brought forward - Anything in particular ( Point) that I made that you disagree with?You left out 'Obama hater' and 'birther', Goober.
The Democrats are just as or richer than the Republicans. It is what politicians do, rob from their constituents.
Jobless recovery, like being almost pregnant.
YouTube - GeraldCelenteChannel's Channel
There are "only" three different Threads on the front page with the word Obama
in the Thread title. What does that mean? 8O :-?
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/news/87315-foolish-obama.html
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/us-american-politics/83387-quit-picking-obama.html
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/news/87188-congratulation-president-obama.html
?????????
under governments, people suffer.''Under Clinton, everybody prospered. Under Bush, the rich got richer, the poor got poorer. ''
As patriot Harry S Truman always said, if you want to live like a Republican, vote Democrat''.
Give it time, ironsides. Unemployment takes time to come down, it is the last piece of the recovery. If a year from now unemployment is where it is today (or even higher), then it could properly be called a jobless recovery, but it is very premature at present.
''Under Clinton, everybody prospered. Under Bush, the rich got richer, the poor got poorer. ''
As patriot Harry S Truman always said, if you want to live like a Republican, vote Democrat''.
Tell that to the millions who are unemployed. Not sure if you knew or not, but a person on unemployment insurance is counted in the stats as unemployed, when those benefits run out (6 months to a year depending) that same person is off the unemployment rolls, even though they are still without work. In the U.S. it is possible for every person to be out of work and yet we would show no unemployment. That 9-11% you read about is not even close.
There are "only" three different Threads on the front page with the word Obama
in the Thread title. What does that mean? 8O :-?
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/news/87315-foolish-obama.html
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/us-american-politics/83387-quit-picking-obama.html
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/news/87188-congratulation-president-obama.html
?????????
So what is your point, ironsides? Isn’t that the way unemployment is traditionally measured in USA? Or do you want to change the method now to show a huge, sudden jump in unemployment?
In fact, unemployment is a tough nut to crack. Even when the economy starts producing jobs, the unemployment still may not come down for some time. The reason is that when the economy starts producing jobs, many of the job seekers who had got discouraged and gave up looking for job, taken up studies etc.; enter the job market once again. So drop in unemployment comes a few months after the economy starts producing jobs.
People still live like animals. In case you've let your head swell into thinking humans aren't animals, here's the taxonomic classification of the human being. Pay close attention to the top of the list right after the word "kingdom"):''under governments, people suffer''
Before there were governments, the caveman lived like an animal.
- wikiDomain: Eukarya
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Superclass: Tetrapoda
Class: Mammalia
Infraclass: Eutheria
Order: Primates
Suborder: Haplorrhini
Infraorder: Simiiformes
Parvorder: Catarrhini
Superfamily: Hominoidea
Family: Hominidae
Subfamily: Homininae
Tribe: Hominini
Genus: Homo
Species: H. sapiens
Subspecies: H. s. sapiens
So what is your point, ironsides? Isn’t that the way unemployment is traditionally measured in USA? Or do you want to change the method now to show a huge, sudden jump in unemployment?
In fact, unemployment is a tough nut to crack. Even when the economy starts producing jobs, the unemployment still may not come down for some time. The reason is that when the economy starts producing jobs, many of the job seekers who had got discouraged and gave up looking for job, taken up studies etc.; enter the job market once again. So drop in unemployment comes a few months after the economy starts producing jobs.