Privatizing Aboriginal Reserves
- Thread starter dumpthemonarchy
- Start date
Yes you have, but you go ahead and deny it, it keeps the mentally deficient on your side at least.
No I haven't. Perhaps you should make a point of understanding the issue until you wade in and comment. My issue is that Canadians are treated differently (legally speaking) in this country for no other reason than birthright. I have a problem with that. None of the dodge and weave tactics from the likes of you (or CB for that matter) have managed to explain why this position is bad. Clearly you are either an idiot and can not grasp my position or (more likely) you can't really argue against it so you try and make it about something else.
If you believe that some Canadians should be given rights that other Canadians don't have simply because of who their daddy was or maybe because they were born with a penis or maybe just that they have the proper colour skin, then be a man and just say so.
Yup. People are treated differently. You and dumpy are prime examples of how you want to treat people differently. If people are First Nations you and he feel that they should NOT have their treaty rights honoured. You both feel that, for some reason, white boys are better and don't need to live up to their legal obligations.
Forget privatizing reserves and abolish them all together. Reserves reenforce the notion that Native Canadians are different and unequal to the rest of the population, and that's not what our parents taught us. Canada simply does not practice what they preach in regards to equality.
Last edited:
Wrong again. I have no problem honouring treaty rights. I think you have been paying too much mind to CB's nonsense.
Nah, I've known some blacks who are more intelligent than lots of whites. I'm surprised you think Jews are cheap! :lol:
Your ignorance just shifted into high gear. I think hunger is a real scientific reason for hunting! Oh, and don't bother pasting sh*t for me, as I has no idea that the author isn't just as ignorant as you!
No need for you to sign your name, we all know who you are!
What dodge? I answered your generalized question with a generalized answer. It's not my fault you're not bright enough to understand that.
Your goal post shuffle aside, that isn't what you asked. I'm not surprised I have to explain that to you.
Wrong again.
I didn't lie. I answered you asinine generalized question, with a generalized answer.
But thanks for posting material that supports my position, as Gh pointed out. I hope you'll soon learn that there isn't just one aboriginal group, under one treaty. It would go a long way to prevent you from looking so stupid so often.
From your link...
As I've said so many times. Given the many treaties, and complex nature of the issue, any generalization, is not constructive. Clearly you are either an idiot and can not grasp my position or (more likely) you can't really argue against it so you try and make it about something else.
Are you not allowed to hunt or fish for domestic or commercial purposes?
Ummm...
So you do have a problem with honouring treaty rights. Maybe if you were consistent, logically or otherwise, people would believe you and you wouldn't look like such an idiot all the time.
Last edited:
That's where your stupidity and naivity speak loud and clear. I think one hunting for food, has a little more interest in preserving the resource than one who is looking for a "rack" for the wall in the den. And you don't have to keep signing your name.
I'm still trying to figure out what this all has to do with your racist claim that aboriginal hunters are more responsible than white hunters. Are you claiming that aboriginals are always hungry or that white people don't get hungry?
I'm glad it supports your position. Since it also supports mine, it would seem that we are in agreement. It makes me wonder what you've been blathering about for so long.
You're off the rails, I wasn't making a racist claim, just pointing out a difference between some of two demographics, there Bob & Weave.
It was only a matter of time before you got something right, to bad it was simply accidental. Now that you admit it supports my position, I guess you'll be apologizing to Gh.
I see you missed the question, so I'll ask it again. Are you allowed to hunt or fish for domestic or commercial purposes?
Clearly you are either an idiot and can not grasp my position or you can't really argue against it so you try and make it about something else. Although it's most likely the former that causes you to do the latter.
With all that some;-) say about Native beeing able to hunt anywhere, anytime...
I'm wondering why you bother paying for a license for Deer every year.................:smile: