Prince of Wales becomes oldest heir to the Throne for 300 years

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,816
3,557
113
hmmmm... really? In another thread you said that our relationship never should have been allowed. might want to rethink the congrats.
I think what I probably ment was under age relationships should never have been allowed. I hope that clears up things. p.s. I hope that you were not offended by my post. I was just thinking in terms of protecting the young.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
Ya, I imagine for those that are insecure, that would be a concern.

It has nothing to do with insecurity for us. In my previous relationship (22 years of marriage) I was the sole breadwinner so there was never a question. All the money went into one account and we both used it. My current partner came from a similar situation but he had more control over the money. The system we use was discussed at great length and modified many times to get where it is today. We are both very happy with it and it puts us both on equal footing in the relationship. I know that is tough to understand for someone like you Gerry who wants to keep women subservient but some of us actually believe women are equals.
 
Last edited:

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
It has nothing to do with insecurity for us. In my previous relationship (22 years of marriage) I was the sole breadwinner so there was never a question. All the money went into one account and we both used it. My current partner came from a similar situation but he had more control over the money. The system we used was discussed at great length and modified many times to get where it is today. We are both very happy with it and it puts us both on equal footing in the relationship. I know that is tough to understand for someone like you Gerry who wants to keep women subservient but some of us actually believe women are equals.


For a second I thought I'd missed something about you. But no, apparently just a typo or a misread.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
For a second I thought I'd missed something about you. But no, apparently just a typo or a misread.

To elaborate, in my marriage my wife & I both had equal access to the money (both had bank cards and cheques). In my partner's marriage she got an allowance in cash plus what she earned part time, that was it.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Where is that carved in stone?


I said "for me".....in my opinion..... as far as I'm concerned...... The way it works in my family, and the way I was brought up, the man foots the bill on a date. It's what I expect my boys to do, and it's what I did when I was growing up. My wife and I have even given our boys cash when they didn't have enough to take their girlfriend out.

So, where is it carved in stone? In my house, that's where.

I know that is tough to understand for someone like you Gerry who wants to keep women subservient but some of us actually believe women are equals.


another example of your ignorance when it comes to me, and a glaring condemnation on you wanting to make women less than what they are and deserve, by making them "equal".
 

Sons of Liberty

Walks on Water
Aug 24, 2010
1,284
0
36
Evil Empire
The British colonists in North America were hardly any different in being taxed without being represented in parliament.

Most Britons back at home had the same predicament.

Well then you just sucked it up and we didn't.

Americans don't get just how destructive the American Revolution was to their hopes of world dominance. If they had not resorted to the gun in 1775 they would now own North America from Mexico to Nunavut.

The whole manifest destiny, world dominance thing is all in your demented fringe left head.
 

tober

Time Out
Aug 6, 2013
752
0
16
okay fair enough, thanks for the explanation.

I see it as denigrating both male and female because of the way I view relationships. I believe them to be a partnership and that the one strongest in any given situation should be the one to lead for that piece. When I have heard the term used it has meant the guy is a weakling if he defers to the woman. It was kind of a he-man, thump the chest kind of usage.

I do remember the tampon incident and I do not believe it lessens Charles in any way. He was forced due to his position to marry Diana; unlike Philip who married the love of his life as did Queen Elizabeth. Nice for them...not so nice for Charles. Phillip had the talk with him many times until he gave in. He never loved her, he never pretended to love her. His love was always Camilla so to call or view him weak, he is not. He did what he had been brain washed into believing was his duty. In the end, he won.

That is neither weak nor p ussywhipped.

As to the interaction you witnessed between two members you are new here and thus have misinterpreted the interaction. Many of us have known each other for many many years both on here and various forums. It is a safe place to joke in a flirtation manner since we are all of varying ages and backgrounds and know each other well. It's a friendly place once you have been here for a while. Even drop down drag out fighting leads to passive respectful response either down the road or in another thread.

Thank you. I went for a coffee and a drive this afternoon (scouting for geese) and I was thinking about this site. In particular I was thinking about your response to my "pw" expression and regretting that it offended you. I had honestly never thought of it in the way you pointed out - that of the red neck berating "his woman". I see your point.

I also hadn't thought of the Prince Charles situation the way you explained it. Another point to you. Since Dianna I have often thought of what a horrible family the British Royalty must be. I recall reading once of an "average" weekday family supper, where all family members had to attend in "the uniform of the day" and be piped to the dinner table by a Sergeant Major piper as though it was a formal military mess dinner. It significantly altered my opinion of QE II to that of an unfortunate old demagogue. It helps to explain her obviously dysfunctional children. There is a large conspiracy community out there who think that Prince Phillip ordered the killing of Dianna. I was first told of the conspiracy by my elderly mother, a monarchist and a small "c" conservative for whom it took years to accept the possibility that the assassination of JFK might have been a conspiracy. Go figure.

As to the membership, I have found more support than is evident here in some of the arguments. I'm willing to accept your position. I do hold to a conspiracy theory on the Internet. I believe the US conservatives, far more than others, gang up and try to either destroy what they think of as liberal sites or convert them. Often they will drive off everyone else and not support the site afterwards, just carry on elsewhere to start over. I am quite willing to oppose them, because IMO their agenda is to stifle freedom of expression across society.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
I said "for me".....in my opinion..... as far as I'm concerned...... The way it works in my family, and the way I was brought up, the man foots the bill on a date. It's what I expect my boys to do, and it's what I did when I was growing up. My wife and I have even given our boys cash when they didn't have enough to take their girlfriend out.

So, where is it carved in stone? In my house, that's where.

That's great Gerry, maybe you have more to prove than I do. If a woman wanted to buy my dinner I'd let her rather than risk insulting her. There's generally another opportunity to even up.

P.S. This thread seems to have gotten slightly removed from Charlie! -:)
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
That's great Gerry, maybe you have more to prove than I do. If a woman wanted to buy my dinner I'd let her rather than risk insulting her. There's generally another opportunity to even up.

If she was to be insulted, then she wasn't worth it in the first place. Time to move on.

P.S. This thread seems to have gotten slightly removed from Charlie! -:)

For me, thinking about Charles as King is just too damn depressing. As far as I'm concerned, when Queen Elizabeth leaves, Charles should decline and pass the crown to William.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
For me, thinking about Charles as King is just too damn depressing. As far as I'm concerned, when Queen Elizabeth leaves, Charles should decline and pass the crown to William.

Maybe, but I can see one slight tiny problem with that.......................................Charles may not agree and he has first choice.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Maybe, but I can see one slight tiny problem with that.......................................Charles may not agree and he has first choice.


I said, "as far as I'm concerned". That makes it my own personal opinion, not necessarily something that will happen.
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
Thank you. I went for a coffee and a drive this afternoon (scouting for geese) and I was thinking about this site. In particular I was thinking about your response to my "pw" expression and regretting that it offended you. I had honestly never thought of it in the way you pointed out - that of the red neck berating "his woman". I see your point.

I also hadn't thought of the Prince Charles situation the way you explained it. Another point to you. Since Dianna I have often thought of what a horrible family the British Royalty must be. I recall reading once of an "average" weekday family supper, where all family members had to attend in "the uniform of the day" and be piped to the dinner table by a Sergeant Major piper as though it was a formal military mess dinner. It significantly altered my opinion of QE II to that of an unfortunate old demagogue. It helps to explain her obviously dysfunctional children. There is a large conspiracy community out there who think that Prince Phillip ordered the killing of Dianna. I was first told of the conspiracy by my elderly mother, a monarchist and a small "c" conservative for whom it took years to accept the possibility that the assassination of JFK might have been a conspiracy. Go figure.

As to the membership, I have found more support than is evident here in some of the arguments. I'm willing to accept your position. I do hold to a conspiracy theory on the Internet. I believe the US conservatives, far more than others, gang up and try to either destroy what they think of as liberal sites or convert them. Often they will drive off everyone else and not support the site afterwards, just carry on elsewhere to start over. I am quite willing to oppose them, because IMO their agenda is to stifle freedom of expression across society.
Thanks tober. I appreciate the response and the thought you put forth into your posts and appreciate your input. I do not always agree with your posts but frankly those posts that I disagree with are the ones that I think about the most. And they do change the way I view issues. And that is why I return here repeatedly. There is that old adage I have always liked: if two men in business always agree, then one of them is unnecessary.

My parents were British immigrants and I was raised with positive feelings toward the monarchy although my parents had a very realistic approach to things including that. I have a soft spot for Charles because the year he got married it was all about Di. I specifically remember their honeymoon interview. They were in Scotland and the press said something about being madly in love. Charles hesitated and said something like: yes, what ever that means. I remember turning to my mum and saying: my god he doesn't love her. Her response was, doesn't matter what he wants or doesn't want, it is his duty. i said but that is wrong and her reply was, of course it is wrong, but it is the way of the world. I thought how terrible for both of them because she looked at him like he was her god.

It's the human condition isn't it? We don't always dig too deeply. For Diana dinners were torture because she was anorexic/bulimic. She would binge and purge and Charles just couldn't wrap his head around it. She was messed from the get go poor young thing. I don't know about the conspiracies but anything is possible. I don't know it is probable but if we can think it, then it can be. If it can be, then it is possible.

I will think deeper about the American political point and what it means.

Thanks
 
Last edited:

tober

Time Out
Aug 6, 2013
752
0
16
For some people, if a woman holds any power, it is plain and simply, because she is female. Not because she is, in fact, intelligent, a partner to that man, etc. If a man defers to a woman in any way shape or form, it's based on sex, not equality. Some people can't get past the 'gender war' mentality. It's a shame. It makes them small.

Fortunately the whole world isn't imprisoned in the 'poor me radical feminist' mould. Some people are aggressive Alpha personalities, bullies who butt in to challenge others and assert themselves in a pecking order pissing contest. Often there will be a rationalization to make it appear that the other needed to be put in their place. This is logical, because to the Alpha dog any new player must be dominated and put in the place the bully wants on the pecking order.

How do we tell if that is what it is? Watch to see if the Alpha dog comes back every day to see if the victim is willing to surrender. If the first shot between the Alpha dog and the target every day is the Alpha dog trying to piss on the target's leg, the Alpha dog is picking a dominance fight. What can the target do? Stand on the Alpha dog's rug every day so Alpha dog pisses on their own mattress, then point at the stain.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Sal;1802309]you'd best duck ya brat. :lol:

I do think the stigma still applies at times. I do not believe we are quite out of the cave yet and any attempt to place us back in that subordinate role seems to set me off even when it is not meant that way or is a joke. I was brought up by parents who lived out WWII. I did not know women were not equal until I moved out of the house.
Passive and subordinate are two different things active and overbearing are two things as well, aren't they? Naturally women are superior certainly not equal. Of course there are many instances when this natural rule is not followed, but generally it has been adhered to, there is no other factual explanation necessary, the continued survival of the species speaks for itself, in my opinion.


Looking back on it now I can see my parents shared responsibility within the home to a large degree but the greater burden was still on the female.
The home, cave, hearth is the womans domain naturally, it is a nest for babies, men serve a subordinate position in that case I guess, someone has to hunt the rabbits.

There are many countries in the world where women are not so lucky as we are here. Thus, I do tend to be a tad reactive. :D
There are many countries in the world where men are killed in the thousands looking for rabbits.


so you don't wine and dine a woman at all, you choose to share a meal with her

that's fine as long as your salaries are equal, if unequal the higher wage earner should pay a larger portion of the bill once it is established who can best afford to do so....

that my friend is equal
It's all about money with you ain't it?
Of course that is a very simple idea, maybe it hasn't been mostly true for hundreds of thousands of years.What the hell is wrong with a nice warm sun facing cave overlooking the water hole and close to the hunting and shopping?
 
Last edited:

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Sal;1802309]men serve a subordinate position in that case I guess, someone has to hunt the rabbits.



There are many countries in the world where men are killed in the thousands looking for rabbits.

Rabbits!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A real man is out hunting moose, buffalo, grizzly bear.
 

tober

Time Out
Aug 6, 2013
752
0
16
The whole manifest destiny, world dominance thing is all in your demented fringe left head.

("Sons of Liberty"? LOL. Some people are too stupid to get away with trying to float the Big Lie.)

Dubya stated in 2006 that manifest destiny was still Republican policy. The "New American Century" can be seen at

http://www.newamericancentury.org/
The Project for the New American Century is a non-profit educational organization dedicated to a few fundamental propositions: that American leadership is good both for America and for the world; and that such leadership requires military strength, diplomatic energy and commitment to moral principle.

The Project for the New American Century intends, through issue briefs, research papers, advocacy journalism, conferences, and seminars, to explain what American world leadership entails. It will also strive to rally support for a vigorous and principled policy of American international involvement and to stimulate useful public debate on foreign and defense policy and America's role in the world.
William Kristol, Chairman

Of course, dubya said lots of other things too, such as

50. "I promise you I will listen to what has been said here, even though I wasn't here." —at the President's Economic Forum in Waco, Texas, Aug. 13, 2002

49. "We spent a lot of time talking about Africa, as we should. Africa is a nation that suffers from incredible disease." —Gothenburg, Sweden, June 14, 2001

48. "You teach a child to read, and he or her will be able to pass a literacy test.'' —Townsend, Tenn., Feb. 21, 2001 (What happened to George?)

47. "We both use Colgate toothpaste." —after a reporter asked what he had in common with British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Camp David, Md., Feb. 23, 2001

46. "Tribal sovereignty means that; it's sovereign. I mean, you're a — you've been given sovereignty, and you're viewed as a sovereign entity. And therefore the relationship between the federal government and tribes is one between sovereign entities." —Washington, D.C., Aug. 6, 2004

45. "I glance at the headlines just to kind of get a flavor for what's moving. I rarely read the stories, and get briefed by people who are probably read the news themselves." —Washington, D.C., Sept. 21, 2003

44. "I'm the commander — see, I don't need to explain — I do not need to explain why I say things. That's the interesting thing about being president." —as quoted in Bob Woodward's Bush at War

43. "I am here to make an announcement that this Thursday, ticket counters and airplanes will fly out of Ronald Reagan Airport." —Washington, D.C., Oct. 3, 2001

42. "The war on terror involves Saddam Hussein because of the nature of Saddam Hussein, the history of Saddam Hussein, and his willingness to terrorize himself." —Grand Rapids, Mich., Jan. 29, 2003

41. "I saw a poll that said the right track/wrong track in Iraq was better than here in America. It's pretty darn strong. I mean, the people see a better future." —Washington, D.C., Sept. 23, 2004

40. "Oh, no, we're not going to have any casualties." —discussing the Iraq war with Christian Coalition founder Pat Robertson, as quoted by Robertson

39. "I hear there's rumors on the Internets that we're going to have a draft." —presidential debate, St. Louis, Mo., Oct. 8, 2004 (Watch video)

38. "Haven't we already given money to rich people? Why are we going to do it again?" —to economic advisers discussing a second round of tax cuts, as quoted by former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neil, Washington, D.C., Nov. 26, 2002

37. "We need an energy bill that encourages consumption." —Trenton, N.J., Sept. 23, 2002

36. "After standing on the stage, after the debates, I made it very plain, we will not have an all-volunteer army. And yet, this week — we will have an all-volunteer army!" —Daytona Beach, Fla., Oct. 16, 2004 (Watch video)

35. "Do you have blacks, too?" —to Brazilian President Fernando Cardoso, Washington, D.C., Nov. 8, 2001

34. "This foreign policy stuff is a little frustrating." —as quoted by the New York Daily News, April 23, 2002

33. "I got to know Ken Lay when he was head of the — what they call the Governor's Business Council in Texas. He was a supporter of Ann Richards in my run in 1994. And she had named him the head of the Governor's Business Council. And I decided to leave him in place, just for the sake of continuity. And that's when I first got to know Ken and worked with Ken." —attempting to distance himself from his biggest political patron, Enron Chairman Ken Lay, whom he nicknamed "Kenny Boy," Washington, D.C., Jan. 10, 2002

32. "It is white." —after being asked by a child in Britain what the White House was like, July 19, 2001

31. "I couldn't imagine somebody like Osama bin Laden understanding the joy of Hanukkah." —at a White House menorah lighting ceremony, Washington, D.C., Dec. 10, 2001

30. "For every fatal shooting, there were roughly three non-fatal shootings. And, folks, this is unacceptable in America. It's just unacceptable. And we're going to do something about it." —Philadelphia, Penn., May 14, 2001

29. "I don't know why you're talking about Sweden. They're the neutral one. They don't have an army." —during a Dec. 2002 Oval Office meeting with Rep. Tom Lantos, as reported by the New York Times

28. "You forgot Poland." —to Sen. John Kerry during the first presidential debate, after Kerry failed to mention Poland's contributions to the Iraq war coalition, Miami, Fla., Sept. 30, 2004

27. "I'm the master of low expectations." —aboard Air Force One, June 4, 2003

26. "I'm also not very analytical. You know I don't spend a lot of time thinking about myself, about why I do things." —aboard Air Force One, June 4, 2003

25. "I know what I believe. I will continue to articulate what I believe and what I believe — I believe what I believe is right." —Rome, Italy, July 22, 2001

24. "We need to counter the shockwave of the evildoer by having individual rate cuts accelerated and by thinking about tax rebates." —Washington, D.C. Oct. 4, 2001

23. "People say, how can I help on this war against terror? How can I fight evil? You can do so by mentoring a child; by going into a shut-in's house and say I love you." —Washington, D.C., Sept. 19, 2002

22. "I wish you'd have given me this written question ahead of time so I could plan for it…I'm sure something will pop into my head here in the midst of this press conference, with all the pressure of trying to come up with answer, but it hadn't yet….I don't want to sound like I have made no mistakes. I'm confident I have. I just haven't — you just put me under the spot here, and maybe I'm not as quick on my feet as I should be in coming up with one." —President George W. Bush, after being asked to name the biggest mistake he had made, Washington, D.C., April 3, 2004

21. "The really rich people figure out how to dodge taxes anyway." —explaining why high taxes on the rich are a failed strategy, Annandale, Va., Aug. 9, 2004

20. "My plan reduces the national debt, and fast. So fast, in fact, that economists worry that we're going to run out of debt to retire." —radio address, Feb. 24, 2001

19. "You know, when I was one time campaigning in Chicago, a reporter said, 'Would you ever have a deficit?' I said, 'I can't imagine it, but there would be one if we had a war, or a national emergency, or a recession.' Never did I dream we'd get the trifecta." —Houston, Texas, June 14, 2002 (There is no evidence Bush ever made any such statement, despite recounting the trifecta line repeatedly in 2002. A search by the Washington Post revealed that the three caveats were brought up before the 2000 campaign — by Al Gore.)

18. "See, free nations are peaceful nations. Free nations don't attack each other. Free nations don't develop weapons of mass destruction." —Milwaukee, Wis., Oct. 3, 2003

17. "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." —State of the Union Address, Jan. 28, 2003, making a claim that administration officials knew at the time to be false

16. "In Iraq, no doubt about it, it's tough. It's hard work. It's incredibly hard." —repeating the phrases "hard work," "working hard," "hard choices," and other "hard"-based verbiage 22 times in his first debate with Sen. John Kerry

15. "The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him." —Washington, D.C., Sept. 13, 2001

14. "I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority." —Washington, D.C., March 13, 2002

13. "But all in all, it's been a fabulous year for Laura and me." —summing up his first year in office, three months after the 9/11 attacks, Washington, D.C., Dec. 20, 2001

12. "I try to go for longer runs, but it's tough around here at the White House on the outdoor track. It's sad that I can't run longer. It's one of the saddest things about the presidency." —interview with "Runners World," Aug. 2002

11. "Can we win? I don't think you can win it." —after being asked whether the war on terror was winnable, "Today" show interview, Aug. 30, 2004

10. "I just want you to know that, when we talk about war, we're really talking about peace." —Washington, D.C. June 18, 2002

9. "I trust God speaks through me. Without that, I couldn't do my job." —to a group of Amish he met with privately, July 9, 2004

8. "Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed." —speaking underneath a "Mission Accomplished" banner aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, May 1, 2003

7. “We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories … And we'll find more weapons as time goes on. But for those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong, we found them." —Washington, D.C., May 30, 2003

6. "Those weapons of mass destruction have got to be somewhere!" —President George W. Bush, joking about his administration's failure to find WMDs in Iraq as he narrated a comic slideshow during the Radio & TV Correspondents' Association dinner, Washington, D.C., March 24, 2004

5. "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." —Washington, D.C., Dec. 19, 2000

4. "There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again." —Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 (Watch video)

3. "Too many good docs are getting out of the business. Too many OB-GYNs aren't able to practice their love with women all across this country." —Poplar Bluff, Mo., Sept. 6, 2004 (Watch video)

2. "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." —Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004 (Watch video)

1. "My answer is bring them on." —on Iraqi insurgents attacking U.S. forces, Washington, D.C., July 3, 2003

 
Last edited:

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
I said "for me".....in my opinion..... as far as I'm concerned...... The way it works in my family, and the way I was brought up, the man foots the bill on a date. It's what I expect my boys to do, and it's what I did when I was growing up. My wife and I have even given our boys cash when they didn't have enough to take their girlfriend out.

So, where is it carved in stone? In my house, that's where.




another example of your ignorance when it comes to me, and a glaring condemnation on you wanting to make women less than what they are and deserve, by making them "equal".

ROFLMAO!!!!! Toooooo funny! In one breath you try to keep women subservient and men superior with your 'carved in stone' attitude of men always paying for whatever and then your next line you try to tell me I make women less than equal by saying they are equal. :lol::lol::lol::roll:

You are a fricking caveman G. You're attitude stinks and you are teaching your sons to be cavemen just like you. I feel sorry for any girl they date or marry if they don't break away from your outdated, chauvinistic mentality. Hopefully they meet a strong woman who will teach them she is quite capable of paying her own way and won't allow herself to be treated as anything less than a complete equal in all ways including dating.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Rabbits!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A real man is out hunting moose, buffalo, grizzly bear.

You can't drag a moose and flowers along on a date, rabbits demonstrate our best intentions, the moose and buffalo are implied, pending the outcome of the rabbits appraisal. How many times did you drag a buffalo to some pretty girls front door?