Only Nicolle Flats is flat. The rest is wavy gravy. LOL And yes we have mountains.
Are they called Cypress Hills?
The highest point of which is actually in AB. -
Only Nicolle Flats is flat. The rest is wavy gravy. LOL And yes we have mountains.
They are mountains. Same with Duck mtn.Are they called Cypress Hills?
They are mountains. Same with Duck mtn.
Prince Charles cheated on Princess Diana. How smart could he be?
lol Exactly.It is not so much that he cheated, it is what he cheated with.
Hey, Prince Phlip is a howl n a half. Leave him be.You guys should read up on his dad and what he thinks should be done about you peasants.
Yes, some people even still refuse to accept that the Earth isn't flat, despite the evidence to the contrary. Those photos from space must be faked? Deniers are people who are so obtuse as to be impervious to evidence and reasoning.
Really? You finally accepted that Earth is ovoid and not flat? Well, congrats, Blacklaff! Party on, dude!Yeah. Those people are even weirder, just about, than the Warmists.
It is not so much that he cheated, it is what he cheated with.
Kind of gives meaning to the old saying "homely as a mud fence". -![]()
The difference between a hill and a mountain is entirely subjective and usually quite localized. To me, a mountain is a prominence that has a treeline as above a certain altitude, trees won't grow. If a prominence has trees on its summit, it's a hill or in case of terrain that has no trees anywhere (like the M.E.) mountains are higher than about 4100 meters above sealevel.
It is marked up in 0.5 degree units as detailed in the product specifications above.
You can read this thermometer to an accuracy of 0.25 degrees Celsius; that is if the mercury doesn’t line up with a mark but sits between 2 of them, then the best you could read off would be, say, 0.25 degrees Celsius.
If you represented each year with a glass of water whose water temperature matched the temperature anomaly in the table and then used the thermometer above to measure the temperature, you would not be able to read any differences between the 10 glasses of water.
lmao That's great!I once heard the NFL described as the Diana of pro-football.. all glamour, proper posture and air (head).. the CFL as the Camilla.. ugly, unkempt, and earthy.. but a hell of a ride in comparison.. a lady's prancing horse versus and a bucking bronco.![]()
Right; not loquacious, Locutus.Concise, yet eloquent, but not loquacious.
Right; not loquacious, Locutus.![]()
Why would anyone think of reading a global average from a single thermometer as a useful exercise at all...the above is a fundamental ignorance of scientific terms. The thermometer is accurate to 0.05°C it's even stated explicitly in the screen shot of the thermometer... the accuracy is not 0.25°C. I agree that it would be hard to see an annual global average temperature anomaly on a thermometer which has such poor precision. But consider that the satellites which measure an analog of surface temperature to a much higher degree of precision than 0.25°C, only differ from the thermometer based surface temperature records by about 0.03°C/decade when estimating the global temperature trend. The resolution of UAH and RSS satellite reported temperatures is 0.001°C. That's a pretty good confirmation, and honestly who really cares if 2005 was 0.01°C cooler than 2010. The only people who seem to care about measuring from peaks instead of over entire records are the ones who think that a flat global air temperature record is evidence of a stall in global warming, despite clear evidence that the planet continues to accumulate heat (90% in the oceans) which should be expected given that there is still a measured imbalance (ranging between +0.5 to 1.0 W/m^2) of energy in and energy out at the top of the atmosphere....
That would spoil the movie. Do yo also like to dispense with foreplay? The girls must love you. lolIf you had clear evidence you would have played it first and avoided the blather about thermometers.