The problem here is that you're attempting to address the issue with a crusading ideologue.
There is no amount of logic, discussion or debate that will sway the already preconceived outcome that buddy needs
Political commentary on court verdicts hurts views of justice system: lawyers
- Thread starter Colpy
- Start date
The problem here is that you're attempting to address the issue with a crusading ideologue.
There is no amount of logic, discussion or debate that will sway the already preconceived outcome that buddy needs
I am referring to hoid's incessant declarations that racism was a factual cause of the incident and the jury's findings
It wasn't meant as a shout but to emphasis, Stanley is pretty much guilty of unsafe storage on a few of his rifles, it was reported that they found them leaned up on a wall. His handguns I believe were reported to be in a box storage not sure if locked or not.
This needs to be said over and over. Hoid is a contrarian and a troll. He rarely provides proof for his arguments. He gets his jollys from twisting the words of others. He is painfully easy to catch in a lie. He deals with being caught by ignoring the individual, or denying that he said what he was caught posting.
He strikes me as a spoiled 14 year old. I invite you to check his posts. He isn't worth trying to reason with. Like some others here, he is a childish troll.
Do you think storage rules should be as strict on a farm as they should be in a house in the city?
Contrary to you he usually makes some sense!
That is the defendant's right to dismiss any juror he chooses for whatever reason. He has a right to be heard by his peers. I think the crown can also dismiss jurors.
Personally I think Native people are no more thrilled about sitting on a jury then any one else .
Appears this decision runs counter to justyns'strategy of harvesting fn votes not to mention a little ice being tossed on his pc fervour. I'm curious why a handful of canucks sitting on a jury are not considered the accused peers, canadians all. Wish justyn would clear this up and reveal his fairer judicial system, maybe jury foremen will hafta submit verdicts to pmo for approval before the judge reads it. Mandating jury populace favour the accuseds ethnic profile not only challenges libs diversity gospel but would unlock pandoras' box.
I think it was a matter of Justin opening his mouth before he engaged his brain.
Politicians aren't supposed to render a personal opinion of specific trial verdicts. Any trouble that comes as the result of the court decision must be borne, in part, by the PM's office. I've no doubt that his advisors have spoken to him about it, but the damage has been done.
Politicians aren't supposed to render a personal opinion of specific trial verdicts. Any trouble that comes as the result of the court decision must be borne, in part, by the PM's office. I've no doubt that his advisors have spoken to him about it, but the damage has been done.
You obviously have a lot to learn about the justice system. It's not perfect by any means but it's not going to be fixed by the average yokel on the street who has had no formal education in the discipline of law.
This is only your opinion, and supported by any facts.
Details of the jury are is not public information.
And no I don't accept the racist rants of the family, crying about all white jury.
There is enough intermixing, some you can't tell anymore.
So, no facts, as usual.
Up to 12 for each side can be dismissed without justification.
500 people did not even show up for jury call. Have to ask why that is.
It's only me who is mentioning the lack of first nations on the jury?
You need to grow up.
Everyone in the country is talking about it including the minister of justice and the premier of Saskatchewan and the Prime Minister of Canada.
I can see where all these years of climate change denial comes in handy around here.
You need to grow up.
Everyone in the country is talking about it including the minister of justice and the premier of Saskatchewan and the Prime Minister of Canada.
I can see where all these years of climate change denial comes in handy around here.
Last edited:
And the Minister of Justice and the PM should be slapped in the mouth.
As well as the premier.
The jurors can not (by law) defend themselves as they are labelled as racists.
It is obvious the idiots listed above are criticized a specific jury decision.
AND the Supreme Court has already weighed in on FN presence on juries, just back in 2015.
The usual stupididy and inappropriate behaviour we have come to expect from this gov't.
You would have been disqualified as a Juror Cliff.
From
Question 6 on the Juror questionnaire:
https://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/courts/jury/instructions.php
Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
Possession of 30 grams or less of cannabis (marihuana) or 1 gram or less of cannabis resin — Section 4(5)
All other Criminal Code or Controlled Drugs and Substances Act offences can be prosecuted by way of indictment and you should therefore answer “Yes”.
That's you Cliff.
From
Question 6 on the Juror questionnaire:
https://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/courts/jury/instructions.php
Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
Possession of 30 grams or less of cannabis (marihuana) or 1 gram or less of cannabis resin — Section 4(5)
All other Criminal Code or Controlled Drugs and Substances Act offences can be prosecuted by way of indictment and you should therefore answer “Yes”.
That's you Cliff.