This Thread is about Palin in 2012. Lets take it back onto the Topic. Thank You.
For sure, there are still a lot of unanswered question here, such as the "glass ceiling".
This Thread is about Palin in 2012. Lets take it back onto the Topic. Thank You.
OK, let's see...how about this?
I think Sara Palin would make a great President. I like her refreshing, down to earth approach. She seems to be able to relate to "common people" quite well. She has compiled a fair amount of "life experience" which only adds to her list of strengths, as far as I'm concerned.
She is decisive, clear-minded, and firm in her beliefs.
Her political experience in important offices is quite good. Governor of Alaska is a big job, especially considering that state's "uniqueness"...oil, remoteness, and most definitely on the environment stage.
She's also about the best looking moose hunter I've even seen. Hey, I'm a man and I appreciate a good looking woman on my TV screen. I think she's gorgeous but then, I've always been attracted to women with brains and beauty. It's a very appealing combination.
No doubt about it, she wouldn't be a bad president, I would just have concerns with her ability to handle herself (and those giving her a hard time) in Washington.
If being a good-looking woman was the only condition necessary for becoming a presidential candidate, Sarah Palin would win hands down. She is gorgeous.
Thankfully, there are far more important criteria that come into play such as having the ability to string a complete sentence together and have it make sense. Sarah fumbles, mumbles and stumbles time and again.
I made a point of listening to her when she decided to withdraw as Gov of Alaska, hoping that I would learn something. No such luck.
Now she is popping up all over the media plugging her book and is still having trouble making any sense.
"i see you still haven't come up with an answer to my question. So let me make one last attempt. Exactly which glass ceilings did Joan of Arc break?"''
And you still have not come up with any reasonable argument or fact that Obama was more qualified to be elected President - with absolutely NOTHING in his political background - tha Sarah Palin.
So she has about as much in common with Joan of Arc as she does with Hitler, Stalin, Joseph McCarthy and Brigham Young.
"She decided to give birth to a developmentally challenged child (I hardly think it was a courageous decision, she was simply following her interpretation of the Bible). How does that tell us if she so a good or bad politician?"
Good bet: If Sarah Palin had decided to abort her developmentally challenged child,
and especially if she had encouraged her daughter to abort her child she would be your hero.
Quite so. But her followers, her worshippers have a lot in common with the followers, the worshippers of Joan of Arc.
So sorry, countryboy, with SP all you get is style. She lacks substance and credibility - big time.Oh c'mon now...I've heard her complete lots of sentences in a very coherent manner. You're just pickin' on her, aren't you? :lol:
Maybe her strategy on selling the book is to not say too much in the plugs, thus leaving the audience begging for more details, and thus motivated to rush out and buy the book! (See, she is pretty smart!) ;-)
You're right on the good-looking part! It ain't the only qualification, but it's a good one.
But aren't we focusing a bit too much on style and not enough on substance? It's just a question...
No doubt about it, she wouldn't be a bad president, I would just have concerns with her ability to handle herself (and those giving her a hard time) in Washington.
Quite so. But her followers, her worshippers have a lot in common with the followers, the worshippers of Joan of Arc.
So sorry, countryboy, with SP all you get is style. She lacks substance and credibility - big time.
She had a chance to regain a bit of ground after the election but decided, without notice, to simply stop being Gov of Alaska. She never did give any clear, concrete reason for doing so.
But then, that's just my opinion. ;-)
Oh c'mon now...I've heard her complete lots of sentences in a very coherent manner. You're just pickin' on her, aren't you? :lol:
Maybe her strategy on selling the book is to not say too much in the plugs, thus leaving the audience begging for more details, and thus motivated to rush out and buy the book! (See, she is pretty smart!) ;-)
You're right on the good-looking part! It ain't the only qualification, but it's a good one.
But aren't we focusing a bit too much on style and not enough on substance? It's just a question...
In a way, I do hope she becomes the president. Can you imagine the fun we will have in this forum ridiculing and making fun of her? What happened to Bush will pale by comparison.
For satire, sarcasm, parody, comedy, she will be a much better fodder than Obama ever will be. USA will become the laughing stock of the world, once again (as it was during Bush times).
Yes, I understood that the first time you explained it, but how does that make Palin herself, similar to Joan of Arc herself.
That is because there is no substance, countryboy. What substance there is, is the same warmed up extreme right wing rhetoric. That is why 70% of USA does not think that she will make a good president.
She is extremely popular with the far right Republican base, but that is it. That is why I think she has a good chance of winning the nomination. But unless the economy is totally in the tank in 2012 (which looks unlikely as of now), Obama will win against her by a landslide.
What's the difference between a worshipper and a follower?