Some are right to left others left to right. The words don't change, just the the hypocrites that use them.
Oxford Debate: Islam is a Religion of Peace
- Thread starter Colpy
- Start date
Some are right to left others left to right. The words don't change, just the the hypocrites that use them.
Eagle is too stupid to remember the many photos I've posted of Hitler worshiping in a Catholic church with the hierarchy making the Nazi salute. If I recall correctly, Eagle said "broken record" back then.
Colpy
Hall of Fame Member
14,932 since Nov 2005
Saint John, N.B.
#11Re: Oxford Debate: Islam is a Religion of Peace
9 hours ago
Quote: Originally Posted by gopher
He lived long enough to know of Hitler and WWI. Refresh my memory, what did he say about those who worship the Prince of Peace and their warmongering.First of all, and for the nth time, Hitler and Naziism were PAGAN , not Christian.
He played Christian to the people, but he was anything but.
Read Metasas' book on Bonhoeffer.
In killing Jews I am doing God's handiwork - I am and will always be a Catholic.
~ Hitler
Playing to the audience.
Ever see his plan for the German church??
The cross replaced with the Swastika, a copy of Mein Kampf the only thing allowed on the altar.......
Were I home, I would give you chapter and verse, but I do not have my reference book with me.....
Believe me, Hitler was Catholic like Charlie McCarthy was flesh and blood.
Only a facade for the audience.
What? All of them?
So they were sympathetic to the officially established Christian church in England? My God, that's EVIL.
So what? I'd rather them symapthise with this church or the Church of England than sympathise with the Catholic Church child-buggerers, the most evil of all Christian churches.
Is that the same British aristocracy which was amongst a huge group of people and organisations which protested against a planned tour of England by the South Africa cricket team in the 1970s?
By the way, what has this thread got to do with the British aristocracy anyway? I thought it was supposed to be about a series of university debates about Islam.
This is the kind of garbage they "debate" in what they like to think of as the finest university in the world?
There are many Muslims who commit non-peaceful acts. Ergo, Islam is either not peaceful or not effective.
Gee, that was tough. Can I have my stupid-*** gown now?
There are many Muslims who commit non-peaceful acts. Ergo, Islam is either not peaceful or not effective.
Gee, that was tough. Can I have my stupid-*** gown now?
Well then, what is Christianity? With over 25,000 different sects, which one truly represents what true Christianity is?
Particularly since one needs only look at the conduct of Christians to easily demonstrate that Christianity is either not peaceful or not effective. Or both.
Kinda partial to the Quakers myself.
And no priests, bishops, preachers, or other shamans. Mentally disciplined, aside from that whole believing-in-a-fairy tale/revenge fantasy thing.
What do you have against shamans?
Crazy Horse was a mystic
He knew the secret of the trance
Sitting Bull the great apostle
of the Ghost Dance
Robby Robertson
Why do these masterdebaters and the crowd here not mention the Talmudic origins of both the Christian and Islamic constructs? Abramic lunacy the whole lot of it.
When are you going to string yourself up by the tits and do a Sundance for us Cliffy?
Read what Christ had to say.
So I can look at the racist and bigoted conduct of First Nations and draw the conclusion that that is what First Nations are all about?:roll:
That doesn't follow from what I said. That you are trying in encouraging. That you are failing, less so.
Maybe he'll understand the second time? That is hard to say.
I tried to push it from my life but it only came back 10 fold and with clarity.
Trying to not believe was the best thing that ever happened to me Spiritually.
Yes it does follow. That you are too simple minded to understand the implications of your statements is not surprising, otherwise, you would not have made them in the first place.
Yes, your ability to reason logically makes your use of argumentum ad hominem unsurprising.
If you have a specific question about native spirituality or the conduct of followers thereof, ask it. "What they're all about" is too broad and nonspecific to be useful. Says something about you, though.