This good discussion finally reached the depths of name calling and labelling
like the other discussions that breathe a sense of personal passions into the
argument.
First Hitler was a Catholic, Mussolini was a Catholic, and many of the higher
ranking officials of the Hitler Regime were Catholics. They were also political
pagans of sorts but they still celebrated the church holidays.
As for the others mentioned, well the Dutch Reformed Church has a history of
apartheid, the Southern Baptist Convention and the Democratic Party of the old
South had a lot in common. It was once the Republicans against Slavery and
the Democrats in the south administering it. That is how Lincoln freed the slaves.
He was a Republican.
The high society in Britain were in fact for Hitler cause he didn't like the Jews.
Then think about this, if the wealth of the highest order didn't like the Jews then
the Jews didn't run everything.
Even Pope Pius the twelfth was friends with the dictators of Europe. After the war
the Vatican played a great role in Odessa helping the Nazis get to South America.
The King of England who left the throne behind was also a great buddy of Hitler and
some say Neville Chamberlain's wife has shares in Krupp the German steel works.
As for the Muslims, they have no central figure to unify them in a direction of the faith.
therefore they are still warring tribes in a societal world and they bring anything but
peace. They are in fact what Christianity behaved like in the Middle Ages and believe
me Peace was never mentioned back then. It was about conquest.
Our unwillingness to accept the reality of who these people are will be the measure that
fulfills the prediction of Nostradamus that we will be at war with Islam in the twenty first
century. Doesn't sound like peace is coming anytime soon