The problem is when we borrow money into existence, but the interest charged does not get created, it magically must be born of that principle that was created by the creation of that debt in the first place, but no, in reality, as any dope dealing, gun running, money laundering illegal mafia boss will tell you:
If you borrow from him, as we do, and have to pay back MORE then there actually is,
there will always be a shortfall .
No matter how much taxation there is, all that taxation does is fund the crooks who are skimming off the top
It's called a haircut
the free trade thing bullrooney did was a haircut on a bald head with a big fat side of stabintheback
...and what a good little mob barber he was...
A haircut is one thing, this being shaved bald is a whole different matter.
I showed the math that says your wrong. Look it up.
It is irrefutable.
Regards
DL
Those are mostly exempt.
Your math is defective. Go ask someone that knows a bit about taxation.
Try using gas as your test to see who is getting shafted the hardest as a % of income.
If you end with the rich, you do not know how to do math,
Regards
DL
Your math is defective. Go talk to someone that knows a bit about taxation.
That's funny; when I pointed out that poor people have to buy food, on which there is no GST, you said that it doesn't matter what the tax applies to.
Now youre commenting on what's exempt.
My point is, poor people will spend a higher proportion of their income on food, so they will pay a lower proportion of GST. You do the math, I'm sure you can find someone to help you push the buttons.
As well as the fact that the poor receive a government cheque every three months to cover their GST contributions,