Our cooling world

Walter

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,871
116
63
Zipperfish said:
Another denier demonstrates an epic math fail.
Click to expand...
100-7%of 100%=93%
93-7%of 93=86.49%
86.49%-7%of 86.49%=80.44%
80.44%-7%og86.44%=74.84%
Etcetera. Unless you subtract 100% you will approach zero but never get there.


I am too stoopid to live.
 
Walter

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,871
116
63
MHz said:
If it got smaller in the summer but still got larger in the winter is that global warming or cooling?
Click to expand...
It doesn't matter, the climate is changing and it's your fault so give your money to the gubmint.
 
Zipperfish

Zipperfish

House Member
Apr 12, 2013
3,688
0
36
Vancouver
Walter said:
100-7%of 100%=93%
93-7%of 93=86.49%
86.49%-7%of 86.49%=80.44%
80.44%-7%og86.44%=74.84%
Etcetera. Unless you subtract 100% you will approach zero but never get there.


I am too stoopid to live.
Click to expand...

You are talking about a continuous function. However the nature of reality, by all indications, is not continuous, but quantum, so as you approached zero, you'd eventually bang into the quantum boundary at which the function would become discrete. Fail strike 1.

Also, the decrease is not in reference to the present level, but compared ot the average over 1981 to 2010. Fail Strike 2.

And thirdly, ice free in this context is generally defined as less than 1 million km2. Fail Strike 3.

Thanks for showing up though.
 
MHz

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
I got myself renamed to MHz.org, now I am a deduction instead of an expense. You wouldn't belive what I can do under the 'Security' label.
 
Walter

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,871
116
63
Zipperfish said:
You are talking about a continuous function. However the nature of reality, by all indications, is not continuous, but quantum, so as you approached zero, you'd eventually bang into the quantum boundary at which the function would become discrete. Fail strike 1.

Also, the decrease is not in reference to the present level, but compared ot the average over 1981 to 2010. Fail Strike 2.

And thirdly, ice free in this context is generally defined as less than 1 million km2. Fail Strike 3.

Thanks for showing up though.
Click to expand...
You're the one who said it was decreasing by 7% per decade. You remind me of other lefties who are always right.
 
taxslave

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
Zipperfish said:
You are talking about a continuous function. However the nature of reality, by all indications, is not continuous, but quantum, so as you approached zero, you'd eventually bang into the quantum boundary at which the function would become discrete. Fail strike 1.

Also, the decrease is not in reference to the present level, but compared ot the average over 1981 to 2010. Fail Strike 2.

And thirdly, ice free in this context is generally defined as less than 1 million km2. Fail Strike 3.

Thanks for showing up though.
Click to expand...

So ice free isn't really ice free? Yet another epic fail by the AGW crowd.

Walter said:
You're the one who said it was decreasing by 7% per decade. You remind me of other lefties who are always right.
Click to expand...

Various leftie governments have proved that math is not their strong point.
 
Zipperfish

Zipperfish

House Member
Apr 12, 2013
3,688
0
36
Vancouver
Walter said:
You're the one who said it was decreasing by 7% per decade. You remind me of other lefties who are always right.
Click to expand...

Nice concession speech.

taxslave said:
Various leftie governments have proved that math is not their strong point.
Click to expand...

I might be able to take you at your word had you ever posted a single intelligent comment on global warming. But alas, this is not the case. Your strong point is wearing white pants up your nipple line and complaining about the gummint fill time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom