Ontario set to retroactively raise minimum wage

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
via sda


Ontario is set to raise the minimum wage - retroactively.

Update: a somewhat "better" explanation here.

[...] the number of minimum wage workers in Ontario more than doubled since the Liberals came to power in 2003 [...]






while we're at it:




Wynneing!
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
5
36
London, Ontario
I was reading this yesterday. Retroactive, argh! I know it's selfish but right now all I can envision is going back through payroll records for the past couple of years and how much of a pain in the butt that's going to be.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,888
126
63
That is a huge tax increase for small business and will cause bankruptcies and higher unemployment; typical Lib policy.
 

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
I was reading this yesterday. Retroactive, argh! I know it's selfish but right now all I can envision is going back through payroll records for the past couple of years and how much of a pain in the butt that's going to be.

Lets be clear, they are not talking about going back and paying people more money for work their did over the last 4 years.

They are talking about tying the minimum wage to the CPI. The "retroactive" aspect is that they are proposing to count the last 4 years of inflation into the initial starting point once the system is in place. That would bring the minimum wage up to around $11, up from $10.25.

That is a huge tax increase for small business and will cause bankruptcies and higher unemployment; typical Lib policy.

Well, no. A 1%-3% increase in labor costs that only applies to the workers who happen to be making minimum wage is a very very tiny increase in costs.

If we were going to go the other route and distribute more money through something like the EITC, we would probably be looking at a much larger tax increase.

Granted, this bump isn't large enough to significantly change things for people trying to live on minimum wage, but it does keep them from falling further behind. It also provides predictability for businesses, which is much better for them than sudden large jumps.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
When Troudeau did the wage and price control (retroactive) in '75... I had to return three months of a raise I had got.............
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
They are talking about tying the minimum wage to the CPI. The "retroactive" aspect is that they are proposing to count the last 4 years of inflation into the initial starting point once the system is in place. That would bring the minimum wage up to around $11, up from $10.25.

The CPI doesn't necessarily measure the COGS and profit margins at the wholesale/retail level. The problem being that the increase may be harmful for those companies that are at a marginal level of profitability and can not afford to up the hourly rates
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,888
126
63
When Troudeau did the wage and price control (retroactive) in '75... I had to return three months of a raise I had got.............
History is showing Turdoh's policies not to be n the interest of Canadians.

Well, no. A 1%-3% increase in labor costs that only applies to the workers who happen to be making minimum wage is a very very tiny increase in costs.
Where are you getting those numbers from? The numbers you gave ($11 from $10.25) show a 7.3% increase. A small retail outlet will have most of its employees on min.wage. That makes for a huge tax hike for the businessman.
 

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
Where are you getting those numbers from? The numbers you gave ($11 from $10.25) show a 7.3% increase. A small retail outlet will have most of its employees on min.wage. That makes for a huge tax hike for the businessman.

I am talking about the yearly increases. It is an increase for sure if you do happen to employ people at the minimum wage, but huge is a bit hyperbolic.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,888
126
63
I am talking about the yearly increases. It is an increase for sure if you do happen to employ people at the minimum wage, but huge is a bit hyperbolic.
You're lucky if you think a 7.3% increase in taxes isn't huge.
 

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
The CPI doesn't necessarily measure the COGS and profit margins at the wholesale/retail level. The problem being that the increase may be harmful for those companies that are at a marginal level of profitability and can not afford to up the hourly rates

Nobody said this is supposed to track the costs of doing business. It is supposed to track to the costs of living.

You need to think about people who are struggling to get by on the very meager minimum wage that we have now. Allowing it to get lower and lower in real terms as cost of living increases is very harmful to them.
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
5
36
London, Ontario
Lets be clear, they are not talking about going back and paying people more money for work their did over the last 4 years.

They are talking about tying the minimum wage to the CPI. The "retroactive" aspect is that they are proposing to count the last 4 years of inflation into the initial starting point once the system is in place. That would bring the minimum wage up to around $11, up from $10.25.

Not everybody gets my humour.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Nobody said this is supposed to track the costs of doing business. It is supposed to track to the costs of living.

You need to think about people who are struggling to get by on the very meager minimum wage that we have now. Allowing it to get lower and lower in real terms as cost of living increases is very harmful to them.

Business owners do not strive to amass losses and or seek to pay out of pocket to operate.

When thinking about those that are struggling to get by, you also need to assess the ramifications and affects of small business that down-size, lay off staff or simply shut their doors... No employer means no opportunity to receive a salary/wage of any kind

Those that are affected by that circumstance no longer care what the wages is (was), they are out on the street
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,844
14,419
113
Low Earth Orbit
History is showing Turdoh's policies not to be n the interest of Canadians.


Where are you getting those numbers from? The numbers you gave ($11 from $10.25) show a 7.3% increase. A small retail outlet will have most of its employees on min.wage. That makes for a huge tax hike for the businessman.

What tax would that be?
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
I am talking about the yearly increases. It is an increase for sure if you do happen to employ people at the minimum wage, but huge is a bit hyperbolic.

You're actually trying to rationalize with Walter.

Good luck buddy.

Anyway, tying minimum wage to the economy is a great - dare I say, right wing - idea.

But we all know Walt would prefer the socialist approach.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
You're actually trying to rationalize with Walter.

Good luck buddy.

Anyway, tying minimum wage to the economy is a great - dare I say, right wing - idea.

But we all know Walt would prefer the socialist approach.

So next time the economy tanks would the minimum wage go down? I'd like to see a government pull that one off.

Might be a good way to calculate government employees wages too.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
So next time the economy tanks would the minimum wage go down? I'd like to see a government pull that one off.

Might be a good way to calculate government employees wages too.

I agree with all of this, actually.

Just bear in mind we still have to consider inflation.
 

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
So next time the economy tanks would the minimum wage go down? I'd like to see a government pull that one off.

Might be a good way to calculate government employees wages too.

I guess, but that is kind of a moot point. The chances of us ever seeing the CPI go down is slim to none. We didn't even see that happen during the 2008 recession. We just saw slower inflation.

Business owners do not strive to amass losses and or seek to pay out of pocket to operate.

When thinking about those that are struggling to get by, you also need to assess the ramifications and affects of small business that down-size, lay off staff or simply shut their doors... No employer means no opportunity to receive a salary/wage of any kind

Those that are affected by that circumstance no longer care what the wages is (was), they are out on the street

If you raise it high enough to put lots of companies out of business, yes, that is bad. This is a very meager increase though, just keeping the minimum level at the same real level from year to year.

Cost of business change all the time, including the costs around maintaining employees. Companies make adjustments and carry on.

There are always costs to whatever you choose to do, but there is significant support among economists for the idea that the benefits from a reasonable increase in the minimum wage can outweigh the costs.

The facts are that over decades of research, the number of jobs actually lost due to increases in the minimum wage is very small. The elasticity of demand for workers in this price range is close to non existent.