On the Efforts to Silence Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity

Ellanjay

Council Member
Apr 11, 2020
1,739
251
83
An advertisement features Fox News personalities, including Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity, in New York City, on March 13, 2019. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
An advertisement features Fox News personalities, including Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity, in New York City, on March 13, 2019. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
VIEWPOINTS

On the Efforts to Silence Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity

Brad Bird
Brad Bird


January 23, 2021 Updated: January 23, 2021


Commentary

The American political commentators Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity of Fox News Channel are under attack, with many calling for their removal from the airwaves.

While this is perhaps a predictable extension of cancel culture’s ongoing persecution of those who uphold traditional values, the attack on these men is a particularly offensive attempt at censorship, a line in the sand.

This is because they’re among the few remaining voices in North American journalism with the courage and commitment to report views and facts that challenge the wisdom of progressive thinking. They also defended and respected President Donald J. Trump, who was endlessly and unjustly attacked and maligned by most in the media who betrayed the tradition of fair and balanced reporting.

Carlson and Hannity have been accused, among other things, of spreading “harmful propaganda and downright fiction,” according to one source.

This is rich, considering what the mainstream media has been doing in recent years. We need to understand this clearly: Carlson and Hannity make no pretense of being objective newscasters like the late Walter Cronkite or the current Lester Holt. They’re commentators who present their opinions in the same way the acclaimed William F. Buckley once did.

The problem is that people who want just the facts can’t get them anymore in the legacy media, such as the New York Times, because it’s so tainted by wokeness, political correctness, and the anti-Trump parade. So they turn to Carlson, Hannity, and others such as Laura Ingraham for relief and common sense.

I don’t know Carlson or Hannity personally, and I’m not in the pay of either of them. I have never spoken or communicated in any way with either of them. I’m an independent Canadian writer, a semi-retired reporter/editor with more than 40 years of experience, including work in war zones and positions in Canada at both large daily (Winnipeg Free Press) and small weekly newspapers. At the age of 62, I don’t fear retribution from those who might wish to silence me for defending my American colleagues.

After a lifetime of seeking and reporting the truth as best I could—not always succeeding, at times being in error, but having won many awards for my body of work, which includes five books—I decided, inspired by the brilliant books and columns of Conrad Black, to speak up and defend traditional values, our basic freedoms, and others who embrace them.

And since my late father, Clayton Bird, fought to defeat fascism and protect our freedoms in World War II as the pilot of a Halifax bomber, I also owe him, and his peers, a great debt of gratitude.

Thriving on Diversity​


Democracy, like nature itself, thrives on diversity. Just as monoculture in agriculture is scorned as damaging to soils and crops alike, so too does a single voice in democracy lead to sterility and rot. We need a rich panoply of opinions like a meadow needs grasses, shrubs, and wildflowers, so they can help each other grow and thrive. We need progressive voices to help society evolve and improve—but we also need conservative views to protect the wisdom we’ve inherited.

Just as yin needs yang in Chinese philosophy for balance and harmony, so too does democracy need divergent views for a healthy intellectual life, for testing ideas and rejecting those that prove unfit and fallacious and embracing those that pass tests of reason and utility.

The truth emerges not from a single source—surely we learned that from Pravda’s propaganda in the Soviet Union and from the Chinese regime’s current censorship—but from a multiplicity of competing viewpoints that challenge each other, allowing the best to prevail.

You don’t have to agree with all that Carlson and Hannity say. I don’t, and they don’t expect us to. What matters is that they give many millions of people a different perspective to that in the mainstream media; they offer a conservative point of view to balance and question the progressive creed of those who now dominate our elected offices, the halls of academia, legal institutions, public schools, and the bastions of popular culture.

Attack on Free Speech​


Whatever your nationality, you will recall that the First Amendment in the U.S. Bill of Rights protects freedom of speech and freedom of the press, which covers TV news and commentary. The United States has been the world’s bulwark of free speech for 245 years since 1776.

In modern history, the only affront to freedom of speech in America similar to what we see today occurred during the post-war period of McCarthyism in the late 1940s and early 1950s when people suspected of harboring communist sympathies were removed from their jobs. William L. Shirer, an esteemed war-time radio reporter and author of the best-selling “The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich” about Hitler’s destructive rule, was among those silenced.

Today the situation is reversed. It’s progressives, some clearly sympathetic to the Antifa-Marxist fringe of the Democratic Party, who are doing the persecuting, and they do so with impunity. We saw this last summer when Antifa and related groups toppled statues, injured hundreds of police officers, burned cruisers and private businesses, and actually took control, for many weeks, of portions of inner cities such as Seattle. Yet they were allowed this rampage in direct violation of the law. The mainstream media insisted these were “peaceful protests.” Thanks to Carlson and Hannity, we got some sanity on this madness.

In his Inaugural Address, President Joe Biden correctly declared that “The American story depends not on any one of us … but on all of us.” Yes it does, and that includes all of your voices, our voices, including those of Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity. Biden is right, so don’t censor them, help them and others carry on their good and necessary work.

Brad Bird is an award-winning Canadian reporter and editorial writer with a master’s degree in Political Studies. His book “Me and My Canoe” (Pemmican Publications) relates his many wonderful experiences paddling the Mississippi River to New Orleans.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.


 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
An advertisement features Fox News personalities, including Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity, in New York City, on March 13, 2019. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
An advertisement features Fox News personalities, including Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity, in New York City, on March 13, 2019. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
VIEWPOINTS

On the Efforts to Silence Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity

Brad Bird
Brad Bird


January 23, 2021 Updated: January 23, 2021


Commentary

The American political commentators Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity of Fox News Channel are under attack, with many calling for their removal from the airwaves.

While this is perhaps a predictable extension of cancel culture’s ongoing persecution of those who uphold traditional values, the attack on these men is a particularly offensive attempt at censorship, a line in the sand.

This is because they’re among the few remaining voices in North American journalism with the courage and commitment to report views and facts that challenge the wisdom of progressive thinking. They also defended and respected President Donald J. Trump, who was endlessly and unjustly attacked and maligned by most in the media who betrayed the tradition of fair and balanced reporting.

Carlson and Hannity have been accused, among other things, of spreading “harmful propaganda and downright fiction,” according to one source.

This is rich, considering what the mainstream media has been doing in recent years. We need to understand this clearly: Carlson and Hannity make no pretense of being objective newscasters like the late Walter Cronkite or the current Lester Holt. They’re commentators who present their opinions in the same way the acclaimed William F. Buckley once did.

The problem is that people who want just the facts can’t get them anymore in the legacy media, such as the New York Times, because it’s so tainted by wokeness, political correctness, and the anti-Trump parade. So they turn to Carlson, Hannity, and others such as Laura Ingraham for relief and common sense.

I don’t know Carlson or Hannity personally, and I’m not in the pay of either of them. I have never spoken or communicated in any way with either of them. I’m an independent Canadian writer, a semi-retired reporter/editor with more than 40 years of experience, including work in war zones and positions in Canada at both large daily (Winnipeg Free Press) and small weekly newspapers. At the age of 62, I don’t fear retribution from those who might wish to silence me for defending my American colleagues.

After a lifetime of seeking and reporting the truth as best I could—not always succeeding, at times being in error, but having won many awards for my body of work, which includes five books—I decided, inspired by the brilliant books and columns of Conrad Black, to speak up and defend traditional values, our basic freedoms, and others who embrace them.

And since my late father, Clayton Bird, fought to defeat fascism and protect our freedoms in World War II as the pilot of a Halifax bomber, I also owe him, and his peers, a great debt of gratitude.

Thriving on Diversity​


Democracy, like nature itself, thrives on diversity. Just as monoculture in agriculture is scorned as damaging to soils and crops alike, so too does a single voice in democracy lead to sterility and rot. We need a rich panoply of opinions like a meadow needs grasses, shrubs, and wildflowers, so they can help each other grow and thrive. We need progressive voices to help society evolve and improve—but we also need conservative views to protect the wisdom we’ve inherited.

Just as yin needs yang in Chinese philosophy for balance and harmony, so too does democracy need divergent views for a healthy intellectual life, for testing ideas and rejecting those that prove unfit and fallacious and embracing those that pass tests of reason and utility.

The truth emerges not from a single source—surely we learned that from Pravda’s propaganda in the Soviet Union and from the Chinese regime’s current censorship—but from a multiplicity of competing viewpoints that challenge each other, allowing the best to prevail.

You don’t have to agree with all that Carlson and Hannity say. I don’t, and they don’t expect us to. What matters is that they give many millions of people a different perspective to that in the mainstream media; they offer a conservative point of view to balance and question the progressive creed of those who now dominate our elected offices, the halls of academia, legal institutions, public schools, and the bastions of popular culture.

Attack on Free Speech​


Whatever your nationality, you will recall that the First Amendment in the U.S. Bill of Rights protects freedom of speech and freedom of the press, which covers TV news and commentary. The United States has been the world’s bulwark of free speech for 245 years since 1776.

In modern history, the only affront to freedom of speech in America similar to what we see today occurred during the post-war period of McCarthyism in the late 1940s and early 1950s when people suspected of harboring communist sympathies were removed from their jobs. William L. Shirer, an esteemed war-time radio reporter and author of the best-selling “The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich” about Hitler’s destructive rule, was among those silenced.

Today the situation is reversed. It’s progressives, some clearly sympathetic to the Antifa-Marxist fringe of the Democratic Party, who are doing the persecuting, and they do so with impunity. We saw this last summer when Antifa and related groups toppled statues, injured hundreds of police officers, burned cruisers and private businesses, and actually took control, for many weeks, of portions of inner cities such as Seattle. Yet they were allowed this rampage in direct violation of the law. The mainstream media insisted these were “peaceful protests.” Thanks to Carlson and Hannity, we got some sanity on this madness.

In his Inaugural Address, President Joe Biden correctly declared that “The American story depends not on any one of us … but on all of us.” Yes it does, and that includes all of your voices, our voices, including those of Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity. Biden is right, so don’t censor them, help them and others carry on their good and necessary work.

Brad Bird is an award-winning Canadian reporter and editorial writer with a master’s degree in Political Studies. His book “Me and My Canoe” (Pemmican Publications) relates his many wonderful experiences paddling the Mississippi River to New Orleans.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.



According to FOX lawyers, they are entertainers, not news personalities
As to their personality- ripping the rubes for 10's of millions- Sean is a burgeoning slum lord.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
You obviously don’t like them . Many do . If you aren’t interesting don’t watch , it is a simple concept . I don’t watch them .
I was commenting on the OP- ref news - they are not
Agreed they are slime & IMHO many incited the violence on Capitol Hill, 6 Jan

OP makes reference to 1 A- no 1A violations-

And they are both slime balls
 
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: B00Mer and Cliffy

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,636
6,979
113
B.C.
I was commenting on the OP- ref news - they are not
Agreed they are slime & IMHO many incited the violence on Capitol Hill, 6 Jan

OP makes reference to 1 A- no 1A violations-

And they are both slime balls
Lots of slime balls , check out the opinion writers for the New York Times and the Washington Post . Same shit different pile . I don’t read them either .
 
  • Like
Reactions: taxslave

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
I was commenting on the OP- ref news - they are not
Agreed they are slime & IMHO many incited the violence on Capitol Hill, 6 Jan

OP makes reference to 1 A- no 1A violations-

And they are both slime balls
LOL you are more full of crap than they are!

haha Geez dood, seriously fecesbook is just now deleting the effe tards that incited the violence on Jan 6. The were Auntifags

For militia organizations and those “encouraging riots,” including some that may identify as Antifa, Facebook said it initially removed over 980 groups, 520 Pages and 160 ads from Facebook and also restricted over 1,400 hashtags on Instagram related to those groups and organizations.

Q anon was NEVER for trump they were there to trick trump supporters who followed the blm and auntifag tards into the capitol.

INSIDER SAYS 226 ANTIFA MEMBERS STARTED CAPITOL HILL RIOTS ON JAN. 6​




More Proof of BLM/Antifa Capitol Riot Involvement Emerges [UPDATED]​

It was a classic false flag operation. – In case you still labor under the illusion that BLM/Antifa agitators did not help cause the Capitol riot on January 6, the federal government disagrees. Radical BLM/Antifa professional agitator John E. Sullivan was arrested yesterday for his role in the rioting:


But this all old ground now, just because YOU haven't got a clue, doesn't change any facts at all. So you can suck yer sneers right back up yer butt.
;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: taxslave

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
LOL you are more full of crap than they are!

haha Geez dood, seriously fecesbook is just now deleting the effe tards that incited the violence on Jan 6. The were Auntifags

For militia organizations and those “encouraging riots,” including some that may identify as Antifa, Facebook said it initially removed over 980 groups, 520 Pages and 160 ads from Facebook and also restricted over 1,400 hashtags on Instagram related to those groups and organizations.

Q anon was NEVER for trump they were there to trick trump supporters who followed the blm and auntifag tards into the capitol.

INSIDER SAYS 226 ANTIFA MEMBERS STARTED CAPITOL HILL RIOTS ON JAN. 6​




More Proof of BLM/Antifa Capitol Riot Involvement Emerges [UPDATED]​

It was a classic false flag operation. – In case you still labor under the illusion that BLM/Antifa agitators did not help cause the Capitol riot on January 6, the federal government disagrees. Radical BLM/Antifa professional agitator John E. Sullivan was arrested yesterday for his role in the rioting:


But this all old ground now, just because YOU haven't got a clue, doesn't change any facts at all. So you can suck yer sneers right back up yer butt.
;)
Yep all those that caused violence were all Antifa - hiding out in deep Trump country- that is really Deep State
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Cliffy

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Go easy on the delusion berries dood, I know you don't do facts, but that is still no excuse.

WE all know you don't know the meaning of the word "PEACEFUL"


FIRE & FURY

Antifa burn American flags at Colorado Capitol as protests erupt on Biden’s Inauguration Day​


Commie freaks have already killed well over 150 million of their own people in the last few BANKER RUN COLOR REVOLUTIONS, why stop now, right?

LOL, Bullsheviks.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Just pull a roll out of your butt cliffy...scrape the teeth off the far end of it and hand it over!
;)
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
..And while you are at it Cliffy, give MF a head wrap too.
:)
That tape will be wet and you will need to hang it for a while to dry it out and also so you can find the molars that are stuck to the far end of the roll.
 

Serryah

Executive Branch Member
Dec 3, 2008
8,973
2,071
113
New Brunswick
Yep all those that caused violence were all Antifa - hiding out in deep Trump country- that is really Deep State

I love how this keeps being the theory, and yet people there either are listed die hard Trump supporters, or they refute the whole ANTIFA thing and say loud and proud they were Trumpers.

Cause you know, the right can never admit they did something wrong, but demand the left admit they've done evil even when it hasn't.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,567
7,076
113
Washington DC
Ah. "Many" are calling for their removal.

Yep, Trumpism is now the go-to tactic for lazy right-wingers. "Many people are saying. . ." "Most people don't know. . ."

I'm pretty sure the rich guy, I'll call him Rich, will stop Mr Bird in the hallway and tell him what a great job he's doing.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,636
6,979
113
B.C.
:k
I love how this keeps being the theory, and yet people there either are listed die hard Trump supporters, or they refute the whole ANTIFA thing and say loud and proud they were Trumpers.

Cause you know, the right can never admit they did something wrong, but demand the left admit they've done evil even when it hasn't.
Yet you refuse to even look at the evidence presented .Please answer this simple question , if Antifa have been at every riot and protest for the last ten years , why would they give this one a pass ? And why are they still setting buildings on fire in Portland if their side won ?