True, but a flood of that magnitude that recently would have left signs on the landscape and geologists and archeologists would have found them. They're not there. Besides, now you would have us believe that the disbelievers were confined to "the region of Nineveh in the north of Iraq near Mosul" if that's the only place the flood happened. That's roughly the zone between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, ancient Mesopotamia. Because of the topography of the area a major flood there, enough water to leave only a mountain top sticking up for the Ark to land on, which the Quran identifies as Al Judi and is generally thought to be a spot near the Turkish-Iranian border not far from Mt. Ararat where the Bible claims the Ark ended up, would spread far to the west and south, and there's no sign of it there either. The story's a fable. There are multiple flood myths from that area, and there are certainly signs that both the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers have flooded locally, but certainly not to the extent that either the Quran's or the Bible's version of the Noah's Ark story can be taken as true.No ocean was in that region.
The story was lifted from The Epic of Gilgamesh. Like pretty much everything else in Genesis.True, but a flood of that magnitude that recently would have left signs on the landscape and geologists and archeologists would have found them. They're not there. Besides, now you would have us believe that the disbelievers were confined to "the region of Nineveh in the north of Iraq near Mosul" if that's the only place the flood happened. That's roughly the zone between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, ancient Mesopotamia. Because of the topography of the area a major flood there, enough water to leave only a mountain top sticking up for the Ark to land on, which the Quran identifies as Al Judi and is generally thought to be a spot near the Turkish-Iranian border not far from Mt. Ararat where the Bible claims the Ark ended up, would spread far to the west and south, and there's no sign of it there either. The story's a fable. There are multiple flood myths from that area, and there are certainly signs that both the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers have flooded locally, but certainly not to the extent that either the Quran's or the Bible's version of the Noah's Ark story can be taken as true.
Right, in other words you're a mindless automaton that does what he's told by a book. Loser.I as a servant: I ask but do not object. This is the difference between me and you: blasphemers:
You mean that stuff inside of men's balls? Yeah, the whole word knows how that works, except you apparently.you - being so weak and miserable and dirty: carrying your dirt in your bowel and bladder - you object and do not recall your creation from a scanty seminal fluid.
Huh, and here I thought he made man from the dust of the Earth. Maybe you guys and the Christians and Jews can get together and get your bullshit straight.Quran 16: 4, which means:
(He created the human being from a scanty [seminal] fluid f, yet he becomes a manifest g opponent.)
Blah blah blah. You see your problem here is, in order for me to give a shit, I'd actually have to believe the horseshit your garbage quran spews. The quran does make for good fire starting material though...................................................................................................................................................................................
f Then as He perfected his creation, prepared for him the milk in the breast of his mother, took care of him, provided provision for him, made his parents kind to him, until he grew, and became older, then when he became a strong man, he started to oppose Our messengers.
g i.e. his enmity and opposition are evidently obvious.
Where do you carry your "dirt?" In your pocket? In your left hand?This is the difference between me and you: blasphemers:
you - being so weak and miserable and dirty: carrying your dirt in your bowel and bladder
Or at least slaughter each other in the name of a merciful god of love.Maybe you guys and the Christians and Jews can get together and get your bullshit straight.
The mountain Al Judi mentioned in the Quran is one of the mountains of the Ararat range in Turkey.. no contradiction between the Torah and the Quran here.True, but a flood of that magnitude that recently would have left signs on the landscape and geologists and archeologists would have found them. They're not there. Besides, now you would have us believe that the disbelievers were confined to "the region of Nineveh in the north of Iraq near Mosul" if that's the only place the flood happened. That's roughly the zone between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, ancient Mesopotamia. Because of the topography of the area a major flood there, enough water to leave only a mountain top sticking up for the Ark to land on, which the Quran identifies as Al Judi and is generally thought to be a spot near the Turkish-Iranian border not far from Mt. Ararat where the Bible claims the Ark ended up, would spread far to the west and south, and there's no sign of it there either. The story's a fable. There are multiple flood myths from that area, and there are certainly signs that both the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers have flooded locally, but certainly not to the extent that either the Quran's or the Bible's version of the Noah's Ark story can be taken as true.
None? I can, and do. There are perfectly satisfactory natural explanations for those, no need to invoke the supernatural. If you know nothing of science and read only the Bible or the Quran, or both, and are asked to describe the physical universe based on what you read there, you'll get it wrong, as you often demonstrate.None can deny God's miracles and wonders going on till now: like floods, hurricanes, earthquakes, etc.
Materialistic enough to have a computer and internet connection.You are materialistic; I am not.
Even allowing for the fact that English isn't your first language, I can't make any sense of that. I can indeed deny in this way, I've been doing it consistently all through this thread, and many of your other threads, and I can certainly affirm that I doubt. The key to clear and critical thinking is that doubt is the default position when presented with a claim, until the evidence and arguments are presented in support of it. If they're adequate to establish its truth, it'll be accepted, but you also need to recognize that all claims but the trivial are provisional to some degree, pending receipt of further evidence. You've produced no evidence for any of your claims, merely assertions from the authority of various texts, mostly the Quran and Al-Hilly's interpretation of it, so I continue to doubt most of what you claim. That's the method of scientific thinking that you've accused me of not following, while trying to claim that your belief "in the Unknown or the Unseen" is the better approach. It eludes me how, if it's unknown and unseen, you can find any basis for believing any of it.Anyhow, you cannot deny in this way.. you may say: I doubt, but cannot affirm that
What proofs?...believers believe in God and give their proofs...
I said before, might be more than once that the Quran differs from the other available heavenly books included in the Bible.. the Quran differs in that it includes arguments and evidence; i.e. God gives the evidence by telling the Prophet: say to them so and so .. that is in reply to the objections of disbelievers: the idolaters and the atheists.Even allowing for the fact that English isn't your first language, I can't make any sense of that. I can indeed deny in this way, I've been doing it consistently all through this thread, and many of your other threads, and I can certainly affirm that I doubt. The key to clear and critical thinking is that doubt is the default position when presented with a claim, until the evidence and arguments are presented in support of it. If they're adequate to establish its truth, it'll be accepted, but you also need to recognize that all claims but the trivial are provisional to some degree, pending receipt of further evidence. You've produced no evidence for any of your claims, merely assertions from the authority of various texts, mostly the Quran and Al-Hilly's interpretation of it, so I continue to doubt most of what you claim. That's the method of scientific thinking that you've accused me of not following, while trying to claim that your belief "in the Unknown or the Unseen" is the better approach. It eludes me how, if it's unknown and unseen, you can find any basis for believing any of it.
If faith and revelation are valid ways to acquire reliable knowledge, they should produce consistent results and conclusions. That they don't, as attested by the great variety of religious beliefs and experiences people report having, means they don't work that way. Jews for instance believe the Messiah is yet to arrive, Christians believe he's been and gone and will return, sooner or later depending on which sect of Christianity is involved, and you, depending on which sect of Islam you belong to, might be awaiting the appearance of the 12th Imam as a harbinger of the end times. Obviously at least two of those conclusions must be wrong, but it's faith and revelation that's produced them all, and the most rational approach, considering the lack of evidence for any of them, is to conclude all three are wrong. Which I've done.
"True facts" being the unsupported word of a seventh-century barbarian.Examples of the arguments of the Quran:
The atheists who deny God and the Hereafter:
Quran 45: 24, which means:
They a say: "There is nothing but our [present] Worldly life; we die and [our children] live b, and nothing but Time [factors] destroy us. c "
[So God – be glorified – said:]
Of that they have no knowledge e, they merely conjecture f.
.................................................................................................................................................................................
24 a i.e. the deniers of the sending to the Hereafter, and of the Judgment.
24 b It means: Our children will be instead of us, and there isn’t after this life any other life, such as you threaten us with, neither is there any angel to seize our spirits, as you say.
24 c It means: the means of death are not else than only disease, murder, drowning, burn, or aging.
24 e Because they are in a material world, and they do not know anything about the ether world: the world of souls, and they do not believe in it until they go to it following their death.
24 f They depend on guessing, not on true facts.
http://quran-ayat.com/pret/45.htm#a45_24