Nycole Turmel’s flirtation with sovereignty was not a secret.

[DaSleeper]

No you aren't getting to me at all. If you contributed something worth discussing then perhaps you could piss me off but you're just a ****ing useless lurker who does nothing. Are you brain dead that you can't contribute or you just lurk?

Come on Mr Right Winger Lurker I have something for you to do. Find a Liberal policy on international trade that Cons have reversed to regain our sovereignty That is what the thread is about right? Sovereignty?

Do you approve of "Global "Governance" and the loss of sovereignty yes or no? Spill your guts. lets here some real opinions that aren't right/left b h u l l s h i t.

What have you personally done to ensure Canada's sovereignty as a lurking troll?

You sound stupid when you're angry....but do keep going...this is fun to watch.

 

[petros]

Well lets hear it. What have the Cons done to reverse Liberal trade policies that have usurped Canadian sovereignty? What have you done about it? Lurked in your MPs office?

"I know some people don't like it, it's a loss of National Sovereignty but it is a simple reality".

Stephen Harper - G20 Toronto 2010

Well? What have you done besides lurk while you country was being ****ed over?

 

[mentalfloss]

Well lets hear it. What have the Cons done to reverse Liberal trade policies that have usurped Canadian sovereignty? What have you done about it? Lurked in your MPs office?

:lol:

We should probably stick to Turmel and Quebec sovereignty.

 

[petros]

Perhaps you're right. National sovereignty seems to baffle the bags of hammers when dissolution of Canadian sovereignty is coming right from the top chair in Ottawa.

Perhaps "what have the Cons done to reverse Liberal trade policy that have usurped Canadian sovereignty" is too complex a question?

 

[DaSleeper]

:lol:

We should probably stick to Turmel and Quebec sovereignty.

You lefties make me laugh with your sanctimonious defending of someone who doesn't need defending...:smile:

You all seem to take it as a personal attack when polititians of all stripes have changed sides and "walked across the aisle". Even Winston Churchill wasn't in the same party all his life and many more here in Canada have done the same thing...but do keep on arguing a non-issue and have a snickers bar

‪SNICKERS® - YOU'RE NOT YOU WHEN YOU'RE HUNGRY®‬‏ - YouTube

 

[petros]

I voted for Cons. How does that make me a leftie, Mr lurker?

Well? What have you done besides lurk while your country was being ****ed over? Search youtube for videos because you can't piece together a ****ing sentence?

 

[DaSleeper]

I voted for Cons.

Of course you did....I believe every thing you say....

 

[petros]

LMFAO...come on lurker. Now you don't like who I voted for even though it's right wing?


What the **** have you done to stop the dissolution of Canadian national sovereignty coming from the top seat in Ottawa?

Do you think he was lying when he said what he said and did what he did?

 

[DaSleeper]

You don't like who I voted for? Who should I have voted for then?

Whatsamatter...you don't like it when I disagree? and you don't like it when I agree? make up your mind...

 

[petros]

What have you done to stop Harper/Martin/Chretien's sovereignty killing international policy?

Nothing? Something? Anything?

Lurked?

 

[DaSleeper]

What have you done to stop Harper/Martin/Chretien's sovereignty killing international policy?

Nothing? Something? Anything?

Lurked?

What have you done except postalotofnonsense???

 

[petros]

So you've done nothing? Is that what you are saying?

"I know some people don't like it, it's a loss of National Sovereignty but it is a simple reality".

Did a leftie speak those words? Yes or no?

 

[DaSleeper]

Again What have you done except postalotofnonsense???

and your sidekick giving you encouragement with the thumbs up....you do know you're beeing used dontcha?
I am starting to get borred with your nonsense....like the little chiuawa that keeps nipping at your heels.... so shoo:lol:

 

[petros]

So you've done nothing? Is that what you are saying?

"I know some people don't like it, it's a loss of National Sovereignty but it is a simple reality".

Did a leftie speak those words? Yes or no?

Who said those words? A leftie or a rightie? What have you done about it?

 

[DaSleeper]

Who said those words? A leftie or a rightie? What have you done about it?

Yaaawwn!!!! shooo!

There you go..Have the last word...you tempestuous child:lol:

 

[petros]

Yup go back to sleep and biting the pillow as you take it up the ass.

"I know some people don't like it, it's a loss of National Sovereignty but it is a simple reality".

 

[Tonington]

My mistake...it just got borring faster than I thought..................

Yup. It normally does when the content get's distilled to a boring right-left dichotomy.

I thought it was interesting to see how the thread title claimed flirtation, and then the thread morphed into Turmel's full support of the separatists.

But now we're back to boring right-left drudge, like so many threads devolve into.

 

[mentalfloss]

Yup. It normally does when the content get's distilled to a boring right-left dichotomy.

I thought it was interesting to see how the thread title claimed flirtation, and then the thread morphed into Turmel's full support of the separatists.

Yes.. about that.. some posters need the serious edumacation..


Turmel in the BQ? Big deal

What’s my position? I agree that holding membership in a separatist party is highly questionable, and usually not the wisest route to political success. But I’ve heard much, much worse in my day.

Turmel’s explanation that she was simply supporting a friend makes perfect sense. Many people purchase party cards to support family members, friends and even business associates. Some let them lapse after a year, and others renew them on an annual basis. Jumping from political lily pad to lily pad is more common these days, and familial and sociological loyalty to political parties is a thing of the past.

At the same time, the amount of money Turmel gave to the BQ in four years was next to nothing. She apparently didn’t even hold a role in a riding association. At best, she sounds like a fair-weather party supporter. Like it or not, this is hardly a great cause for concern. Yet she has had to face multiple accusations of supporting the separatist cause.

Many Quebecers have freely shifted their votes from the BQ to NDP because of the two parties’ similar social democratic values and like-minded policy proposals. Not too long ago, the BQ was the only viable alternative for Quebec leftists who couldn’t bring themselves to vote Liberal. In one well-known example, Turmel’s union supported some BQ candidates in the 2006 federal election. This was clearly a vote for socialist — rather than separatist — ideology.

Turmel in the BQ? Big deal
​

 

[Nuggler]

Well, it do appear ol' Jack has took careful aim at his foot, and pulled the trigger.

Did he know. Or not. Did he care. Or not.???

Whatever, he certainly has given the Cons grist for their mills, both now, and come the next erection. Can hardly wait to see what's coming down the road.

I still don't think it's as bad as ol'Stevo spending a bill. on the G20, (for eg.), but that's just me.

 

[Colpy]

Best thing written on Turmel yet...

There is no mistaking the QS’s position on Quebec separation. No one who buys a membership can claim to be a soft nationalist or a nationalist-of-convenience. No member is someone who unwittingly got caught up in a radical organization because either a) she merely wanted to advance a friend’s political ambitions or b) she didn’t understand fully the nature of the organization she was joining.

Lorne Gunter: Turmel

As of TUESDAY, she was still a member of QS.

A separatist, commie sleeper in the ranks of the NDP??? Now LEADER???

lol

I love it!

This is excellent as well.....the NDP need to develop a coherent Quebec policy.....and a hide.....

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/08/05/jeff-jedras-turmel-reaction-exposes-ndps-thin-skin/