Mueller report is in..

Ocean Breeze

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48

Mueller report's release expected Thursday, Justice Dept. says

Attorney General William P. Barr told lawmakers last month that he needed time to redact sensitive information from the document before it could be made public. Spanning nearly 400 pages, the document details the findings of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III's 22-month investigation of President Trump's conduct, that of his advisers and Russia's interference in the 2016 election.

source: WAPO

guess we will see. ...just how redacted it will be.
 
Danbones

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
LOL...
;)
there are some indictments coming...but they won't be for Trump.
 
Dixie Cup

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,341
4,039
113
Edmonton
What is soooo funny is that when Barr was appointed, his appointment was "bi-partisan" and the Dems extolled his integrity and honesty and were happy with his appointment. Now that he said that as far as he could see there was no collusion but that he thinks there was spying on the Trump Adm. during the election, the Dems are mortified and are now spewing hate, saying that he's "protecting" Trump etc., etc. If I was Barr, I would sue big time because they are literally slandering his reputation. It's unbelievable.


So if anyone is going to be indicted the Clintons and their "friends" should be at the top of the list.
 
H

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
Barr got zero democratic votes.
nada one.

What is so funny is the natties needing to create their own fantasy world.
 
Kreskin

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Dixie Cup said:
What is soooo funny is that when Barr was appointed, his appointment was "bi-partisan" and the Dems extolled his integrity and honesty and were happy with his appointment. Now that he said that as far as he could see there was no collusion but that he thinks there was spying on the Trump Adm. during the election, the Dems are mortified and are now spewing hate, saying that he's "protecting" Trump etc., etc. If I was Barr, I would sue big time because they are literally slandering his reputation. It's unbelievable.


So if anyone is going to be indicted the Clintons and their "friends" should be at the top of the list.
Click to expand...
Even if there was, there should've been. Trump was on the trail fawning over WikiLeaks and asking for Russia to present stolen material.
 
EagleSmack

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Dixie Cup said:
What is soooo funny is that when Barr was appointed, his appointment was "bi-partisan" and the Dems extolled his integrity and honesty and were happy with his appointment. Now that he said that as far as he could see there was no collusion but that he thinks there was spying on the Trump Adm. during the election, the Dems are mortified and are now spewing hate, saying that he's "protecting" Trump etc., etc. If I was Barr, I would sue big time because they are literally slandering his reputation. It's unbelievable.


So if anyone is going to be indicted the Clintons and their "friends" should be at the top of the list.
Click to expand...


The Dems and Alt-Left Media are trying to get out in front of the indictments that they are about to be showered with. The Russian Collusion Hoax started somewhere. It is time for the DOJ to start digging deep.
 
H

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
All things are traced back to Obama.
And that's perfectly normal.

 
Kreskin

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Twin_Moose said:
Looking like it could land right back onto the lap of Obama
Click to expand...
In law, trial lawyers are careful about who they question and about what because it opens up the lawful means for the other side to cross examine the entire issue. I'm sure the Dems would love the chance to get everything and everyone cross examined in public. If Barr is going this route he could open a can if worms. That's a funny strategy for a guy holding a report that apparently already exonerates his boss.
 
C

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Kreskin said:
In law, trial lawyers are careful about who they question and about what because it opens up the lawful means for the other side to cross examine the entire issue. I'm sure the Dems would love the chance to get everything and everyone cross examined in public. If Barr is going this route he could open a can if worms. That's a funny strategy for a guy holding a report that apparently already exonerates his boss.
Click to expand...
Expect the redacted part to be a lot bigger than the un-editted portions. We are not talking about honest people, here.
 
pgs

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,579
8,164
113
B.C.
Kreskin said:
In law, trial lawyers are careful about who they question and about what because it opens up the lawful means for the other side to cross examine the entire issue. I'm sure the Dems would love the chance to get everything and everyone cross examined in public. If Barr is going this route he could open a can if worms. That's a funny strategy for a guy holding a report that apparently already exonerates his boss.
Click to expand...
Did you really expect the President of the United States to be led out of the White House in chains ?
 
H

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
Kreskin said:
In law, trial lawyers are careful about who they question and about what because it opens up the lawful means for the other side to cross examine the entire issue. I'm sure the Dems would love the chance to get everything and everyone cross examined in public. If Barr is going this route he could open a can if worms. That's a funny strategy for a guy holding a report that apparently already exonerates his boss.
Click to expand...
as has already been pointed out - if this report exonerated Trump he would be publishing on every social media platform on earth
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom