:roll: So it'd be ok to kill abortionists.
I doubt if S.J. would approve.
:roll: So it'd be ok to kill abortionists.
Not surprised. I don't approve of the idea either. I think using violence to combat violence is just antediluvian to the point of being Jurassic.I doubt if S.J. would approve.
Not surprised. I don't approve of the idea either. I think using violence to combat violence is just antediluvian to the point of being Jurassic.
:roll: So it'd be ok to kill abortionists.
Not surprised. I don't approve of the idea either. I think using violence to combat violence is just antediluvian to the point of being Jurassic.
Not to mention being downright rude.
After I said what I said, you say this? hmmm Ever consider getting help with that problem you have?I'm not the one advocating the death penalty. All I'm saying is that if you want it, and it's brought back, then you should be prepared to live by the same code. You want to kill someone for something they did or helped to do, then be prepared to forfeight your own life if the system that you helped bring about kills someone that didn't deserve it.
What's so hard to understand with that? Oh...I know..... it's ok to allow someone else to be killed, as long as it's not your neck on the line.
YesAccused in Tori Stafford case, woman's charges upgraded to first-degree murder Updated: 19 minutes ago
Charges against an 18-year-old woman accused in the Tori Stafford case have been upgraded to first-degree murder.
Makes a person wonder just what the police know or don't know. But I sincerely wish they would find that little girl. So her family can find some closure.
The thing that worries me most is that without a body, can they be sentenced for murder, or will they get away with it now?
In such cases, prosecutors must build a circumstantial case using evidence acquired by crime-scene investigators, statements from witnesses and details about the behavior and actions of the suspect in the crime.
The key to a conviction is that the evidence presented at trial must be sufficient to convince a jury that a homicide is the only reasonable explanation of what took place.
However, if prosecutors lose in court and a body or other evidence is later discovered, the defendant cannot be retried.
Now they are saying they may never find the remains of poor Tori.
Police may never find Tori's remains - The Globe and Mail
I have to say, my blood is boiling even more now.
Quite frankly, they need to do whatever it takes to find her remains. My heart breaks for the family, who will never have closure on this. Whether it's tack a year to the sentence for each day that the body is missing until they find her, or more drastic methods.
I know if it was my daughter, I would want her back, so I could give her a proper burial.
The thing that worries me most is that without a body, can they be sentenced for murder, or will they get away with it now?
I'm just glad the parents will get some closure from the loss of their child.
Personally, I'm glad those two are finally going to be put away and I hope we don't go to extraordinary measures to keep them safe from the general prison population.
it too bad the police ****ed up the search warrant.:roll:
That's only in regards to the contents of his laptop drive, there is still plenty of evidence to send him away for the rest of his rotten life.
Hang him by his toes!