Like you do with your posts, meant only to demonize Israel.
So you are a troll.
That's a long read.
I bookmarked it and will go over it. But the main page, reads like stuff Mhz posts.
Lieutenant-General Roméo Antonius Dallaire
- Thread starter earth_as_one
- Start date
So you are a troll.
I bookmarked it and will go over it. But the main page, reads like stuff Mhz posts.
All these posts on this thread that have nothing to do with Dallaire are technically trolling. I should have ignored them.
What do you consider your posts, where you misrepresent what people actually said?
I quoted exactly what they said in context. Then expressed my opinion based on what I believed to be their point. Why bring up Dallaire as an example in a thread about a crazed gun man who slaughtered innocent women and children if it wasn't to draw parallels?
Like I siad, misrepresent what they said.
It's awesome to see you admit to it for a change.
Good for you.
All one has to do, is read ES' question, to understand exactly what he was trying to convey.
I understood exactly what he was doing. I even said so in that thread.
Was any of it written by Carrol Off - CBC type - She wrote tons on Lew MacKenzie - accused him of a number of foul acts - had dates, times, who he met, where he met them in the FRY - Oddly enough Lew rebutted - he was not even in the Country on the dates she mentioned.
Yet never a word on CBC that the book was full of inaccuracies - No Sir - protect their own.
You set this OP up to Troll. Pretty scummy - But it fits you like a second skin.
Christopher Black, a writer for "Global Research", lol.
I knew the article Gh posted smacked of nuttery, and sounded like something Mhz would post.
But I'll go through it anyways.
It is where OB gets her wacko thoughts. I subscribed just so i can get a leg up on what she will post next. Boy Scout ya know.
GlobalResearch.ca - Centre for Research on Globalization
No you didn't. You said I compared the soldier who murdered 16 Afghans to Dallaire. I said nothing of the sort. I explained myself.
Now you're pizzed that people aren't flocking to your side.
You lie again.
Oh heck yes I would... and I bet the Belgians would have done pretty darn well. But I'd NEVER send only 10 soldiers! That's not even a full squad! WTF!
BUT... if I had made the dumb azz mistake of sending 10... I surely would have sent more to get them out of dodge. I bet these 10 soldiers would have been able to hold out long enough. Eight of them held out for two hours with a pistol and an AK-47.
And yes... I'd violate UN orders in a heartbeat.
Is that why you had the wrong posters names in context - Is that why that poster had to correct you. Shxt man we are so tired of correcting you.
Do you not ever learn.
No is the correct reply.
Time to apologize to the people you slammed is the proper thing to do.
Then request to have the Thread closed
Then put up a proper OP with Links and showing the various things that happened in this Genocide.
Include the French for starters, the UN Chain of Command with names - Those I gave you.
The countries that refused to do anything.
A proper OP. Is that beyond you?
say what? Where the hell was Israel mentioned in this entire thread... besides your reference.
ES re Dallaire
Do you know the reason why he sent Belgians instead of his own?
and
Hey he kept his boys safe! Can you imagine if the Yanks sent the Canucks to be slaughtered and completely without support?....
Saying that about Dallaire pushes a button for me. Congrats ES.
My OP in this thread:
Later I wrote:
I understood your meaning that Dallaire is a murderer. He deliberately sent Belgians to their death. But upon rereading it, you never did answer your own question:
Do you know the reason why he sent Belgians instead of his own?
Instead you said this:
ES: "On the first night of the war, Rwandan government forces were murdering Tutsi and Hutu moderate politicians. Dallaire dispatched one unit of 10 Belgian peacekeepers to secure the home of Rwanda's prime minister. The Belgians were by far the most experienced of his soldiers. But they were ambushed, taken prisoner and later tortured, mutilated and murdered." Many are alive due to his (Dallaire's) actions? Are you serious? 800,000 were killed!
No ES please tell us... Why did Dallaire sent Belgians instead of his own?
Do you know the reason why he sent Belgians instead of his own?
and
Hey he kept his boys safe! Can you imagine if the Yanks sent the Canucks to be slaughtered and completely without support?....
Saying that about Dallaire pushes a button for me. Congrats ES.
My OP in this thread:
Later I wrote:
earth_as_one said:
I understood your meaning that Dallaire is a murderer. He deliberately sent Belgians to their death. But upon rereading it, you never did answer your own question:
Do you know the reason why he sent Belgians instead of his own?
Instead you said this:
ES: "On the first night of the war, Rwandan government forces were murdering Tutsi and Hutu moderate politicians. Dallaire dispatched one unit of 10 Belgian peacekeepers to secure the home of Rwanda's prime minister. The Belgians were by far the most experienced of his soldiers. But they were ambushed, taken prisoner and later tortured, mutilated and murdered." Many are alive due to his (Dallaire's) actions? Are you serious? 800,000 were killed!
No ES please tell us... Why did Dallaire sent Belgians instead of his own?
Fix the OP - Are you that dumb
Noted that you like EAO run away from hard questions, Mr. Pacifist - Yet you threaten violence upon posters. What type of Bullshxt Pacifist are you. The questions are on the other thread. Care to man up. Or will I get you typical numbnuts reply.
That is your style is it not.
So if I understand your point, you think Dallaire f'd up rather than was overwhelmed and faced an impossible situation..
... and you agree?
Dellaire was the commander.... he was responsible... period.
The same as mckenzie was responsible for somalia and the airborne.