Liberals now pulling away from Cons into majority territory

Corduroy

Senate Member
Feb 9, 2011
6,670
2
36
Vancouver, BC
Now, I live under a Congressional system, not a Parliamentary system, but I'm still pretty sure 50% +1 is a majority, and two or more parties cobbled together to get 50 + 1 is called a coalition.

That's seats. Those numbers are for popular vote, which doesn't actually count. Not in your system or ours.
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Conservatives formed a majority with 41% I think.

no - @39.6%

 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Now, I live under a Congressional system, not a Parliamentary system, but I'm still pretty sure 50% +1 is a majority, and two or more parties cobbled together to get 50 + 1 is called a coalition.

As Corduroy mentioned that is for seats.

Each riding victory counts as 1 seat for the winning party.

The low percentage is reflective of a lot of close battles in each riding. Even if the winner gets that riding by one vote - too bad so sad for a substantial proportion of people who voted for the other guy (or girl).

This leads to a body of governmental power that could be extremely disparate from what a truly democratic vote would represent if it were proportional.
 

Corduroy

Senate Member
Feb 9, 2011
6,670
2
36
Vancouver, BC
Wyoming doesn't exist. It's just the sarlac pit Dick Cheney emerged from it. It's gets two senators like every other state, but if you actually counted it proportionally, you'd only get one vote for Satan.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
71
Saint John, N.B.
Dec 16th aggregate update:


Hmmm...not quite as good today.

Conservatives formed a majority with 41% I think.

It's all about how thinly the winning vote spreads across each riding.

This makes the case for proportional representation, which would have a government in power that more accurately reflects the voters. PR would also prevent strategic voting, which is something the Ontario PCs suffered in the last election because everyone who was not Hudak went '**** that douchebag' and voted for Wynne even if she wasn't their first choice.


39.6% actually.

Now, with these new facts, let's review...........



Things looked pretty good for your boy back in July........

In five months the Liberals have lost 2.7 percentage points.

In five months the Conservatives have gained 3.9 percentage points.

Ten months to go.

hmmmmmmm.


Liberals now pulling away from Cons into majority territory??



WRONG.
 
Last edited:

Corduroy

Senate Member
Feb 9, 2011
6,670
2
36
Vancouver, BC
Oh yeah, when the right was divided in 90s there weren't any conservatives that supported proportional representation. No sir, not a one. And certainly there weren't any conservatives that supported proportional representation who then went on to be Prime Minister. Nope, that never happened.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
71
Saint John, N.B.
Oh yeah, when the right was divided in 90s there weren't any conservatives that supported proportional representation. No sir, not a one. And certainly there weren't any conservatives that supported proportional representation who then went on to be Prime Minister. Nope, that never happened.

As you know, sarcasm aside, proportional representation was a core plank in the Reform Party platform.

Wyoming doesn't exist. It's just the sarlac pit Dick Cheney emerged from it. It's gets two senators like every other state, but if you actually counted it proportionally, you'd only get one vote for Satan.

Yeah....I agree.

They were the first place in the Americas to give the vote to women.
In 1869.
Just goes to show.......
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
As you know, sarcasm aside, proportional representation was a core plank in the Reform Party platform.



Yeah....I agree.

.......
And did the liberals want it then???


Edit: And by the way didn't the Reform party want an elected Senate much like the US ....equal number of senator per province....elected?
 
Last edited:

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Hmmm...not quite as good today.




39.6% actually.

Now, with these new facts, let's review...........



Things looked pretty good for your boy back in July........

In five months the Liberals have lost 2.7 percentage points.

In five months the Conservatives have gained 3.9 percentage points.

Ten months to go.

hmmmmmmm.


Liberals now pulling away from Cons into majority territory??



WRONG.


"Figures can lie and liars can figure":):):):)
 

KenW

New Member
Dec 16, 2014
3
0
1
It Is Neck and Neck as We Head into Election Year


[Ottawa – December 15, 2014] Yet another new normal has set into the Canadian political landscape as we head into an election year. Some unexpected events have altered the last normal which saw the rejuvenated Liberal Party – led by Justin Trudeau – clearly in the driver’s seat and on the cusp of what would likely have been a majority government (had those numbers persisted to Election Day). A renewed security focus and other events following the shootings in Ottawa have produced a virtual deadlock between the Liberals and the Conservatives.
Through a combination of propitious events and sound political game, Stephen Harper sees himself having gone from the real possibility of an unenviable descent from majority Prime Minister to leader of the third party, to now being in position to aspire to a fourth government. Not only has he wiped out virtually all of Mr. Trudeau’s double digit lead, he has raised his approval numbers and there is much less unanimity that the country is heading in the wrong direction.



http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/15122014_slide01.jpg