They were printing money to the tune that you needed a pillow case full just to buy a loaf of bread.
Lest We Forget
- Thread starter Liberalman
- Start date
OMG! You gotta be kidding!
The ONLY ones to ever win a war were bankers and they are never mentioned. There is historical evidence of the same international bankers funding both sides in so many wars you have to be dumber than a rock to miss it. The whole reason Lincoln got shot was the 'Greenback' dollar used to fund the north and his refusal to take loans from the same banks loaning money to the south. Andrew Jackson had several attempts on his life after dismantling the Second bank of the US (the Federal reserve of its time) and paying off the national debt. The banks have forced many wars to start without a care for who wins as long as both sides borrow to fund the conflict. Learn your history of how bankers have influenced conflicts for centuries and still do. Or just continue with your blind belief our current govts aren't controlled by bankers and mega-corps and our current wars aren't for profit.
Nah, Hitler was a madman. what bank would want anything to do with him? Blowing up assets isn't exactly lucrative! -
Boy, a tank must have cost a few truck loads.
But rebuilding after the bombing is very lucrative for the banks. They win with war and after war.Nah, Hitler was a madman. what bank would want anything to do with him? Blowing up assets isn't exactly lucrative! -
I think prospering for the banks is more the effects of the war than the cause. (It can just as easily go the other way)
I don't know enough about it to actually discuss it with any certainty, but I'm not sure that banks actually earn money, I think the bank is just a medium. I think it's another entity that actually issues war bonds...................no?
Well, in Canada we should have a lot of good hiding places for it. LOL ..................My first suggestion would be my back yard!
War bonds are another issue but still make money for the banks. What usually happens is a govt will actually borrow huge sums of money to finance a war. It is easier to get loans from the larger international banks than to sell bonds or impose new taxes. History has shown us that the banks don't care which side they are lending to and have in many, many cases given loans to both sides of the same conflict most notably in the US civil war and the US banks financing the Nazis and Britain at the same time. Wars are very profitable for the international bankers and keep nations deep in debt.
Young Boy Salutes Troops - YouTube
If anyone is at all curious about what many think our soldiers did in WWII, just watch that.
And of course you could always look up Appledorn's current program of assigning a Canadian soldiers grave to a student, who learns all about the soldier in that grave, then passes that on to the next generation entering the school system, as they exit it.
If you ask that child what it means to remember, and why they remember, they will tell you, Freedom through sacrifice.
At the end of the day, politics, bankers, and all the rest of that BS flies out the window, when it's your *** in the grass.
Anyone that has ever served knows that.
I think there is one fact regarding banks, that has to be brought out into the fore front, Nick. Banks are merely an accumulation of people like you and me, some richer some poorer and the bank profits are just the sum total of interest and dividends paid out to you and me and other depositors or investors if you like. It's also money paid out in interest and dividends to pension plans for common people. Of course there are rich, greedy people drawing interest and dividends too, but I really wonder if they are the majority. -
Canada's Highway of Heroes is Canada's equivalent of Britain's Wootton Bassett. Or Royal Wootton Bassett as it is now called.
Why was she allowed to wear a burkha in a supermarket anyway?
You are not normally allowed to wear a motorcycle helmet or some other face covering in a supermarket in order for the CCTV cameras to be able to see your, so this woman should have been told to remove her burka before entering the store.
It's another case of political correctness triumphing over good old commonsense.
Why was she allowed to wear a burkha in a supermarket anyway?
You are not normally allowed to wear a motorcycle helmet or some other face covering in a supermarket in order for the CCTV cameras to be able to see your, so this woman should have been told to remove her burka before entering the store.
It's another case of political correctness triumphing over good old commonsense.
For years I've seen bikers in full face helmets buy gas, buy smokes at convenience stores, run into the GT boutique and grab something.
Maybe we should stick to commonsense if we're going to ask people to stick to commonsense.
Like a plague it is.
Great... You'll post some kind of info on the 'bankers' that funded germany
Do you have any clue regarding where Hitler got his money from?
Hint: There is a certain cultural group that he stole a lot of wealth from.
You start there and get back to me later, m'kay?
Thanks for the tip on that... Whodda thunk that it cost money to (re)build something.
All the same, I'd really appreciate if you could provide a detailed explanation (maybe with a few links) that specifically articulate this conspiracy that the banks funded the wars