Krauthammer Tells Inconvenient Truth About Egypt

[Colpy]

I find the beliefs of the Americans of the south more worrisome than Islamic ideology. Colpy your fear mongering and ignorance of Islam is also worrisome.

I'm afraid, CUBert, that you are ignorant of the cult of Islam............

I like to compare the Prophet with David Koresh.....and Koresh comes out of the comparison quite well, thank you.

Mohammed was a war-mongering, murderous pedophile.

His religion is no better.

Islam itself means submission, to God's will, as interpreted by the Looney Prophet.

Look around, for God's sake.

Women wearing tents.

Honour killing.

Demands for the elimination of co-ed phys-ed and music in our schools.

Radical imams preaching Jihad, Canadians taking up the challenge.

Plotting mass murder, an attack on our institutions.

Traveling abroad to learn the use of weapons in jihad against Canada.

Yeah, but the south of the USA is scarier....uh-huh.

Ever met a Good Ole Boy?

I suggest you read Ayaan Hirsi Ali...Infidel.

Then Mark Steyn's America Alone.

Bullsh*t nothing..... they're your's and Eagle's own damn words, plus documented history's own words, which were of course written by the victors..... guess who they were?



Sorry, but it's you who needs to read up on history.... and no, those old WWII propaganda posters don't exactly count.



Learn how to read and perhaps you might understand that History you speak of better..... I Never said they sold arms to Germany, I said they supplied and manufactured for them.... which is TRADING. Trading goods and services for money or vice versa.... which includes supplying of various products and manufacturing various goods.



Indeed, but ever since they were forced into WWII and had to lose a bunch of troops like the rest of the allied nations, they feel they have the right to continually shove it in our faces and are continually justified in invading and/or attack any nation they damn well please..... all the while justifying their actions by pointing out what happened when they sat on their ass and did nothing while the rest of us did something about it...... while making a bit of profit from the enemy I might add.



Funny, I can't find any information or evidence of the US getting involved in hunting Nazi subs in WWII prior to declaring war, unless those subs were found within US waters of course.... care to "Educate" me on that little nugget?

And even if they did, big whoop..... they ran around hunting the odd sub while everybody else was on the ground or in the air fighting on the frontlines.



Why would the germans sink US ships trying to send them supplies? Indeed, that would be rediculous.

More Bull****....you said the Yanks were supplying Germany the same as the allies....and that is unmitigated crap. And your attempts to move the goalposts after you have been tackled and stomped just makes you look stupid and desperate.

Very little success on the allied part before the US became involved..........or did you miss us losing most of continental Europe?

Aside from the Battle of Britain, little success. Read some history, and let me explain something to you....I've spent my life reading history, and you know squat.

So where exactly did I say they hunted subs outside of US waters??? And if they were so buddy-buddy, why were the German subs hunting IN US waters?

It's that goalpost thing again....but that's OK, play away, on this field I can stomp you blindfolded and hobbled.

The simple fact is the United States were helping the Allied war effort in every way possible before they legally entered the war. Look up the correspondence between Churchill and Roosevelt....just for starters......

To accuse them of collusion with Germany is simply ****ing brain-dead, knee jerk anti-American bull**** promoted by those with little knowledge and less intellect.

On that note, Good Night.

 

[damngrumpy]

While I never cared for Bush and in fact I refer to him as having Gilligan looking after the island,
I can see how the Bush Family would befriend Hitler and it does not matter whether or not the
United States was at war or not. While we are throwing rocks at the Bush family we should
save a few for the Kennedy family as well. Joe Kennedy Senior referred to Hitler as the brightest
young man in Europe and contributed to the the Hitler election campaign.
Kennedy also told the President that Britain wouldn't last more than six to eight weeks. Of course
he was wrong.
The Bush family will always have their detractors and so will the Kennedy family, the problem is
they are now bound in the binding of the history books and its time to deal with the real problems
of the present.

 

[EagleSmack]

Canadian World War II Battles - Canada at War

Oh ya.... dead links are REAL stingers.

Works for me. Get a real computer.

Wow, facinating, you give me a link to a list of battles CANADIAN's were involved in..... where's the US battles prior them them officially joining into the war which was the original issue being discussed and the question I asked which you quoted?

Kind of makes your argument false doesn't it.

Based more on myth than fact.

Or are you just further attempting to drag this whole pile of crap so far off the original tangent that you and Colpy completely forget what's being discussed?

No... just making you look like a moron as always.

I might smoke some dope from time to time, but at least I'm not on the crack you're dishing out.

lol. Haven't had any for a month? Too funny

When you start bringing some facts that actually relate to what's being talked about, I'll let you know if you owned anything.

All you need to do is look at the dates and find out that you simply do not know what you are talking about.

Try and stay in the same flow without paddling off into the unknown.

I forgot, facts tend to send you off course.

Go back a few posts and figure out where you went astray...... man you really lost yourself in this one.... you can't even remember what you were responding to and what I was replying with, lmao.

Wow, you really got stumped.

Nice try..... seriously, smoke some more of that crack.... maybe you'll go so far into a trip, you'll make your way back to what we were all discussing...... the conversation was about what the US did prior to joining in the war..... not what battles Canadians fought in.

Thanks for playing though. :roll: cripes.... go get some sleep.

Somehow you were stating that you did more, it is false... it is a myth. I'm sorry but the facts are facts. To say the US wasn't supporting Britain with needed supplies is foolish. As far as fighting, check the dates. What did you learn?

I find the beliefs of the Americans of the south more worrisome than Islamic ideology. Colpy your fear mongering and ignorance of Islam is also worrisome.

Because your are dellusional for the most part. You are also about appeasment I would think. You feel that if you suck up to the ones that will really hurt you they will leave you alone.

 

[MHz]

It is,however, not a justification for not allowing Egyptians to have elections. If the tables were turned, would Americans agree that Egyptians should decide who is qualified to run in US elections? I doubt it.

You never know, they don't seem to mind Israel calling the shots on who will be a member of the US Gov.
Try getting in if you openly criticize Israel, lol

 

[TenPenny]

You never know, they don't seem to mind Israel calling the shots on who will be a member of the US Gov.
Try getting in if you openly criticize Israel, lol

Heck, you're not allowed to criticze Israel on this forum, much less in real life.

 

[MHz]

Heck, you're not allowed to criticze Israel on this forum, much less in real life.

Sorry I didn't realize that admitting Israel has our Gov by the balls (and squeezing) was a critiism.

 

[Praxius]

More Bull****....you said the Yanks were supplying Germany the same as the allies....and that is unmitigated crap.

No it's not, and no matter how often you call it Bullsh*t, it doesn't make it so. It doesn't change the fact that the US openly traded and dealed with the enemy until they finally joined into the war.... even you admitted this, so seriously, grow up and accept that you fuct up by opening your mouth and exposed the ignorance you cling on to.

And your attempts to move the goalposts after you have been tackled and stomped just makes you look stupid and desperate.

lol, oh my God, seriously...... I didn't move any goal posts or played any friggin football games with you. Both you and Eagle have shifted gears on your stories, tried to run off on additional tangents about other things in a very piss poor attempt to confuse the issue, and the only thing that ended up getting confused is you and Eagle as you tripped over everything you said that got tossed back at you...... that's not what looks like, that is what's stupid and desperate out of all of this.

Stomp your feet and continue to act like you somehow won an argument, others can clearly see what has been posted and see the crap you guys are spewing for what it truly is.

You guys are still stuck on showing US Democrats being just as evil and supportive of the Nazis as the Republicans..... which isn't much of a defence when you think about it and only makes your side of the argument far more worse....... and you still seem to be stuck on the idea that I somehow suggested that the US supplied the Nazis with weapons and arms, which I never once said...... so how about you get your sh*t together for once in your life, open your damn eyes and actually read what has been posted, rather then what you think was posted.

Go ahead..... just in case you think I might have edited what I said in the past to screw you up, go and read what you quoted from me (which I can't edit) and see for yourself that it's you who's completely lost track of what the hell everybody else here is talking about and it's you who's "moving the goal posts." :roll:

Frig, I thought someone who was older then me might be a little brighter then me, but you just destroyed that dream.

Very little success on the allied part before the US became involved..........or did you miss us losing most of continental Europe?

Ah, see there you go running off on another tangent and trying to "move the goal posts" again to try and sound all smart and hypocritical...... very little success because guess who was still trading and dealing with the enemy?

Oh and don't forget that the Germans were already begining to be pushed back before the US stepped foot on the shores due to the Battle of Britain, followed by Hitler's stupid mistake of going after the Soviet Union which spread his lines too far..... the US just tagged along for the ride and when it was all over, it was decades following of us listening to how they magically saved the day, when they were only a part of a larger picture.

Aside from the Battle of Britain, little success. Read some history, and let me explain something to you....I've spent my life reading history, and you know squat.

Well you need to read a little more sonny jim, cuz your knowledge and perspective of that history is pretty damn skewed. If you want a pissing match to make yourself sound all big and smart, I've been submerged in WWII history since I was born, having a father in the military who collected and still collects WWII medals, uniforms, books, videos, documents..... it was all around me and when I wanted to know something, I either picked it up and read it, or I asked..... I had the physical history in my hands every single day..... what did you have?

Some books your biased republican friends handed your way that omitted a few details.

By the way, I'm still waiting for those sources proving your claims of the US being involved in Sub hunting prior to officially joining into the war....... Where are they?

Or did you think constant bitching, moaning and stomping your feet would make me forget?

Or maybe you're just forgetful and forgot to supply it?

Which might mean you forgot a few other things over the years, like some of that so-called history you read up on.

Keep on digging that hole princess.

So where exactly did I say they hunted subs outside of US waters???

Ha ha.... my god, and you talk to me about moving goal posts? Defending their own waters and soverign territory isn't helping the allies, it's helping their own self interests and their own nation during a time of war...... which means they still didn't do jack sh*t in regards to sub hunting for or with the allies.

Show me a list of the German Subs they sank within their waters and territory prior to joining in on the actual war...... if you can even do that, since you can't even supply anything to back up your original claims.

And if they were so buddy-buddy, why were the German subs hunting IN US waters?

Duh.... didn't read much on your history did you?

To take some pot shots at allied navel ships that were in the area when the US's back was turned, which was turned quite often back in those days..... once again, show me a list of German Subs the US sunk or at the very least, shot a bullet towards, prior to declaring war.

If you can't do that, then just shut the fuc up and move on with your baseless ranting and moaning..... because it's getting old.

It's that goalpost thing again....but that's OK, play away, on this field I can stomp you blindfolded and hobbled.

Oh, I's so scared..... Eagle you best take that crack pipe away from Colpy, you gave him a little too much. :roll:

Rant on you little dream star, rant on.....

The simple fact is the United States were helping the Allied war effort in every way possible before they legally entered the war. Look up the correspondence between Churchill and Roosevelt....just for starters......

Gee, I'm pretty sure I already aknowledged that the US helped allies in a couple of ways..... certainly not in every way possible like you claim..... but the ORIGINAL point that started all of this crap was the FACT that Many bussinesses, individuals and yes.... Even those in the government of the US, supported and dealed with Nazi Germany while every other allied nation didn't and was fighting a bloody war against their oppression and conquests...... which you have yet to refute.

You don't even want to own up like an adult and aknowledge any of this, no you just want to beat around the bush, not answer any questions, avoid backing up any of your claims with any type of useful sources, or sources at all..... and just wish to further add on more and more tangents to this discussion in the dim hope that you might confuse those in here that you actually screwed up royally in this debate and they'll miss it.

Sorry jimmy bob, you even failed in that as well.

They helped in every way possible before entering the war you say?

Funny how they just joined the war when Germany was already begining to be pushed back..... let their allied friends do all the dirty work and then join in when it looks like they're winning, then try and take all the credit for decades to come.... how quaint.

They did everything possible?

They didn't stop trading with the Germans did they? They didn't slap embargos on Germany did they? Quite honestly, they didn't do a whole hell of a lot against Germany until Japan bombed their asses.

But keep on living that wonderful pipe dream of yours..... there's still some left in the bowel for you to huff.

To accuse them of collusion with Germany is simply ****ing brain-dead, knee jerk anti-American bull**** promoted by those with little knowledge and less intellect.

Uh-oh.... more foot stomping and now the insults with swearing come out...... along with the wonderful defense when one loses an argument "It's all Anti-American Bullsh*t!!!!"

Gee, I guess anytime somoene doesn't suck hole the US or Isreal and pamper their sorry ass it's all chalked up to Anti-Americanism or Anti-Semitic....... After all, they can never do any wrong.... everything they did throughout history has been just, right and true..... because if you don't agree, then I'll stomp my feet, cry like a friggin baby and call you Anti-American...... I'll call you someone being of less intellect, all the while twisting my insults your way so that they avoid breaking forum guidelines.

Grow up already, jesus. :roll:

On that note, Good Night.

It is a good night actually, thanks.

While I never cared for Bush and in fact I refer to him as having Gilligan looking after the island,
I can see how the Bush Family would befriend Hitler and it does not matter whether or not the
United States was at war or not. While we are throwing rocks at the Bush family we should
save a few for the Kennedy family as well. Joe Kennedy Senior referred to Hitler as the brightest
young man in Europe and contributed to the the Hitler election campaign.
Kennedy also told the President that Britain wouldn't last more than six to eight weeks. Of course
he was wrong.
The Bush family will always have their detractors and so will the Kennedy family, the problem is
they are now bound in the binding of the history books and its time to deal with the real problems
of the present.

Exactly, and I agree.... The US wasn't soured by just one political party's affiliation and admiration of Nazi Germany/Hitler..... it was on both sides of the political spectrum in the US, which is even worse.... and yes, the Kennedy's should be tossed into the fire along with the Bush's.

 

[lone wolf]

Here's one:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Reuben_James_(DD-245)

Doth thou not practice as thou preacheth?

 

[Praxius]

Works for me. Get a real computer.

Kind of makes your argument false doesn't it.

Based more on myth than fact.

No... just making you look like a moron as always.

lol. Haven't had any for a month? Too funny

All you need to do is look at the dates and find out that you simply do not know what you are talking about.

I forgot, facts tend to send you off course.

Wow, you really got stumped.

Hey Eagle, get a damn clue will ya?

If you're going to supply a link as your so-called evidence to back up whatever claim you thought you had, put a little effort into using some quotes to point out exactly wtf you're going on about...... If you're too damn lazy to quote the part in a long winded web page that somehow proves your point, then I'm going to be just as damn lazy in not bothering to run around that site looking for it.

When I and everybody else in here links a site as a source, they quote the main areas that relate to the discussion..... if you can't be bothered to do that, then don't bother showing up and wasting everybody's time.

Just as a reminder, the original question and area of debate was in relation to the US's military involvement in hunting/attacking German U-Boats (ie: Subs) prior to officially entering the war....... what I saw in your supplied link was a list of battles Canadian forces were involved in..... a long list of battles........ point out what part of this site supports your and Colpy's claims or piss off and stop wasting space.

Funny how everybody else in this thread also didn't understand wtf you were going on about with that link in relation to what was being discussed...... but I suppose it all makes sense to you and Colpy.... maybe if I smoked what you guys were smoking, it'd make sense to me as well.

*Puffs on Eagle's Crack Pipe*

I get it now! The crack makes the maple leafs and battles morph into american flags and american forces, and that's why it looks like they actually did something useful prior to entering the war!

My god it's so simple! Eagle and Colpy must have completely lost their friggin minds!!! Why didn't I think of it before!!?? :lol: :roll:

Somehow you were stating that you did more, it is false... it is a myth. I'm sorry but the facts are facts. To say the US wasn't supporting Britain with needed supplies is foolish.

Yes it would be foolish to say that..... it's too damn bad for you that I never once said that. Show me where I said the US WASN'T supporting Britain with supplies...... oh that's right, you can't, because I never did say that and you're just being a troll like you always are in here.

Now how about you act like the troll you are and go crawl back under that bridge you came from and keep on smoking that crack of yours.

As far as fighting, check the dates. What did you learn?

That Candians' fought in a lot of battles and you like to try and drag a debate so off track that you hope it will confuse the original conversation so nobody see's just how much you screwed up and how much you ended up looking like a dolt for opening your mouth about things you obviously know nothing about.

Because your are dellusional for the most part. You are also about appeasment I would think. You feel that if you suck up to the ones that will really hurt you they will leave you alone.

Ha ha...... yup..... keep on chasing that rainbow sunshine....... If anything has been shown in all my posts in this forum over the years, is that I suck up and kiss people's asses because I worry about what they might think about me or what they might do to me...... and I most certainly worry about saying the wrong thing that might offend someone.......

Here's one:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Reuben_James_(DD-245)

Doth thou not practice as thou preacheth?

Thanks, but the category is "US Ships that Hunted Subs for the Allies Prior to Entering the War" which Colpy claimed and I'm still waiting for an example..... not US ships that were sunk by German subs while escorting supplies to the Allies, which has already been acknowledged that the US supplied allies during WWII....... they also traded and supplied Nazi Germany in a number of ways as well, both politically and economically, especially with private businesses.

Thanks for playing though. :roll:

 

[lone wolf]

Hey Eagle, get a damn clue will ya?

If you're going to supply a link as your so-called evidence to back up whatever claim you thought you had, put a little effort into using some quotes to point out exactly wtf you're going on about...... If you're too damn lazy to quote the part in a long winded web page that somehow proves your point, then I'm going to be just as damn lazy in not bothering to run around that site looking for it.

When I and everybody else in here links a site as a source, they quote the main areas that relate to the discussion..... if you can't be bothered to do that, then don't bother showing up and wasting everybody's time.

Just as a reminder, the original question and area of debate was in relation to the US's military involvement in hunting/attacking German U-Boats (ie: Subs) prior to officially entering the war....... what I saw in your supplied link was a list of battles Canadian forces were involved in..... a long list of battles........ point out what part of this site supports your and Colpy's claims or piss off and stop wasting space.

Funny how everybody else in this thread also didn't understand wtf you were going on about with that link in relation to what was being discussed...... but I suppose it all makes sense to you and Colpy.... maybe if I smoked what you guys were smoking, it'd make sense to me as well.

*Puffs on Eagle's Crack Pipe*

I get it now! The crack makes the maple leafs and battles morph into american flags and american forces, and that's why it looks like they actually did something useful prior to entering the war!

My god it's so simple! Eagle and Colpy must have completely lost their friggin minds!!! Why didn't I think of it before!!?? :lol: :roll:



Yes it would be foolish to say that..... it's too damn bad for you that I never once said that. Show me where I said the US WASN'T supporting Britain with supplies...... oh that's right, you can't, because I never did say that and you're just being a troll like you always are in here.

Now how about you act like the troll you are and go crawl back under that bridge you came from and keep on smoking that crack of yours.



That Candians' fought in a lot of battles and you like to try and drag a debate so off track that you hope it will confuse the original conversation so nobody see's just how much you screwed up and how much you ended up looking like a dolt for opening your mouth about things you obviously know nothing about.



Ha ha...... yup..... keep on chasing that rainbow sunshine....... If anything has been shown in all my posts in this forum over the years, is that I suck up and kiss people's asses because I worry about what they might think about me or what they might do to me...... and I most certainly worry about saying the wrong thing that might offend someone.......

Thanks, but the category is "US Ships that Hunted Subs for the Allies Prior to Entering the War" which Colpy claimed and I'm still waiting for an example..... not US ships that were sunk by German subs while escorting supplies to the Allies, which has already been acknowledged.

Thanks for playing though. :roll:

Try reading the link (even fixed it so you don't have to do anything as complicated as a Google) Thanks for playing and come back again some time, eh?

BTW.... What the Hell do you think escort is all about? Dates for hire?

 

[Praxius]

Try reading the link. Thanks for playing and come back again some time, eh?

If you linked it right in the first place I would:

"Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name."

But I did find the page you were referring to and it states:

Upon the outbreak of war in Europe in September 1939, she joined the Neutrality Patrol, and guarded the Atlantic and Caribbean approaches to the American coast. In March 1941, Reuben James joined the convoy escort force established to promote the safe arrival of materiel to the United Kingdom. This escort force guarded convoys as far as Iceland, after which they became the responsibility of British escorts.

Based at Hvalfjordur, Iceland, she sailed from Naval Station Argentia, Newfoundland on 23 October 1941, with four other destroyers to escort eastbound convoy HX-156. While escorting that convoy at about 0525, 31 October 1941, Reuben James was torpedoed by U-552 commanded by Kapitänleutnant Erich Topp near Iceland.

What was the Neutrality Patrol?

The Neutrality Patrol, organized September 4th 1939 as a response to the war in Europe, was ordered to track and report the movements of any warlike operations of belligerents in the waters of the Western Hemisphere. To augment the fleet units already engaged in the Neutrality Patrol which President Roosevelt had placed around the eastern seaboard and Gulf ports, the Navy recommissioned 77 destroyers and light minelayers which had lain in reserve at either Philadelphia or San Diego.

The Neutrality Patrol led to U.S. warships assisting British Royal Navy vessels in convoying merchant shipping across the Atlantic Ocean. This placed U.S. naval personnel at considerable risk, as shown by the sinking of the destroyer USS Reuben James from Convoy HX-156 by U-552 on 31 October 1941.

Escorting and Offensive Military Action, ie: solely hunting for German U-Boats are two different things..... and when those US ships were in a convoy being attacked, did they engage or did they just tell the Brittish they were over there and let them do the dirty work?

Let's find out......

Nothing in the second link about the Neutrality Patrol, let's bounce back to the original link shall we?

Reuben James had positioned herself between an ammunition ship in the convoy and the known position of a "wolf pack", a group of submarines that preyed on Allied shipping. Reuben James was hit forward by a torpedo and her entire bow was blown off when a magazine exploded. The bow sank immediately. The aft section floated for five minutes before going down. Of the 159-man crew, only 44 survived.

Nope.... no Sub Hunting for them, they just played the human sheild and paid the price without firing one single shot in defence by the sounds of things. Because those US escort ships were unarmed, brilliant...... and so that's what?

One US ship sunk...... compared to how many other Allied ships sunk up to that point in time?

And you expect me to pat the US on the back? Well... geez, they did their part for king and country, as they say..... yet this sinking wasn't enough for the US to pull their mouth from Germany's teet and declare all out war on them..... I guess the profits of dealing with both sides in a war are worth more then the lives of 115 US citizens in the middle of the Atlantic trying to secure that profit.

Though after this incident, the US did decide to finally arm their ships so they could defend themselves..... but that's about as far as it went until Japan shoved a few bombs up their rear side........

.... Guess they should have joined in sooner.

Oh well.... still no evidence to back up Colpy's claims of sub hunting prior to joining into the war.

Once again.... thanks for playing.

Once again, in case you weren't following along.... Escort Duty is Escorting person(s) or an item from one location to another and defending if attacked..... you do not go out and seek conflict....... but how can you properly escort and defend if you're not armed to defend yourself or that which you're protecting?

You can't...... and it's certainly nowhere near what I'd consider "Sub Hunting."

 

[lone wolf]

Okay, Porter.... You can be right if it means soooo much to you. :roll:

WTF do you think ESCORT DUTY and ICELAND means?

BTW.... Tell Wikipedia to place ALL brackets within the quote - that way you don't have to say it wasn't properly done.

 

[Colpy]

If you linked it right in the first place I would:

"Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name."

But I did find the page you were referring to and it states:



What was the Neutrality Patrol?



Escorting and Offensive Military Action, ie: solely hunting for German U-Boats are two different things..... and when those US ships were in a convoy being attacked, did they engage or did they just tell the Brittish they were over there and let them do the dirty work?

Let's find out......

Nothing in the second link about the Neutrality Patrol, let's bounce back to the original link shall we?



Nope.... no Sub Hunting for them, they just played the human sheild and paid the price without firing one single shot in defence by the sounds of things. Because those US escort ships were unarmed, brilliant...... and so that's what?

One US ship sunk...... compared to how many other Allied ships sunk up to that point in time?

And you expect me to pat the US on the back? Well... geez, they did their part for king and country, as they say..... yet this sinking wasn't enough for the US to pull their mouth from Germany's teet and declare all out war on them..... I guess the profits of dealing with both sides in a war are worth more then the lives of 115 US citizens in the middle of the Atlantic trying to secure that profit.

Though after this incident, the US did decide to finally arm their ships so they could defend themselves..... but that's about as far as it went until Japan shoved a few bombs up their rear side........

.... Guess they should have joined in sooner.

Oh well.... still no evidence to back up Colpy's claims of sub hunting prior to joining into the war.

Once again.... thanks for playing.

Once again, in case you weren't following along.... Escort Duty is Escorting person(s) or an item from one location to another and defending if attacked..... you do not go out and seek conflict....... but how can you properly escort and defend if you're not armed to defend yourself or that which you're protecting?

You can't...... and it's certainly nowhere near what I'd consider "Sub Hunting."

You have no clue. In 1940, putting yourself between the "wolf pack" and the merchant ships WAS sub hunting........

Submarines, unlike in the movies, usually attacked while on the surface, so placing yourself between them and the convoy is the exact tactic you use to engage them.

There go those goal posts again......your original accusation was that the USA was aiding the German war effort early in the war........now you are trying to argue the effectiveness of American efforts AGAINST German military operations.

You've already lost the argument.

Give it up.

 

[ironsides]

Bedbugs and Islamic Fruitcakes

http://dotsub.com:80/media/b5ee5ada-5b37-4b0b-9916-e0896337ec4b/e/m

 

[CUBert]

I'm afraid, CUBert, that you are ignorant of the cult of Islam............

I like to compare the Prophet with David Koresh.....and Koresh comes out of the comparison quite well, thank you.

Mohammed was a war-mongering, murderous pedophile.

His religion is no better.

Islam itself means submission, to God's will, as interpreted by the Looney Prophet.

Look around, for God's sake.

Women wearing tents.

Honour killing.

Demands for the elimination of co-ed phys-ed and music in our schools.

Radical imams preaching Jihad, Canadians taking up the challenge.

Plotting mass murder, an attack on our institutions.

Traveling abroad to learn the use of weapons in jihad against Canada.

Yeah, but the south of the USA is scarier....uh-huh.

Ever met a Good Ole Boy?

I suggest you read Ayaan Hirsi Ali...Infidel.

Then Mark Steyn's America Alone.

Yes, in - fact the US government is much more detrimental to world peace than even radical islam. if you didn't ignore the history of u.s foreign policy you'd know this.

 

[Colpy]

The best comment yet on Egypt......

SteynOnline - PHAROAHS AND FAIRY TALES

Oh, BTW, here is the most interesting link from Steyn's column.....secularized rebellion by the youth of the nation, my furry arse!!!!

http://pajamasmedia.com/phyllisches...-womens-rights-in-egypt-a-photographic-story/

 

[CUBert]

uh huh. Read about the MB......lovely bunch!

Muslim Brotherhood

Anzalone: The Muslim Brotherhood Myth | Informed Comment

 

[Johnny Utah]

:smile::smile:
This thread needs to lighten up..

 

[gopher]

'' US government is much more detrimental to world peace than even radical islam''


did you know that Bush was inspired by God (the prince of peace) to attack Iraq?

 

[DaSleeper]

This reminds me of Gopher:lol:

YouTube - Curb Your Enthusiasm Bush Joke