Does the article explain that opposition to coal exports has been ongoing for decades now?
But I suppose in your world where First Nations all 100% behind the Kinder Morgan expansion nobody anywhere is against coal either.
If you were to look into it would would find that the opposition to coal exports in America is what is forcing coal up into Vancouver. Or at least trying to.
Read it.
“Climate activists do not provide solutions toward providing the world a reliable energy source, 40 per cent of which right now is provided by coal and (which is also) used to manufacture steel products. Instead, they seek to limit the availability of this product,” said David Crook, Westshore Terminal’s manager of engineering and environmental services.
Westshore, in Tsawwassen, already handles U.S. coal for export overseas.
Crook also said that restricting coal exports from British Columbia would have no tangible effect in reducing global coal use, noting that coal to be shipped through Surrey Fraser Docks represented 0.1 per cent of world coal production.
He also argued that the relationship of coal and climate change was not a matter of local jurisdiction. That has also been the position of Port Metro Vancouver, which is the main regulatory authority for the Surrey Fraser Docks project.
United Steelworkers official Scott Lunny reminded directors there are jobs tied to the coal industry in British Columbia, adding almost all coal produced in B.C. is used to produce steel.