Khadr to get 10.5 million payment for treason.
- Thread starter Colpy
- Start date
Let's all pretend that the ten-and-a-half mil woulda gone to homeless vets if Khadr didn't get it.
Hopefully this image is in the back of everyone's minds on the next election
I can't take credit for the pic here is where it comes from
https://twitter.com/AndrewLawton/status/882625666142928899
Screwing vets is one thing the Libs and the Tories agree on completely.
Being outraged about this is completely SJW by the way.
Looks like conservatives are having an identity crisis.
Looks like conservatives are having an identity crisis.
It's just been confirmed that Khdar was paid the $10.5 M yesterday.
Omar Khadr receives $10.5M from Ottawa, sources say - Politics - CBC News
Omar Khadr receives $10.5M from Ottawa, sources say - Politics - CBC News
It's an ignorant misrepresentation to blame Trudeau and the Liberals for this. It was a judicial decision, not a political decision, the executive branch of the government had nothing to do with it.
I think there are three basic facts in this that many people are overlooking. First of all a killing in the combat of war is not considered to be murder. The fact that he admitted the killing to get transferred to another prison can not be construed as guilty beyond reasonable doubt. The fact he was 15 when all this started pretty much waters down his culpability in the process. JMHO.
Poor poor baby.....
In some parts of the world 15 is old enough to get married and have children, and yes kill other people.....
In some parts of the world 15 is old enough to get married and have children, and yes kill other people.....
And in some parts of the world, they don't have human rights legislation. What's your point?
Actually, you're wrong. A court cannot convict someone of an offense unless each element of the offense is proved beyond a reasonable doubt. An admission of guilt, if accepted by the court is the standard of proof required to establish a conviction. The court has the obligation to determine that the defendant fully understands the charge, terms, and sentence, and has option not to accept the guilty plea, and will not accept it if it does not meet strict parameters and is not agreed to by both the defense and prosecution.
It was a judicial decision to approve and accept the settlement that was agreed to by both the Government and the claimant. It was not a judicial decision for the Government to accept the settlement, it could have been rejected and brought before the court to determine the outcome. The decision to accept this deal was political.
Last edited:
The settlement was agreed to in order to AVOID the lawsuit. The court had nothing to do with the actual settlement.