Damn good writing and thinking! I am not an avowed monarchist but that made sense to me.
And it is because of attitudes like that that we have separatists. What ever happened to love thy neighbour as thyself?I don't need to be respectful to separatists. As far as I am comcerned they are worth no more than dog shyte under my shoes and they are worth about the same amount of respect as aforementioned shyte.
And it is because of attitudes like that that we have separatists. What ever happened to love thy neighbour as thyself?
And it is because of attitudes like that that we have separatists. What ever happened to love thy neighbour as thyself?"Love thy neighbour"? You a commie?
And it is because of attitudes like that that we have separatists. What ever happened to love thy neighbour as thyself?
Oh, and I am a first generation Canadian of British decent. I think the monarchy has long outlived it's usefulness (if it was ever useful.)
Typical of the monarchist mind set that views some people as being inferior to others.
I have some blue blood but I never noticed even the slightest purplish tinge when I bleed.Blue blood flows thinly in the population, especially among churlish subjects.
and my family on the French side has been here over 400 years and the Native side...well...a fu ck of a lot longer than that. Still doesn't change the fact of what Canada is and has always been. If some useless separatist wants to try and change that, he can kiss my ass on HIS/HER way out the door.
Separatists purpose is to destroy the Country that my family and I have spent over 400 years helping to build. They can kiss my ass.
Nothing lasts forever, fortunately. Countries are constantly changing. Canada included. It'll be nice when we finally get rid of that ancient and useless institution. Hell, even if it served a purpose Id want to get rid of it. No family or person deserves to hold such a position just because of who they happened to be born to.
And replace it with what??
And how do we do that??
Personally, I think the Monarchy is important. I think the republicans take the wrong view: they see the Monarchy as representative of centuries of oppression. I see the constitutional Monarchy as a symbol of our victory over repression, especially on occasions such as the Speech from the Throne, when the elected gov't has its hand up the Monarch's arse, actually moving her lips.....a puppet to democracy.
That in itself is worth keeping
The only reason why some are against it is,why do we have to pay when they come here to visit,shouldn't they pay for their travel/time spent here,like anyone on vacation?
And replace it with what??
And how do we do that??
Personally, I think the Monarchy is important. I think the republicans take the wrong view: they see the Monarchy as representative of centuries of oppression. I see the constitutional Monarchy as a symbol of our victory over repression, especially on occasions such as the Speech from the Throne, when the elected gov't has its hand up the Monarch's arse, actually moving her lips.....a puppet to democracy.
That in itself is worth keeping
The only reason why some are against it is,why do we have to pay when they come here to visit,shouldn't they pay for their travel/time spent here,like anyone on vacation?
Gerry is the typical example of the shallow minded not capable of grasping the nuances and subtleties that are involved in the question of separatism vs. federalism. As in pretty much everything, it is the hard liners that often end up sabotaging any attempt at a creative compromise.
Using the threat of separation is in no way conducive to any "compromise". Take it off the table and then let's see what can be done. Otherwise, as long as the threat of separation is on the table, you can kiss my ass for anything.