Clap, clap clap, you can use google. So which one is being blamed on CO2 that is causing today's issues?
Peer reviewed by other "Climate Scientists"?
That's like all the gay Disney characters voting to decide which female Disney character has the nicest tits.
None of them are real and the tits are all drawn.
This is a ridiculous attitude, science isn't set in stone and modern planetary study is a well established branch of Physics.
As a protege of James Van Allen, one of the founders of planetary studies, James Hansen was well suited to working in the field he did, over forty years of it spent at NASA's GISS, most of it as its director.
Going by your criteria we can totally discount people like Isaac Newton who was more of an alchemist than he was a scientist, having spent more than two decades trying to create The Philosophers Stone.