It Seems Impossible (Declaring the Holocaust a Myth)

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
I'm guessing it won't...
It will be awhile longer that he can hold his breath.

You for got to mention that you called them "Illuminati" and "Rothschild's".
Actually I try to avoid the 'I' word. I prefer Rothschild Henchmen. (or Minion when they are tools, like you), followed by the description given in the account when 'their man' knows the results of Waterloo and he whistled off to England to tell the results only to his Master. Before a full week was over that news allowed one man to gain possession of almost all of England's businesses. They are very good at what they do, too bad their moves are usually devoid of any trace of compassion towards any but their own. Eventually even that reign will come too an end. Hopefully something a little more peaceful than impalement on a slender white spruce. The bad ones get the pine so the dash of turpentine adds a little extra before the release of death arrives.

I can understand why they ran away. For the same reasons your invisible friend killed himself.
Actually the last time I heard of that was in some report on 9/11 where an air-traffic controller was speaking to somebody from NORAD about getting some fighters to track some wayward planes.

Bet it happens before you answer any questions, or concede when proven wrong.
Anytime you want to post those 14 (and climbing) questions I will shuffle them to the top of my list of things to reply to here.

Given that you described yourself and your sister as short and bald, maybe your parents were trying to keep Canada beautiful when they signed the papers to have you and your sister fixed.
What makes you think they signed anything?

Happen to you often?
You really are out of touch aren't you? lol
That would be a one time thing for everybody, except JC. Depending if His date of birth was in the same days as the 40 days after resurrection then He would qualify as death not making Him late for that anniversary of His birth. For anybody else if you are expecting them to show up you might as well start twiddling your thumbs as soon as you get to the 'party'.

So how many Jews died in the Holocaust? - Rough numbers would suffice - Not a long cut, paste as per Donkey Man - But approx numbers.
Far to many even (insert number that is 1 less than the number of Palestinian Arabs who have been systematically murdered going back to 11/47) that number is to many when the reason is based on who has the right to breath over another person's right to not have that breath taken away any earlier than determined by God and that is the number I would use to describe a Holocaust.

Trying to stay within your guidelines the Jews in Poland suffered the worse in terms of numbers. With about 600,000 Jews in Germany itself and more than 200,000 surviving with breath intact I would have to question if Germans spearheaded the concept of the camps. The Naziz SS had some very mentally disturbed people in it's ranks.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Like you and especially Dex you just duck out of the conversation and refuse to answer specific questions.
Alright MHz, I'll try to explain this to you one more time, since you keep taking shots at me in conversations I'm not really much engaged in.

The questions I refuse to answer are the ones that assume a whole lot of things are true that in fact are demonstrably false, and have been demonstrated to YOU as false, but you simply deny the evidence and arguments and continue on your merry misguided way. This occurs most often in discussions of Christian scripture, because you take it to be a literally true and correct description of reality when it's actually mythology (and you don't know what that means either), and in particular you take the Book of Revelation and the apocalyptic passages in Daniel and Isaiah as recording a history of the future. Then you ask a question based on that, which to me is incoherent and meaningless and doesn't deserve a response. You do it with science too. You've cited a cartoonist's work in support of your claims of the expanding earth, for example, ignoring or denigrating several centuries of serious scientific investigation by people far better qualified than you or me, then ask a question based on that, which is similarly incoherent and meaningless and doesn't deserve a response. Your questions aren't ignored for no reason, they're ignored because they're rooted in willful ignorance.

Just to clarify, calling scripture mythology doesn't mean it's wrong or dumb. It means it's a story, of the sort humans have been inventing since we were first sitting around campfires in the evenings. It's about archetypes, heroes and victims, winners and losers, good versus evil, and the constant human struggle to make sense of things, expressed in symbolic and metaphorical terms. In that context it's both important and useful. Read some Joseph Campbell. But as I told eanassir in another thread, to take it as a literal description of reality seems to me to be foolish beyond description. It's like taking the Greek and Roman myths as literally true, and I'm sure you know better than that.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
You lucked out then, I also hope it came out your nose. The addiction would only be if the coffee and the keyboard and the screen were nothing more than words on a page.
I'm glad you now understand that. Have you looked into any English reading and comprehension classes yet?

Please go right ahead, chat between yourselves.
Good idea. We aren't like to get much of an intelligent and engaging conversation if you were involved.

I love to see living examples of 'quality time' unfold before me.
I figured you watched life pass you by, all the time.
I'm not sure why you didn't warn Goober about the dangers of the 'rating button' as some might abuse it by doing something akin to a drive-by.
Ah, are you getting thumbs down from Goober?

Maybe you should ask yourself if you had something to do with that.

I know you won't, that genetic disorder seems to have prevented you from acknowledging the basics of reality.

Besides posting to anything that has your handle associated with it there is no stupidity involved.
At my end anyways.

My stance on any topic I have covered has some form of back-up.
Kojak had back up as well, and very much like your back up, his back up was the fancy of a fiction writer.
Had I been drinking coffee when Dex chimed in his full support to the hijacking with box-cutters as advertised by the US Gov I certainly would have (and many many other people) been swapping out their keyboards.
Ya sudden realizations and the impact of reality, has that affect on some people. Sadly, it was only fleeting with you.

It will be awhile longer that he can hold his breath.
Oh Goober knows enough not to hold out hopes that you'll ever post anything relevant, no worries there.

Actually I try to avoid the 'I' word. I prefer Rothschild Henchmen. (or Minion when they are tools, like you), followed by the description given in the account when 'their man' knows the results of Waterloo and he whistled off to England to tell the results only to his Master. Before a full week was over that news allowed one man to gain possession of almost all of England's businesses. They are very good at what they do, too bad their moves are usually devoid of any trace of compassion towards any but their own. Eventually even that reign will come too an end. Hopefully something a little more peaceful than impalement on a slender white spruce. The bad ones get the pine so the dash of turpentine adds a little extra before the release of death arrives.


How "Christian" of you.

Actually the last time I heard of that was in some report on 9/11 where an air-traffic controller was speaking to somebody from NORAD about getting some fighters to track some wayward planes.
Yep, that about sums up the comprehension issue.

Anytime you want to post those 14 (and climbing) questions I will shuffle them to the top of my list of things to reply to here.
No you won't, they're in the threads that spawned them, feel free to do your own leg work. If you're actually serious and all.

What makes you think they signed anything?
You're right, my bad. Given the poor genetic stock, you were likely wards of the state.

You really are out of touch aren't you? lol
Nope, I've never been late for my own birthday. But then again, I come from obviously better genetic stock, since I was never physically removed from my parents custody, like yourself.

(insert number that is 1 less than the number of Palestinian Arabs who have been systematically murdered going back to 11/47)
That would be approx 180,000 - 1 = 179,000.

Trying to stay within your guidelines the Jews in Poland suffered the worse in terms of numbers. With about 600,000 Jews in Germany itself and more than 200,000 surviving with breath intact I would have to question if Germans spearheaded the concept of the camps. The Naziz SS had some very mentally disturbed people in it's ranks.
Wow, talk about contradicting your self in less then a single breath.



Alright MHz, I'll try to explain this to you one more time, since you keep taking shots at me in conversations I'm not really much engaged in.

The questions I refuse to answer are the ones that assume a whole lot of things are true that in fact are demonstrably false, and have been demonstrated to YOU as false, but you simply deny the evidence and arguments and continue on your merry misguided way. This occurs most often in discussions of Christian scripture, because you take it to be a literally true and correct description of reality when it's actually mythology (and you don't know what that means either), and in particular you take the Book of Revelation and the apocalyptic passages in Daniel and Isaiah as recording a history of the future. Then you ask a question based on that, which to me is incoherent and meaningless and doesn't deserve a response. You do it with science too. You've cited a cartoonist's work in support of your claims of the expanding earth, for example, ignoring or denigrating several centuries of serious scientific investigation by people far better qualified than you or me, then ask a question based on that, which is similarly incoherent and meaningless and doesn't deserve a response. Your questions aren't ignored for no reason, they're ignored because they're rooted in willful ignorance.

Just to clarify, calling scripture mythology doesn't mean it's wrong or dumb. It means it's a story, of the sort humans have been inventing since we were first sitting around campfires in the evenings. It's about archetypes, heroes and victims, winners and losers, good versus evil, and the constant human struggle to make sense of things, expressed in symbolic and metaphorical terms. In that context it's both important and useful. Read some Joseph Campbell. But as I told eanassir in another thread, to take it as a literal description of reality seems to me to be foolish beyond description. It's like taking the Greek and Roman myths as literally true, and I'm sure you know better than that.
And that ladies and gentlemen, is how you hand someone their ass, and make it look like it was being served up in a 3 Michelin star rated restaurant.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Alright MHz, I'll try to explain this to you one more time, since you keep taking shots at me in conversations I'm not really much engaged in.
That's true I have mentioned your name a few times and I have also included a few specific examples. The shots were originally targetd at your current 'understanding' in the physics of 'subduction' as currently promoted. Canada's west coast and the creation of the Rockies starting about 200M years ago. I don't think your version allows for 'continental drift' that is shown by the long term history of the 'hotspot' under Yellowstone was some distance to the east from it's present location. That same movement would have included all of the Canadian Shield also moving that same distance in that same time. The Atlantic rift should have been responsible fot the movement IF the movement matches the known data about the age of the seafloor, something that just became available less than 50 years ago. That needs to blend in with existing models and in the examples I have started to mention there is more conflict than there is agreement. Those areas are things you refuse to consider. That makes you close minded and your arrogance starts to show when you keep posting after you have made all your points but the content is now focused on the charactor flaws in me as determined by you, a person who is close minded to begin with. Back to the Atlantic, one or both shores should show signs of subduction that would have to be very similar to the eastern slope of the Rockies and covering all the lands to the west until you hit the rift just off the shore of BC. The Pacific and Atlantic rifts are expanding at about the same rate (at the moment). In the Pacific the string of islands that make up Hawaii is also cause by a hotspot that is stationary and the crust moves. Using GoogleEarth 5 you can follow that mountain chain to the west (in a relative straight line) for some distance and then it takes a sharp turn and the mountain chain heads mostly northwards (again in a relatively straight line). A 'discussion' would then involve matching all those items to a time-line. When it is the east-west movement can be measured but the south-north movement all happens in the same color band. (the highest resolution map might be more revealing in narrowing that time down some) The time of the change in direction should also be compared to the track of the Yellowstone hotspot to see if it ever took a northerly route that matches the movement of the Pacific plate. It is also a possibility that the 'hot-spot' was not always in a static location in the mantle. Even after all that it would show/not show that the location of the actual rift off the coast of BC was at one time under the eastern portion of the Rockies. If your mental functions prevent you from exploring those sorts of 'possibilities'. When it comes to 'oddities' like the Snake River. Two miles of mountains can erode yet not be carried away any further than the base of the mountains over the course of a few million years and then over a few more million years the 'rubble' is eroded away' yet the 'newly exposed mountains ' now resist almost all erosion. That is the explanation for the flow of the Snake when it cuts straight through a mountain ridge that is part of the Rockies. I may not have the correct answer but I'm quite convinced that 'theory' needs some more work.

The questions I refuse to answer are the ones that assume a whole lot of things are true that in fact are demonstrably false, and have been demonstrated to YOU as false, but you simply deny the evidence and arguments and continue on your merry misguided way.
All you do is reference somebodies 'work' that you have accepted as being a 'fact'.

This occurs most often in discussions of Christian scripture, because you take it to be a literally true and correct description of reality when it's actually mythology (and you don't know what that means either), and in particular you take the Book of Revelation and the apocalyptic passages in Daniel and Isaiah as recording a history of the future.
Actually it covers every topic just as equally, the Christian one sticks out because it was our first discussion, the trend of you presenting your 'facts' (somebody elses 'theory') and then closing off all discussion was also established in that very same conversation and it holds true for all other ones. So if you see a 'pattern' for me I would also tend to assume that you do not see yourself as having a 'pattern' of response.
And really how hard is it to have an opinion on whether of not you would see an object coming at you if the combined closing rate was greater than the speed of light?

Then you ask a question based on that, which to me is incoherent and meaningless and doesn't deserve a response.
Why not respond with a 'I don't know, some of the Bible is incoherent and meaningless when I read it.' I certainly used to admit that about the book of Job rather than offer an opinion that tried to mask that fact. That doesn't mean there were not parts that I was sure I understood enough to speak up on (w2ith some degree of confidence). So I have no problem finding something in the Bible that offers God's opinion and/or view on many subjects so that also means I don't find the Bible incoherent or meaningless in any degree anymore on the subjects we have touched on. You sit in ignorance (self admitted just above) of the Bible's prophecies yet I am the stupid one in any/all conversations. lol

You do it with science too.
Starting with old earth creation or just 'science as written today.

You've cited a cartoonist's work in support of your claims of the expanding earth, for example, ignoring or denigrating several centuries of serious scientific investigation by people far better qualified than you or me,
You enjoyed the 'How the Earth was Made series didn't you. They used the same form of animation to show the 'uplifting' of land in several places. Here is how closed minded and how impossible it is for you to 'update' your own mind. Neal Adams did the animation but, as I have mentioned to you several times, he is not the 'scientist' that came up with the theory.

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]THE EARTH IS[/FONT] [FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]GROWING AND EXPANDING RAPIDLY[/FONT]​
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]by[/FONT]​
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]EXTERNAL ACCRETION[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif](METEORITES, DUST AND SOLAR ENERGY)[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]and[/FONT]​
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]INTERNAL CORE EXPANSION[/FONT]​
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif](BY GRAVITATIONALLY INDUCED HEATING)[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif](The mechanisms and a new cosmology)[/FONT]​
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Lawrence S. Myers[/FONT]​
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif](Revised 29 April 2005)[/FONT]​
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The map shown here is PROOF of Earth's growth and expansion in just the last ~200 million years--proving there were NO oceans (now covering over 70% of the planet) when it was 40% smaller than it is today.[/FONT]​
That didn't copy very well and I don't agree with the part about the oceans. All the water we have today was there 200M years ago (liquid and vapor, no ice) so as they wind back the clock and the Pacific and Atlantic became smaller in size the water would be forced up onto the land. Before 200M ago the earth could have been almost completely covered by water (like Alberta). That shows I don't swallow everything promoted but that doesn't mean I am willintg to ignore their main argument and that is based on the scientific dating of the age of the worlds Oceanic Crust.

then ask a question based on that, which is similarly incoherent and meaningless and doesn't deserve a response. Your questions aren't ignored for no reason, they're ignored because they're rooted in willful ignorance.
The way it works is when you cannot respond to a pointed question you start the personal insults, like claiming my replies have no foundation and just above I have shown what foundation they do have, as far as science is on that one topic. As far as Scripture most involved conversations are at least 10 pages and often time it will go past 20. I doubt you have ever carried it past the 1st page where you dump your 'understanding' and then the topic is closed to any further words.

Just to clarify, calling scripture mythology doesn't mean it's wrong or dumb.
That part comes in if I don't agree about your statement. about it being a 'myth'.

It means it's a story, of the sort humans have been inventing since we were first sitting around campfires in the evenings.
The Bible claims to be otherwise though, in particular when it comes to the 'prophecies' that even Moses was giving a few details about. I doubt very much they had very much spare time but id the first books were oral stories then they were repeated endlessly so as to not allow for change. I don't agree with that view entirely either since they were written down only during the exile into Babylon. Any corrections could have been made by God and if Jesus used baptism of the Holy Spirit to assiat the writers of the 4 Gospels of the NT then God would have provided the same help for the writers that were in Babylon. The best choice as writers that God is involved with would be Daniel and his named friends (furnace event).
It's about archetypes,
It's about transition and growth and all verses lead in the direction of two events and each or those events is a way-point for profound changes

Ge:3:15:
And I will put enmity between thee and the woman,
and between thy seed and her seed;
it shall bruise thy head,
and thou shalt bruise his heel.

The hertiage of the 12 Tribes was so the bruise to the heel could take place, some OT prophecies were fulfilled back then, the remainder will be fulfilled when the bruise to Satan's head happens. We were given the 'task' to put all the various pieces together that gives about as much detail as any single Gospel is in length.

heroes and victims,
The first thing determined by God that fateful day was a division between men that would become loyal to Satan's methods and some that would resist that and take a path that was more pleasing in God's view that would allow for the bruises to play out. Cain and Able was the fulfillment of that portion of the 'big picture'. It was a division that is only 'healed' by a day called Judgment Day. On that day enmity between men is wiped out forever and the memories of events on this world are forgotten and new memories begin to be built in a world that is full of immortal beings
winners an losers,
At it's most basic level even Satan ends up with a kingdom although it is not specified id he is a king once everybody is in the lake, very much alive. Humans are in another place that begins just like the world described in Ge:2. God has everything He created in the places that are best for them. If your head is not shaking already it certainly will once you 'hear' that only after the start of that period are the Holy Angels given permission to marry and their numbers will start to increase from that point on. A move the goat-herder of 2500BC knew only too well, yet it escapes your current view. If you cannot understand the words of simple men what hope is there for you? In real term a passage in the NT makes you precious to God just because your wife has belief in Jesus being factual (no way am I trying to endorse the RCC leadership so your wife's faith is described in the 7 letters. That is neither here nor there other than it being my impression is you are unaware of that passage even existing, yet you have the knowledge to determine the accurate understanding presented in the books you listed. If that is not bad enough it is too the point that any argument is met with deafness and that is when the mockery comes out in an increased manner. (don't get me wrong, I'm not offended I just find the tactic as being somewhat shallow, I hope that is not a step up for you. I also assume you are somewhat honored to have Bear adopt one of your statements as a sig, that just makes you a fuktard.

good versus evil,
Really Dex, most people would have said it was Satan against God which makes it evil vs good. Yet you have openly called God a 'prick' so it is no wonder that Satan is the 'good-guy'.

and the constant human struggle to make sense of things,
You mean the phrase that relates to things being this way because it is God's will and God leaves lots of room for getting the right verses but the wrong understanding. To make the prophecies of the OT complex yet in harmony is a real challenge to your theory that it is a book of unconnected myths, you can't even admit to that.

expressed in symbolic
At times yes, Daniel and Revelation are the best examples, why do you not also take into consideration that in those 'visions' an explanation also follows that explains the symbols. If the 'man of sin' is exposed only after he has been in operation then it would be a 'conflict' for the Bible to identify him any earlier. Your method at that point is to declare it to be a 'badly written' myth.

and metaphorical terms.
Don't stop there, there is also the blending of Daniel and Revelation that can be pieced together very nicely yet the 'authors' could not have possibly understood that we could apply those connection to our place and time. (being right or wrong is not a factor, the recreation of Israel is proof that some believe those words)


In that context it's both important and useful. Read some Joseph Campbell. But as I told eanassir in another thread, to take it as a literal description of reality seems to me to be foolish beyond description. It's like taking the Greek and Roman myths as literally true, and I'm sure you know better than that.
We have only scratched the topics God covers, had our past conversations been somewhat different I might have found it worthwhile time-wise to discuss some of those other topics. You recently went to a funeral, the Bible gives a person a full month to grieve the loss of somebody as close as a parent or sibling and after that time it is time to 'move on with daily life without the company of grief' Under the 'norms' for our society (Canada) would that be a healthy outlook as viewed by our medical community and would that also be how you feel if it was your wife who went into deep grief, which is okay, yet after a period twice as long (60 days) that her mental heath becomes a concern in that she is held by an emotion that should not become a way of life. As it is, I actually typed it out as part of a post and then deleted it as it would have been wasted words, same as this whole post is. It was an example, no real reply is expected or wanted.

I'm glad you now understand that. Have you looked into any English reading and comprehension classes yet?
I thought the answer was obvious, perhaps you are still struggling to understand your own conclusions.

Good idea. We aren't like to get much of an intelligent and engaging conversation if you were involved.
Probably explains why less that 1% of any of your posts are directed at each other. Don't want to abuse that stimulation thing. lol

I figured you watched life pass you by, all the time.
Ah, are you getting thumbs down from Goober?
The years on probation weren't the best of times since I decided to follow ther stipulations, stay away from others in the same situation.

Maybe you should ask yourself if you had something to do with that.
There are certainly some paths I have gone down that needed to be backed out of as they held no long term future. I don't ever recall bragging about those wasted steps.

I know you won't, that genetic disorder seems to have prevented you from acknowledging the basics of reality.
Like being turned down for a date by a chick in the bar who admitted that she like me but I looked too much like her dad for us to repeat our sexual encounter. Little shocking to somebody who was only 22. lol Hearing the same thing today might make me question what sort of father she had and if the 'looks like' came from when my face was between her thighs and all she should see was the bald-spot.

At my end anyways.
Carry on with that looping thought.

Kojak had back up as well, and very much like your back up, his back up was the fancy of a fiction writer.
Ya sudden realizations and the impact of reality, has that affect on some people. Sadly, it was only fleeting with you.
How much mulla did going bald net him? Quite a bit and yes he did have a script so who had the wisdom, the actor or the screenplay writer?

Oh Goober knows enough not to hold out hopes that you'll ever post anything relevant, no worries there.
Now you are mind-reader, wow. Don't hold your breath only means a delay, not eternal silence according to Dex. lol

How "Christian" of you.
Haven't read much of the Bible have you? That sort treatment is from the Heathens of the OT, King Darius in this case..

Da:6:24:
And the king commanded,
and they brought those men which had accused Daniel,
and they cast them into the den of lions,
them,
their children,
and their wives;
and the lions had the mastery of them,
and brake all their bones in pieces or ever they came at the bottom of the den.

Yep, that about sums up the comprehension issue.
In your case the lack of it. as the recording is still available.

No you won't, they're in the threads that spawned them, feel free to do your own leg work. If you're actually serious and all.
You said you had them right in front of you. liar.

You're right, my bad. Given the poor genetic stock, you were likely wards of the state.
Taking away the prospect of being married certainly made her a ward of the state.

Nope, I've never been late for my own birthday. But then again, I come from obviously better genetic stock, since I was never physically removed from my parents custody, like yourself.
Totally clueless. lol

That would be approx 180,000 - 1 = 179,000.
Are you sure that Nun didn't have you under her skirt most of the time?
180,000 - 1 = 179,999
Wow, talk about contradicting your self in less then a single breath.
The Germans are the maters of efficiency yet they preserve the life of many Jews in WWII

And that ladies and gentlemen, is how you hand someone their ass, and make it look like it was being served up in a 3 Michelin star rated restaurant.
SAo this place is a "3 Michelin star rated restaurant". You really are 'out to lunch'.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
I thought the answer was obvious,
That's what I said.

perhaps you are still struggling to understand your own conclusions.
No, just your delusions.

Probably explains why less that 1% of any of your posts are directed at each other.
No, that would be because I'm not prone to talking to myself. But I can appreciate how you would find that foreign.

Don't want to abuse that stimulation thing. lol
That's what yer dad said right before he made that first terrible error, obviously.

The years on probation weren't the best of times since I decided to follow ther stipulations, stay away from others in the same situation.
Ya, I pretty much figured you weren't just a virtual failure.

There are certainly some paths I have gone down that needed to be backed out of as they held no long term future. I don't ever recall bragging about those wasted steps.
Nor did you gain any wisdom from them.
Like being turned down for a date by a chick in the bar who admitted that she like me but I looked too much like her dad for us to repeat our sexual encounter.
Good thing one of you was sensible. I am shocked to find out she openly admitted her dad was short, bald and genetically inferior though.

Little shocking to somebody who was only 22.
You'll likely still find it shocking when you 92.

lol Hearing the same thing today might make me question what sort of father she had and if the 'looks like' came from when my face was between her thighs and all she should see was the bald-spot.
Did it have a happy face or a bulls-eye on it?

Carry on with that looping thought.
You make it far to easy.

How much mulla did going bald net him? Quite a bit and yes he did have a script so who had the wisdom, the actor or the screenplay writer?
Neither matters when we're talking about reality, which is the great big point that just went way over your head. Good thing yer bald.

Now you are mind-reader, wow.
No, I just actually communicate with Goober. If you actually attend those English reading and comprehension classes, you could too.

Don't hold your breath only means a delay, not eternal silence according to Dex. lol
That depends if someone comes along and reminds you to breath.

Haven't read much of the Bible have you?
No, just the entire thing, the Quran and the Torah. Which is why I managed to embarrass you when you claimed the Torah was based on the Bible, and not the other way around.
That sort treatment is from the Heathens of the OT, King Darius in this case..

Da:6:24:
And the king commanded,
and they brought those men which had accused Daniel,
and they cast them into the den of lions,
them,
their children,
and their wives;
and the lions had the mastery of them,
and brake all their bones in pieces or ever they came at the bottom of the den.
How many times must I say "CRam it God wad"? Don't answer that, until you take up remedial English reading and comprehension, it won't matter anyways.

In your case the lack of it.
I'll take that as you conceding, yet again, to the fact that I don't have a comprehension issue...

You said you had them right in front of you. liar.
Again the comprehension issue rears it disgraceful head. I said I just counted them. I didn't say they were in front of me. Please do try and stick to reality.

Taking away the prospect of being married certainly made her a ward of the state.
Are you aware of the multitudes of women, that can not have babies, that are not, nor have they ever been made a ward of the state.

Again that serious comprehension issue raises its disgraceful head.

Totally clueless. lol
I don't think your parents being "totally clueless" is an lol'ing matter. I think it's sad, well actually pathetic really.

Are you sure that Nun didn't have you under her skirt most of the time?
Ya, I pretty sure they didn't, since there's usually more then one Nun at a Convent. But I'm not to sure how having my face stuffed up against furry, low mileage pussy changes the fact that you said...

(insert number that is 1 less than the number of Palestinian Arabs who have been systematically murdered going back to 11/47)

The answer to that equation, is 179,000. By the stats available on the matter.

180,000 - 1 = 179,999
What? Do you need remedial math class too?

The Germans are the maters of efficiency yet they preserve the life of many Jews in WWII
Ya, they called them slaves...:roll:

SAo this place is a "3 Michelin star rated restaurant".
Again, your severely debilitating reading and comprehension issues comes screaming off the page.

You really are 'out to lunch'.
No, I ordered take out. Pizza.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Ya, I pretty sure they didn't, since there's usually more then one Nun at a Convent. But I'm not to sure how having my face stuffed up against furry, low mileage pussy changes the fact that you said...
It appears it is time to release you from being just a jackass. Under their skirts would be a form of protection from that evil that floats around them should they have zero protection.
Lu:13:34:
O Jerusalem,
Jerusalem,
which killest the prophets,
and stonest them that are sent unto thee;
how often would I have gathered thy children together,
as a hen doth gather her brood under her wings,
and ye would not!

That's what I said.
No need to cover it again then.

No, just your delusions.
You forgot ‘well researched delusion. Widespread also id documents from many nations point to the same ‘ideas’. Well explained items should make it easy to understand, no use carrying on once the ‘student' is lost.

No, that would be because I'm not prone to talking to myself. But I can appreciate how you would find that foreign.
I was commenting on a conversation between you and your ‘favored people’ that you say it is stimulating to converse with. So far it has been a few pats on the back and directions on how to rate a post. This is as bad as your ‘catfish’ bull. lol. Just kidding, hope they tasted good.

That's what yer dad said right before he made that first terrible error, obviously.
Far as I know at first sight he knew he was going to chase her down. Not sure if he could see the effects that the 1918 flu had on a baby and how that could alter a persons body chemistry once you added a splash of alcohol.

Ya, I pretty much figured you weren't just a virtual failure.
Is that for ‘projects’ that never got started or are you referencing ones I started but never finished. Having my own milk=bottle run at the age of 9 was frowned on as it consisted of me being 1 1/2 blocks ahead of the milkman and I scooped the money out of the bottles. Sure doesn’t take much to get everybody talking at once. Dad wasn’t sure if he should belt me or pat me in the back for being ‘industrious’ so he belted me much to the cheers of the crowd that had gathered. A mostly true story except for the getting caught part.

Nor did you gain any wisdom from them.
Good thing one of you was sensible. I am shocked to find out she openly admitted her dad was short, bald and genetically inferior though.
Needless to say it was time to move on so that is all I know about her ‘story’.

You'll likely still find it shocking when you 92.
Pay attention FFS, a few posts back I said my father and his father both died a certain number of days before a certain birthday. I swear sometimes it’s like you are on the first post on the thread.

Did it have a happy face or a bulls-eye on it?
She put on a happy-face and then uttered, “Bulls-eye!”

You make it far to easy.
For you to make a fool of yourself, at least this exchange is creating a nice profile of some of your personality traits. Even your ‘friends’ must have cringed a few times just on the last few pages of this thread. I already knew you are at least this low.

Neither matters when we're talking about reality, which is the great big point that just went way over your head. Good thing yer bald.
Perhaps that is because when you mention fictional TV programs and reality in the same line I figure it is about time to duck.

No, I just actually communicate with Goober. If you actually attend those English reading and comprehension classes, you could too.
He was asking for directions, is that your idea of ‘quality time’? lol No doubt you keep your lips zipped when you really should be asking for directions.

That depends if someone comes along and reminds you to breath.
Nobody has to come along, as soon as the person fainted breathing would begin again automatically.

How many times must I say "CRam it God wad"? Don't answer that, until you take up remedial English reading and comprehension, it won't matter anyways.
How would I know, I have only suffered a few of your 1,000‘s of posts.

Are you aware of the multitudes of women, that can not have babies, that are not, nor have they ever been made a ward of the state.
Sure, being from a farming center and having that right taken away when the only problem was the girls of her age (in that time and place) were assistants to their mothers before books were ‘allowed'. as it was considered a luxury if it went past having the basic skills. That was a full days work each and every day when farming is the place of residence. Moving to a city did not lighten that responsibility. Even you would rate as a moron if you were given papers meant for somebody with a millerite ticket.

Again that serious comprehension issue raises its disgraceful head.
Which is why I am about to make you an extinct wittle Bear.

I don't think your parents being "totally clueless" is an lol'ing matter. I think it's sad, well actually pathetic really.
There is nothing pathetic about either of my parents. Even my father leaving the land in the early ‘60‘s was (as he stated) the land today is dead, if you do not farm the way the Government insists you cannot make enough to keep the family alive. He was talking about the use of the chems that are in use today, to him the soil was alive and as such it needed a certain amount of attention and that included letting it have some rest. So you know squat about either of them so you should be offering no opinion.

No, I ordered take out. Pizza.
There, that brings us to the end of our last journey. The only reply I am waiting for id for Dext to confirm that his post was everything your reply was claimed it was after he has read my reply to his original post. And yes you are a fuktard but nowhere near to being the king. Dex is argumentative past the point of reason but at least he isn’t a liar.
Come out Moose hunting sometime, if I accidently wound you I promise not to gut you before taking you to the hospital.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
You begin to understand.
Actually Dex the refusal to reply was apparent on that first thread that was about the prophets Moses and up that covered the return of Christ. (so you get a fat ZERO for retaining the books that are relevant to the prophecies about the Messiah and the extermination of sin). It was mentioned several times but if forgot to register in the long-term memory.

Don't forget to give your wife an extra hug for being the salvation that keeps you out of hell, it is compassion for her feelings that make it possible.

Tell it to the Judge....
The verdict was in before the post was made. lol Didn't history teach you anything. lol
Reality would seem to be the words 'promise, not gut, hospital' are less threatening than extinction (with the click of a button". That level of skepticism is usually reserved
I think I will loop the vid Division Bel;l by Pink Floyd for the remainder of this thread which should be about to start the main feature soon.
The fantastic birth rate increase the Jew got as soon as the Rothschild puppets try to shake their image of being Satan's Spawn by doing works that belong on the pages of the Bible alone. 200 years as Lords and only proving that in reality, as advanced as we are, we cannot even build things that were being built 1,000's of years ago.

I love witch burnings, ...... actually I reserve the right to change that view if that term is applied to me at some point in the next few pages. lol Lemmings are more on the ball than this foe.
Excepting yourself judge.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Actually Dex the refusal to reply was apparent on that first thread that was about the prophets Moses and up that covered the return of Christ. (so you get a fat ZERO for retaining the books that are relevant to the prophecies about the Messiah and the extermination of sin).
Well, there you go again, assuming things are true that aren't and basing an argument or questions on them. It's mythology MHz, MYTHOLOGY.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Well, there you go again, assuming things are true that aren't and basing an argument or questions on them. It's mythology MHz, MYTHOLOGY.
Give her a hug anyway even if the existence of that passage has been hidden from you until now. That and a lot more obviously.

Lu:24:27:
And beginning at Moses and all the prophets,
he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.

A little update, the people who were rushing from the room when the words 'compensation' and 'sterilization act' were actually racing to see who would get back first with the two forms that need to be completed. In a ruling in Alberta there was an outcry from the public about even putting a cap on the compensation due those people. So as far as I am concerned 100% of the error lays with the people who introduced the act way back in 1928. The people who hold Bears opinion in adulation would have made excellent citizens in Germany in the early '30's.
 
Last edited:

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Give her a hug anyway...
Sure I will, I do it all the time, at least several times a day, I don't need you to remind me. You know nothing of who she is; she wouldn't take your judgments any more seriously than I do and she'd a be good deal more blunt than I am in telling you so.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
I was so hoping you would be familiar with at least one concept the Bible teaches.

1Pe:3:1:
Likewise, ye wives,
be in subjection to your own husbands;
that,
if any obey not the word,
they also may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives;
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
I was so hoping you would be familiar with at least one concept the Bible teaches.

1Pe:3:1:
Likewise, ye wives,
be in subjection to your own husbands;
that,
if any obey not the word,
they also may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives;
Women's Lib pretty much nixed that crap. Women who like to subjugate themselves to their husbands are masochists and would only "get off" on being beaten. Met one or two like that. Made me want to barf. Probably the product of abusive fathers.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
I was so hoping you would be familiar with at least one concept the Bible teaches.
1Pe:3:1:
Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands...
Yes, I'm familiar with that concept, I've heard it recited at fundamentalist wedding ceremonies, and the same idea is offered in Ephesians and Colossians. It's a stupid, damaging, and counterproductive idea, no modern thinking person would buy it, it makes about as much sense as all the dumb rules for correct behaviour we find in Leviticus and Deuteronomy that nobody pays any attention to.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
it makes about as much sense as all the dumb rules for correct behaviour we find in Leviticus and Deuteronomy that nobody pays any attention to.
Why should anybody follow those rules, those rules were voided by the changes that the cross ushered in. Since that knowledge has escaped you that makes your true knowledge about Scripture has a minus sigh in front of it.
Think of your wife for once, the deal is for her benefit mostly, it prevents your sorry ass from dragging her to hell since you are considered to be one flesh.

Women's Lib pretty much nixed that crap. Women who like to subjugate themselves to their husbands are masochists and would only "get off" on being beaten. Met one or two like that. Made me want to barf. Probably the product of abusive fathers.
That usually means sexual molested, since you also ave issues about abuse you probably cause a few women to gag also.