Israel's genocide of Palestine
- Thread starter Kathie Bondar
- Start date
But it is your money. While Americans go hungry and homeless your taxes and the rest of the looted goodies flow down the gullet of the Israeli monstrosity.
Hamas dramatically decreased rocket attacks after the 2012 ceasefire agreement. Wikileak cables show that diplomats acknowledged Hamas worked hard to stop rogue militants from launching rockets during the ceasefire and the attacks were minimal. It was only after Israel decided to completely disregard Palestinian rights and life by killing 8, imprisoning hundreds and raiding thousands of homes in the West Bank because they "suspected" Hamas was behind the kidnapping of 3 Israeli teens despite a lack of evidence, did Hamas increase its attacks... and now Israel's own intelligence agency doubts Hamas' involvement in the killing of the 3 teens in West Bank.
Rocket attacks increased after that incident and the Palestinian people have every right to resist it's occupation. You're tired of hearing that rocket attacks are harmless? I'm tired of hearing the bull**** argument that Gaza was "free" after 2005.
As Zbigniew Brzezinski rightly said when this conflict began:
No, I think he [Netanyahu] is making a very serious mistake. When Hamas in effect accepted the notion of participation in the Palestinian leadership, it in effect acknowledged the determination of that leadership to seek a peaceful solution with Israel. That was a real option. They should have persisted in that.
Instead Netanyahu launched the campaign of defamation against Hamas, seized on the killing of three innocent Israeli kids to immediately charge Hamas with having done it without any evidence, and has used that to stir up public opinion in Israel in order to justify this attack on Gaza, which is so lethal.
To deny that Hamas was in fact cooperating with the ceasefire of 2012 and actively shutting down rogue militants from launching rockets is to ignore the fact that Hamas was actually moderating itself.
Rocket attacks increased after that incident and the Palestinian people have every right to resist it's occupation. You're tired of hearing that rocket attacks are harmless? I'm tired of hearing the bull**** argument that Gaza was "free" after 2005.
As Zbigniew Brzezinski rightly said when this conflict began:
No, I think he [Netanyahu] is making a very serious mistake. When Hamas in effect accepted the notion of participation in the Palestinian leadership, it in effect acknowledged the determination of that leadership to seek a peaceful solution with Israel. That was a real option. They should have persisted in that.
Instead Netanyahu launched the campaign of defamation against Hamas, seized on the killing of three innocent Israeli kids to immediately charge Hamas with having done it without any evidence, and has used that to stir up public opinion in Israel in order to justify this attack on Gaza, which is so lethal.
To deny that Hamas was in fact cooperating with the ceasefire of 2012 and actively shutting down rogue militants from launching rockets is to ignore the fact that Hamas was actually moderating itself.
Right....
That's why they had over 30 tunnels dug into Israel..................and a plan to move a couple of hundred fighters across the border to do mass murder.
Good thing the IDF went in, or this fall would have been a massacre.
Oh, you CAN read can't you??
Educate yourself:
Palestine Center - The Charter of the Hamas
Israel-Gaza conflict: Ban ki-Moon declares Israeli attack on UN school ‘a criminal act’ - It was the seventh time a UN shelter has been hit in the 27 days of the Gaza conflict. The victims had all taken shelter in the schools after being instructed by the Israeli military to leave their homes.
(??? worldnews ) France: Israel security does not justify ?slaughter? - Redditian
goreobsessed: Include the links to your source or we'll just start deleting them. kthx.
I don't care if it obama's account, just link the bastard.
Wouldn't want someone to think you actually typed all that stuff would ya? :lol:
Besides, it doesn't do Andem any good being known as a lazy, thieving plagiaristic site eh.
It's absolutely shocking. And yet it received EIGHT green plusses.
Says a lot about so-called "progressive" Canada, I suppose.
Dozens of innocents killed in IDF's 'Hannibal' protocol
The protocol – involving massive use of force in an effort to rescue a captured soldier, even at risk to his life – was employed in the rescue attempt of 2nd Lt Hadar Goldin. Palestinians say more than 130 people were killed.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.608715
does anyone see how idiotic this is? they're using the soldier as an excuse to use excessive force that killed over a hundred civilians. that excessive force would have killed the solider they were looking for, so they either knew he was already dead or didn't give a damn about him in the first place. he was used.
The protocol – involving massive use of force in an effort to rescue a captured soldier, even at risk to his life – was employed in the rescue attempt of 2nd Lt Hadar Goldin. Palestinians say more than 130 people were killed.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.608715
does anyone see how idiotic this is? they're using the soldier as an excuse to use excessive force that killed over a hundred civilians. that excessive force would have killed the solider they were looking for, so they either knew he was already dead or didn't give a damn about him in the first place. he was used.
Hamas censors British journalists. Why don’t we care?
<149 comments
3 August 2014
Douglas Murray
The Spectator
I wonder if any readers have an answer to this question: Has anybody, throughout this whole conflict around Gaza, heard any reporter inside Gaza, at any time, preface or conclude their remarks with ‘reporting from Gaza, under Hamas government reporting restrictions’? I don’t watch television news all the time and so may have missed it, but I don’t think I have heard this said even once.
Which is strange. When reporting from a dictatorship like Gaza it used to be the norm that reporters would preface or conclude any report with some variant of this formula. Doing so was a neat way to send the warning to viewers that you were reporting from a place where the authorities were censoring what you could say.
Before the 2003 war in Iraq, for instance, reporters broadcasting for television or radio from inside Iraq nearly always made reference to the fact that they were reporting under restrictions imposed on them by Saddam Hussein’s government. This often meant a Hussein goon was standing nearby checking that nothing untoward was said.
In the same way, Hamas takes great care to ensure that the ‘wrong’ message does not come out. Indeed they recently expelled a reporter from the Putin propaganda channel Russia Today because he mentioned that Hamas were launching rockets from Gaza.
Yet I can think of no example during this conflict when reporters for any major broadcaster have told the truth – which is that if they stay in Gaza they are only able to tell Hamas’s account of this conflict (complete with ‘deliberate’ Israeli targetting and only ever ‘innocent’, never ‘guilty’ victims). There will be those who think this a small technical point. But I suspect this is one major reason why some surprising Western observers seem to have become so rancidly pro-Hamas during this conflict.
SOME COMMENTS
Marky_D • 18 hours ago The UK has become rancidly pro Hamas because, unfortunately, the UK media is rancidly left wing. Hamas restrictions on reporting are hardly necessary - John Snow and his ilk wouldn't report Hamas atrocities regardless.
*************************
Span Ows Marky_D • 17 hours ago I'm not sure: the MSM including the BBC and Channel 4 must have the same access to all the information available so they know about human shields, war crimes by Hamas, aiding and abetting by UNRWA, shooting of collaborators, 'Pallywood' productions, gross misuse of aid, know that the Palestinians have had Billions in aid (yes multiple BILLIONS) yet never progress, that Hamas and others in the West Bank have consistently refused peace, consistently refused a 2 state solution, know the Hamas Charter speaks about destruction of Israel, that hundreds of Gazan children have died in the tunnels, that "children" soldiers are consistently reported only as 'children', that Israel takes far more care than should be expected, that Israeli Arabs are the BEST off Arabs anywhere in terms of rights, that Israel look after the Palestinian wounded with far more genuine care, do not put their citizens intentionally in harm's way etc etc etc...they KNOW all this so I can only presume they just hate Israelis...
*********************************
Damaris Tighe Span Ows • 5 hours ago They hate Israel because it represents the way of life they've been educated to despise - a self-confident nation state willing to vigorously defend itself.
Hamas censors British journalists. Why don't we care? » Spectator Blogs
Wasn't there a Finnish journalist in Gaza who commented that a rocket had been launched nearby a hospital? Your article is moronic and not remotely accurate. Not to mention your goofy right-wing journalists are too much of a bunch of pussies to go into Gaza because they know they would get destroyed by the same entity they're defending.
So.....you link to yourself as proof of what you say??
Are you conceited or dumb?
I would say Both!
The first people attacked and brutalized by the Zionist invasion of Palestine were its native Jews.
Hey stupid does progressive, in England, mean infested with Zionist rats
You should refrain from discussing brains DaComa.
I'm going to think that when Israel publishes a vid of a tunnel with Hamas members running through it were actually Hamas members and not the IDF wearing Hamas looking clothing. Probably made just for that event and burned right after right? Posting the pic you did is a subliminal effoert to 'paint' all Palestinian children as being a mirror image of the photo so killing them is actually a good thing and parents of such evil little creatures should be killed to for creating such creatures in the first place. Want to know who is in the photo, everybody that knew and loved this child will never forget the faceless Israel. If anybody is creating a new wave it is the Jews themselves. They can cause Getmany to be boycotted when it suits their ways but wholesale slaughter of civilians seems to have been transferred to the 'who cares dept' and if killing people who are not a threat isn't a fence you will never cross you are the danger to society. Time itself will outlast any rulers.
What is the child's name Colpy? (since you claim to have all the numbers down, you will find this under the number 4 for what 'old age' is in Gaza.
Brian Eno on the Israel-Gaza crisis: How can you justify images such as this? - Comment - Voices - The Independent
Today I saw a picture of a weeping Palestinian man holding a plastic carrier bag of meat. It was his son. He’d been shredded (the hospital’s word) by an Israeli missile attack – apparently using their fab new weapon, fléchette bombs. You probably know what those are – hundreds of small steel darts packed around explosive which tear the flesh off humans. The boy was Mohammed Khalaf al-Nawasra. He was four years old.
I suddenly found myself thinking that it could have been one of my kids in that bag, and that thought upset me more than anything has for a long time.
That's right because the Arabs that had been violently removed would eliminated from being citizens of 'Israel' and the disputes that should have gone to the UN were reduced to zero and it remains at that number today. Originally there was a period of years set up to iron out all the wrinkles. In one years Israel created and destroyed 650,000 cases. If israel was being attacked today the US would be there in full force instead of behind the scenes like today. You would cheer that on so your condemnation of Arab Nations doing the same just shows you to be a bigot and a racist to the extent you will turn a blind eye to the crimes of one group but hold another group today responsible for acts done 60 years ago, and being the same morally, deficient in your eyes and eliminated would not be a sorrowful event should it come their way. That about sum it up ger?
The Arab nations that voted 'No' to UN 181 were doing what the Nations that vo9ted 'Yes' should have been doing as it was violating the rights of the Arabs as spelled out in UN 181. If we aren't going to stick to what we sigh and back up what we sign why are we signing anything at all. Those Arab Nations should have sent a bill to the UN and got a mandate to finish the operation and haul everybody into the ICC and let them sort it out. That is in UN 273, the very document Israel signed in order for the UN to recognize her as a state. UN 181 says (like you have read) that they both will exist as nations before a date in Oct/48. You can't have one without the other without being a retard.
I'm thinking you will be found to be lax in some areas yourself, the difference is I know how to repair my faults, yours seem to be getting bigger. You will find that to be sadder than I will so I gain nothing my mocking you on that point and the other ones aren't big enough to be worth it.
You just ooze Christianity don't you?
I agree that the fighters that went in to help the Arabs did not expect to find a well trained army, they were expecting something you would find at a food fight in a market that just opened. Now instead of Jews at night with bats coming through the door it war a tank shell from the nearest horizon and today death comes from above. Those events did not happen until after the end of April,1948 and that is with the 1 year that was given to settle some of the bigger issues and it followed the 1947 map before the Jews started erasing Arab villages. Since that was a plan that was 'hatched' before the end of WWI the Arabs could demand the investigation into the land grab began.
Here is the part that you might not understand, when that purchasing is done through 3rd parties and shell corporation to hid something then it is most likely an illegal act. In this case it probably violated some reality laws or having the buyers name would make it cheaper. Only a low-life would do the latter so that was their prime motive for all the violence they did after Nov/1947. The Arabs killed or deported are the reason for the Arab Nations coming in to restore order so the cases could be taken to the UN to be heard after Israel was declared a Nation and complaints were being blocked. You argument that it was an 'invasion' is a delusion you are under or it is a lie you promote because it is the justification to what is going on today as it is no different than it was in the beginning. Jews using violence against unarmed Arabs. The number in a full year is said to be 650,000 so lets say in mat there should have been about 500,000 more Arabs in 'Israel' when it was declared a Nation in that one year time frame. If that reduction made Jews the voting majority then it was an illegal election, to say the least. If Israel wants more land than the original map showns then it is rent-to-own and for a Jew to own land in that area they have to live on it themselves. In terms of reading instructing and then doing them their political abilities rate right up there with their banking abilities. (clear instructions from God and they do the opposite, some things should change over time, like the ones that are not working)
If it wasn't for the brain cavity his head wouldn't ring like a bell when he bumps into things or people trow things at him. (I would say most do both)
I once got accused of having a brain so small that if it was shoved up a gnat's *** it would be like putting a 'bb' in a box-car and for the life of me I couldn't come up with a reply. Today I would just say, 'Yep, that is correct and that ratio shows how much I should be in control of, basically not much. However I have it on good authority that the boxcar is hooked to the 'little blue engine' so I'm still on the right track. I have not quit my day job btw.
Is that the reported who died with his eyes open, literally.
Ladies and Gentlemen, here it is:
Definitive proof Israel is NOT targeting civilians.
Al Jazeera Publishes Updated List of Gaza Dead; Analysis Confirms Israel Targeting Combatants
Al Jazeera on Sunday published a list of Gazans who died since Israel’s Operation Protective Edge Began two weeks ago, based on data provided by Ashraf al-Qedra, a spokesman for the Gaza Health Ministry.
A breakdown by age and gender published on the Israellycool blog on Sunday confirmed the trend reported in a similar analysis last week by CAMERA, the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America, that showed most of the dead were combatant age males, not women or children.
The analysis showed that 82% of the dead were men, and 50 per cent of them were between 18 and 28 years old, and 66 per cent between 18 and 38.
Israellycool linked to an article published by Bret Stephens in The Wall Street Journal in 2008 about that conflict between Hamas and Israel, referring to another report about the conflict in 2002, showing that it has always been impossible for Hamas to “back up the claim of indiscriminate killing by the IDF, let alone the crazy charge of deliberately targeting civilians.”
Al Jazeera Publishes List of Gaza Dead; Analysis Confirms Israel Tageting Combatants | Jewish & Israel News Algemeiner.com
Just looking over the graph again and it doesn't even account for the 1500-2000 civilians dead, only a couple hundred... It was also made by a blogger called Elder of Ziyon using data from Al Jazera's that's several weeks old!... Algemeiner is a blog written a NY rabbi!
In an unusually strong statement, Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius says Israel's right to security 'does not justify the killing of children and the massacre of civilians.'
France: Solution must be imposed on Israel, Hamas - Diplomacy and DefenseIsrael News - Haaretz Israeli News source
Not only ignorant but using Nazi/Hitler analogies should not be welcome in Israel/Palestine debates
The figures were done on July 14........you are correct, they are old.
BTW, I know this may come as a surprise to a goose-stepper such as yourself, but the fact the figures were compiled by a JOO does not in itself make them untrue.
But here you go....facts from Palestinians........
According to the Gaza Ministry of Health on July 31, there were 1, 364 dead at that point. 315 children and 166 women. That means 65% of the dead were adult males...............despite adult males making up less than 25% of the population.
That a little more up to date for you??