:lol:
Asked and answered many times over now. If you get some help with your comprehension issues, you wouldn't have to be told the same thing over and over.
no no valid answer was shown that firing on humanitarian citizens was legally justifiable. because it isn't.
Did you see the vid "waiting for Armageddon" They actually discuss the plane and who the enemy is. It is very clear they have no intention of letting anybody but Jews have Jerusalem, right down to who is going to launch a missile that goes off target and accidentally takes out the Dome of the Rock. Funny thing is the 'speaker' couldn't remember if it was Saddam or Iran that would launch the projectile. I could rip that whole thing apart, right down to the glee shown by the former cop and his excitement on going of house raids. Be nice to see the stats on all those raids. When two cover the final battle they bring up that when God is doing things a person ion a crowd could be 'melted' and people next to him would not be harmed. Anybody that has a piece of metal in them can already be melted via the microwave things being developed for crowd control. All it takes is to move it off 'defrost' mode.
Says you. The law dictates otherwise. Quite frankly, given the fact that you have dismissed international law, several times now, on all manner of events. There really is no chance of you will ever recognize anything posted to you that is contrary to what you simply believe is fact, no matter how damning or factual it is. I don't think even the activists aboard the boats, many of which have already stated that some activists were preparing for battle, long before the Israel launches reached the ships.
The one that was followed by a question mark, several posts back. Here's a chance for you to work out some of those issues you have with comprehension. See if you can find it. It's not like it was hidden or camouflaged.
Even the Turkish military says they were justified and with a legal blockade that is also supported by following the link below.
That is why no compensation or apology will be asked for (by Turkey). The dead welcomed the chance to show the IDF some of what they would be like if they were terrorists. All the ones beaten IDF lived to see the next sunrise, a real terrorist would have taken their lives.
No I haven't seen that. I've heard it in real life from the other parents where my daughter goes to school and from some of the bi-polar lunatics that some how made it through some barely accredited bible college that call themselves "authorities" on the other bi-polar lunatics like Darby(sp) and other prophecy "Pastor Dudates" raving from the pulpit of some quonset turned "church" on the edge of town.
The boats crew were the ones taking on the commandos, passengers are not the same as crew, they are under no obligation to fight for the ship. I'm quite convinced they were looking forward to a confrontation based more on being branded terrorists than protecting the ship from pirates. [/QUOTE]
The citizens or the Military? The military has said it would accompany the next batch of boats that have a Turkish vessel along. There are rules to follow and this time they will be followed. All the cargo and ships papers could be forwarded to Israel after the holds are full and sealed. Israel can reply saying which items they want banned (via their list) and they can be turned over at sea) Give the list before the boats are loaded and then there is nothing to turn over. At sea and before any boarding give the Captains a list of 'weapons' to be collected and put under lock and key until all inspections are complete. That makes the boat safe for the IDF and their Turkish equals who would then do a joint inspection. In a less tense situation I would put a fake missile tube in plain view on each and every boat headed that way.
Any official reply from the Gov has been emotional, as shown by the passion in the speeches made to the elected members, that isn't how the military is reacting. they would be focused on the sabotage aspect of events and they won't be making any public statements on the progress. Certainly the 'aid organizers' are emotional and the issue of being labeled 'a terrorist' should be more thoroughly defined. Israel broke her agreement with the UN that voided her Nation status the day after it was given. For Hamas to be defined as the same should also mean Israel is also. If weapons are to be kept from one side of an armed struggle they should be kept from both IMO. UN181, the document Canada signed does not allow for one side to favored over the other. If retaliation is allowed for one side it has to be allowed for both. Getting both sides to stop shooting is the desired goal, that means demonizing their closest neighbors also.
