Iran's Nuclear Program

Select if you agree with the survey statement

  • Iran possesses nuclear weapons

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Most Iranians believe conflict with the West is inevitable

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Most Iranians hate Americans

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
I would say its cause the USA is on the side of good,while Iran is on the dark side.

Not from an Arab point of view. Of course the west will say the west is the good guys and the east will say its the east. I personally don't think of the US as the good guys at all, there are no good guys or bad guys, just different guys.
The Americans aren't really good anyway. They have vetoed every UN resolution that condemns Israeli acts of war and terrorism and all resolutions to impose sanctions against the Israelis for their improper actions.

The point is the 'self-proclaimed' good guys in the states are telling other sovereign nations what they can or can't do and that is wrong no matter how you slice it.

If this is what you believe, then I would say you have a comprehension problem.

Why not try answering the questions posed?
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
71
Saint John, N.B.
Please tell me what I'm missing here. The US has the largest pile of WMDs in the world. They are constantly adding to that pile and trying to improve what they do have and yet nobody here seems to bat an eye. Where is all the outrage. Why is it ok for America to continue to develop chemical and bio weapons? Why does nobody whine about Israel having nukes or Chem & bio weapons? I think it is time for all to realize what is good for 1 country is good for all so if Iran & Syria want a nuclear program or bio weapons they can have them and there is nothing the west can really say until they fully dismantle their own programs and weapons.

Relativism is so ****ing retarded.

First of all, chemical weapons are severely restricted......to say the USA has stockpiles of same is an accusation of extreme violation of a treaty the the United States first proposed back in 1968. So, if you have evidence that the USA has stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, I suggest you present it. In 2011, the Convention verified that the USA had destroyed 90% of its chemical weapons, with the last to be destroyed by April of this year.

Only six nations have refused to sign that treaty.

Syria is one of them.

Chemical Weapons Convention - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Biological weapons have been banned since 1972. Believe it or not, it was the baby of Richard Nixon, who was horrified at the idea of a weapon (biological) that could spread uncontrolled........

So, if you have evidence that the USA has either, please present it.

As for the rest, that is absolute horse shyte.

Let me put it this way.....because I own a shotgun does NOT mean I shouldn't be concerned when the guy down the street gets one, especially if he is a homicidal religious lunatic, wife-beater, homophobe, and Jew-hater that has threatened to "wipe me off the map".

Is that simple enough for you to understand??
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
Relativism is so ****ing retarded.

First of all, chemical weapons are severely restricted......to say the USA has stockpiles of same is an accusation of extreme violation of a treaty the the United States first proposed back in 1968. So, if you have evidence that the USA has stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, I suggest you present it. In 2011, the Convention verified that the USA had destroyed 90% of its chemical weapons, with the last to be destroyed by April of this year.

Only six nations have refused to sign that treaty.

Syria is one of them.

Chemical Weapons Convention - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Biological weapons have been banned since 1972. Believe it or not, it was the baby of Richard Nixon, who was horrified at the idea of a weapon (biological) that could spread uncontrolled........

So, if you have evidence that the USA has either, please present it.
If you actually believe they do not have chem/bio weapons and are not constantly working on better ones you're not as smart as I thought. It's not like the govt would lie. We all know area 51 does not exist because the govt denies it. Don't matter it is quite visible on google earth or that people go there and see it for real, the govt says it ain't there so it ain't. Same for the White Sands facility...it don't exist and yet I have been there.

As for the rest, that is absolute horse shyte.

Let me put it this way.....because I own a shotgun does NOT mean I shouldn't be concerned when the guy down the street gets one, especially if he is a homicidal religious lunatic, wife-beater, homophobe, and Jew-hater that has threatened to "wipe me off the map".

Is that simple enough for you to understand??

I'll make it easy for you to understand. You can be worried about that guy and his shotgun all you want, what you can't do is tell him he can't have one just because you are worried.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
71
Saint John, N.B.
If you actually believe they do not have chem/bio weapons and are not constantly working on better ones you're not as smart as I thought. It's not like the govt would lie. We all know area 51 does not exist because the govt denies it. Don't matter it is quite visible on google earth or that people go there and see it for real, the govt says it ain't there so it ain't. Same for the White Sands facility...it don't exist and yet I have been there.
.

Once again:


"In 2011, the Convention verified that the USA had destroyed 90% of its chemical weapons, with the last to be destroyed by April of this year. "

And you're damn right I can tell him he can't own one.........or simply blow him out of his socks.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
Once again:


"In 2011, the Convention verified that the USA had destroyed 90% of its chemical weapons, with the last to be destroyed by April of this year. "
Can you say "gullible"? C'mon Colpy, get a grip man. The USA had VERIFIED evidence of WMDs in Iraq too. You can't really be that stupid to believe everything the govt tells you. 99% is lies and the other 1% is horseshyte.



And you're damn right I can tell him he can't own one.........or simply blow him out of his socks.
Unless he blew your head off first. :roll:
 
Last edited:

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
71
Saint John, N.B.
Can you say "gullible"? C'mon Colpy, get a grip man. The USA had VERIFIED evidence of WMDs in Iraq too. You can't really be that stupid to believe everything the govt tells you. 99% is lies and the other 1% is horseshyte.




Unless he blew your head off first. :roll:

Yeah, well, in a lawless society, which is what the world is....you warn him that if you catch him armed you will shoot him....then you do. Sound familiar???

Secondly, how can you possibly pretend to know more than international weapons convention verifiers???

The Iraq thing being a VERY poor example, as it supports my position....Saddam would not allow verification, yet the inspectors still insisted he had no WMD.

The verifiers now say the USA has no chemical weapons...

Yet you insist they do.

Did you get a message from The Big Giant Head???


More like TROLL!!!!

:)

I wonder where the looney is that claimed the Indonesian and Japanese Tsunamis were punishment for rejecting Allah????
 

MapleDog

Time Out
Jun 1, 2012
1,791
0
36
St Calixte Quebec Canada
Whoever control the information control the "truth"

We have another 20 some years before we know the truth about JFKs murder,we'll probably know who really was behind 9/11 in 2070.

[Conspiracy Mode Off]
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
Yeah, well, in a lawless society, which is what the world is....you warn him that if you catch him armed you will shoot him....then you do. Sound familiar???
If it is a lawless society you don't need to give the warning.

Secondly, how can you possibly pretend to know more than international weapons convention verifiers???
Holy f*ck man! Are you really gonna believe a govt that does nothing but lie and a bunch of idiot verifiers who are just a dog & pony show for the crowd? Like I said before, you must believe that Area 51 and White Sands don't exist either. How about CFB Aldergrove? I suppose you believe there is nothing there because that is the govt position but I'm here to tell you there is a 6 story communications center about 100' underground. Funnily it is quite common knowledge around Aldergrove it is there but the govt denies it. Both me and my sister worked there and have been in it but it ain't there. Are you getting the picture yet?

The Iraq thing being a VERY poor example, as it supports my position....Saddam would not allow verification, yet the inspectors still insisted he had no WMD.
My position is that the US insisted he did. Verifiable evidence they said. An absolute positive they told the world. What a big f*cking lie! Yet they wouldn't lie about what they have in secret somewhere would they?

The verifiers now say the USA has no chemical weapons...
That they can find....
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia

Psychology today sells drugs, lots of ****ty drugs. It,s funny that you would cite a profession rife with verifiable hugely damaging anti social conspiracy to rob the public and the patient of billions annually. You trust known conspirators for most of your opinion. I will have to review your readability status with a few to adjustment. Oh,bad luck, you ran out of status five years ago. hahahahahahahah
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Psychology today sells drugs, lots of ****ty drugs. It,s funny that you would cite a profession rife with verifiable hugely damaging anti social conspiracy to rob the public and the patient of billions annually. You trust known conspirators for most of your opinion. I will have to review your readability status with a few to adjustment. Oh,bad luck, you ran out of status five years ago. hahahahahahahah

Please provide a list of the Unknown Conspirators.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
known conspirators of course refers to the convicted, of them there is no shortage, therefore it would be completely logical to suspect the rest of the lying thieving pricks

Well a list please. That way they are known.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
71
Saint John, N.B.
If it is a lawless society you don't need to give the warning.


Holy f*ck man! Are you really gonna believe a govt that does nothing but lie and a bunch of idiot verifiers who are just a dog & pony show for the crowd? Like I said before, you must believe that Area 51 and White Sands don't exist either. How about CFB Aldergrove? I suppose you believe there is nothing there because that is the govt position but I'm here to tell you there is a 6 story communications center about 100' underground. Funnily it is quite common knowledge around Aldergrove it is there but the govt denies it. Both me and my sister worked there and have been in it but it ain't there. Are you getting the picture yet?


My position is that the US insisted he did. Verifiable evidence they said. An absolute positive they told the world. What a big f*cking lie! Yet they wouldn't lie about what they have in secret somewhere would they?


That they can find....

Your contention flies in the face of the evidence.


Oh, and THIS is why Iran can not be permitted nukes:

Canada and the United Nations must fight Iran’s incitement to genocide | Full Comment | National Post
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
I'm having a problem understanding why ANYONE would support another country developing nuclear weapons. Why would anyone want to increase the chance of a nuclear war?
 

MapleDog

Time Out
Jun 1, 2012
1,791
0
36
St Calixte Quebec Canada
I'm having a problem understanding why ANYONE would support another country developing nuclear weapons. Why would anyone want to increase the chance of a nuclear war?
I can say that we all can't understand why anyone want to have so much of these WMDs,nuclear,chemical or bacteriologic,who in his right mind want to kill billions of innocent living beings?