If You Hate Ladies & Are Scared of Muslims, You'll Love North Carolina

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
If they choose their parents and destiny, why are so many devastated when they realize they are gay?

If it were a choice made from in the spirit world, it would be expected by the soul and not torment it.
Torment is a product of societal pressures and judgements. Left to their own devices, I doubt gays would be tormented by their biological preferences.
 

Corduroy

Senate Member
Feb 9, 2011
6,670
2
36
Vancouver, BC
Why should they be burdened by something they don't want? It was her choice to keep it. They should be able to just walk away scott free like women instead of facing responsibility.

You've skipped a big step.... If a community is responsible for it's children and the community is comprised of individuals - it goes to reason that the individuals that comprise the community must assume individual responsibility as well.

That is the crux of this argument - individual responsibility

There you go again. Why does having responsibility exclude terminating a pregnancy? I've asked this question several times and received no answer... let alone a good one ;)
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,415
14,308
113
Low Earth Orbit
Spirits have foresight for everything else except the society they are born into. That makes no sense Cliffy.
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
If they choose their parents and destiny, why are so many devastated when they realize they are gay?

If it were a choice made from in the spirit world, it would be expected by the soul and not torment it.
no we only retain pieces of the spirit world and past lives, although we do retain our 'level' of wisdom and evolution. Usually, we do not remember as we are but a shadow impression of our past. Children remember better since they are closer to where they have come from which is why they sometimes speak ancient truths.

We write our path to best accelerate ourselves. What happens when we get here has been directed but not written in stone.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,415
14,308
113
Low Earth Orbit
There you go again. Why does having responsibility exclude terminating a pregnancy? I've asked this question several times and received no answer... let alone a good one ;)
Because it's the end result created by an act of irresponsibility.
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
Spirits have foresight for everything else except the society they are born into. That makes no sense Cliffy.
I don't think that is what he said

Because it's the end result created by an act of irresponsibility.
if you knew that "spirit" would just return shortly thereafter to earth, then would it matter? just askin'
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,415
14,308
113
Low Earth Orbit
no we only retain pieces of the spirit world and past lives, although we do retain our 'level' of wisdom and evolution. Usually, we do not remember as we are but a shadow impression of our past. Children remember better since they are closer to where they have come from which is why they sometimes speak ancient truths.

We write our path to best accelerate ourselves. What happens when we get here has been directed but not written in stone.
That sounds like trying to describe a hole without describing it's surroundings.

I don't think that is what he said


if you knew that "spirit" would just return shortly thereafter to earth, then would it matter? just askin'
That would mean a cap on life. A limited amount of spirits.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
murder? Sorry, I don't know what that means?

you said the fetus did not chose to be here, I believe it did.

... And that fetus - with all it's omnipotent capabilities also then chose the parents that are/were dysfunctional?

Seems to me that makes the case as to why society is absolved from assuming responsibility in these cases.

yes you understand what I am saying, we have a very, very similar belief system, we can not actually 'remove anyone before their time' as we have had a hand in all too.

Although I have respect for all people's personal beliefs/philosophies, I sure do have a tough time in taking seriously the religion-bashing by those that claim to be open-minded yet have ideals that are equally as 'spiritual' in nature.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
You've skipped a big step.... If a community is responsible for it's children and the community is comprised of individuals - it goes to reason that the individuals that comprise the community must assume individual responsibility as well.

That is the crux of this argument - individual responsibility

Agreed. I accept that human life begins at conception. Parents must take responsibility. However, should they not have the means to educate their children, do we then abandon that child to the wolves?
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
Captain: You're wasting your time arguing with these
s
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Conflict comes from opposing views. One assumes that human life is sacred above all others, that it is more important, somehow more valued by god. My view is that none of that is true, that human life is only part of the whole, only a cog in the wheel. Taking the life of any living thing is equal in my eyes, and I give abortion no more importance than the cow that is killed for the steak I am going to eat tonight. Human self importance is the cause of most death and destruction on this planet. We have become a cancer on this living biosphere and one less little egotistical bugger screwing up this planet is a gawd send to every other life form on this planet. All of this destruction is based on the BS claim that we were created in the image of some imaginary god. The more I read the self righteous horse shyte in this thread, the more I think the extinction of this species can't come soon enough.

I think I can understand your rationale from the point of view of the good of the planet for the rest of its duration. But I don't think its very practical. Every creature is here for a reason, even rats, flies and mosquitoes. On the other hand man is the dominant specie. I think Mother Nature had things pretty well planned out as far as the world's operation is concerned, but either man being what he is was done for a reason we don't understand or she screwed up by putting man on the planet and expecting the planet to survive uninterrupted. It's all very baffling, was man intentionally put here knowing full well, he'd act in his own selfish best interests.
 

Corduroy

Senate Member
Feb 9, 2011
6,670
2
36
Vancouver, BC
Because it's the end result created by an act of irresponsibility.

Aha, so just let me clarify your position. You're saying that abortion should be excluded from personal responsibility because having a baby is the end result of getting pregnant, so if one gets pregnant one must be responsible and carry the baby to term. Is that right?
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
... And that fetus - with all it's omnipotent capabilities also then chose the parents that are/were dysfunctional?
yes

Seems to me that makes the case as to why society is absolved from assuming responsibility in these cases.
since it is a personal journey and we are responsible only for self, some people do choose that way...I personally feel that we are a part of a whole, if another hurts and we are capable of helping then I believe it is wise, prudent and best to do so.

If it is not in another's heart to help, it is because they are not there yet. I believe to remove the suffering of another is about the highest mark of our evolutionary journey/journies that there is. Those whom I have met on my journey who are highly evolved are the kindest, most helpful, and most at peace with themselves, they show little to no judgement and are slow to anger. They may also be of various belief systems or religions.

So you could make that case and it would not be wrong for each thing we do is a personal choice. That is why I think as Nick does, it is not up to me to make that personal choice for another, We all have our own path to walk and none may walk it for another. I know what is right for me and that comes only with careful weighing of each situation that I find myself in.

Although I have respect for all people's personal beliefs/philosophies, I sure do have a tough time in taking seriously the religion-bashing by those that claim to be open-minded yet have ideals that are equally as 'spiritual' in nature.
I do not believe I bash religon per se although it irritates me when I feel pressured by another to adhere to their system because their religion has some moral compass which I feel is not only wrong but is hateful or harmful to another's progress.

Captain: You're wasting your time arguing with these
s
Really? if you want to participate in a thread discuss it not the people in it. If you are incapable of that, then just read. If you have something to say, make it direct, if you have a comment for me i invite you to, make it.

I'm really beginning to wonder if they meant to write those posts in purple
No mine should not be in purple.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Aha, so just let me clarify your position. You're saying that abortion should be excluded from personal responsibility because having a baby is the end result of getting pregnant, so if one gets pregnant one must be responsible and carry the baby to term. Is that right?

Petros' comment related to a consequence which was the result of (potential) irresponsibility.

Your logic excludes that very important element and eliminates the component that having a child (or risking the opportunity involved) is a major responsibility in and of itself.

yes

since it is a personal journey and we are responsible only for self, some people do choose that way...I personally feel that we are a part of a whole, if another hurts and we are capable of helping then I believe it is wise, prudent and best to do so.

If it is not in another's heart to help, it is because they are not there yet. I believe to remove the suffering of another is about the highest mark of our evolutionary journey/journies that there is. Those whom I have met on my journey who are highly evolved are the kindest, most helpful, and most at peace with themselves, they show little to no judgement and are slow to anger. They may also be of various belief systems or religions.

So you could make that case and it would not be wrong for each thing we do is a personal choice. That is why I think as Nick does, it is not up to me to make that personal choice for another, We all have our own path to walk and none may walk it for another. I know what is right for me and that comes only with careful weighing of each situation that I find myself in.

I do not believe I bash religon per se although it irritates me when I feel pressured by another to adhere to their system because their religion has some moral compass which I feel is not only wrong but is hateful or harmful to another's progress.

If it is destiny, then it's destiny. Regardless of whether part of that fate involves the pressures or, described more accurately, the suggestions of groups (religious or otherwise) to do this or that.

I'm interpreting your argument as you wanting to drink from both sides of the cup here.

On one hand, it's destiny and on the other, it's a moral obligation of society to assume responsibility for the irresponsibility of others.
 

Corduroy

Senate Member
Feb 9, 2011
6,670
2
36
Vancouver, BC
Petros' comment related to a consequence which was the result of (potential) irresponsibility.

Your logic excludes that very important element and eliminates the component that having a child (or risking the opportunity involved) is a major responsibility in and of itself.

You said I left out some steps. What are the steps?