I wish global warming was real.........But it's not!

waldo

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
DaSleeper said:
Add to that a pretend trip to Machu Picchu, by a master Bullshîtter folks and and the lemmings who pretend to believe it???
Click to expand...

no TROLL - there was no pretend... as you're well aware. Again, step-up and provide the basis/foundation for your lie... for your fallacious charge that I lied. Oh, that's right... you can't! You openly admitted you can't. You openly admitted you don't care that you can't. So you TROLL and screech "Bullshyter". It's what TROLLs do... TROLLs who can't support they're own lies.

but again, lapdoggieTROLL - your lie/fallacious charge originates over 6+ months back. Again, other than being the lapdogTROLL that you are, is there a reason you continue to bring this forward, day after day after day? Is there bullshytingTROLL?
 
JLM

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
waldo said:
no TROLL - there was no pretend... as you're well aware. Again, step-up and provide the basis/foundation for your lie... for your fallacious charge that I lied. Oh, that's right... you can't! You openly admitted you can't. You openly admitted you don't care that you can't. So you TROLL and screech "Bullshyter". It's what TROLLs do... TROLLs who can't support they're own lies.

but again, lapdoggieTROLL - your lie/fallacious charge originates over 6+ months back. Again, other than being the lapdogTROLL that you are, is there a reason you continue to bring this forward, day after day after day? Is there bullshytingTROLL?
Click to expand...

Your next 'vacation' seems imminent, any plans? :) :)
 
waldo

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
petros said:
Sorry to crush your eco-rapture dreams with reality. We are still 0.5C below the 12,000 year mean .

Now what? Deny deny deny?
Click to expand...

no worries... your continued refusal to answer is noted. Your continued attempts to distract/deflect from your refusal to answer is noted.

it truly is a most simple request: if you're the one continually drawing reference back to "some distant past period", the onus is on you to draw association (and related attribution) from that distant past period and make your attachment/connection/causation of that same attribution to today's relatively recent warming. You refuse to do so... so you distract, you deflect... you do anything/everything to avoid answering the question/challenge being repeatedly put to you. You... runaway, runaway!
 
B00Mer

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
waldo said:
no TROLL - there was no pretend... as you're well aware. Again, step-up and provide the basis/foundation for your lie... for your fallacious charge that I lied. Oh, that's right... you can't! You openly admitted you can't. You openly admitted you don't care that you can't. So you TROLL and screech "Bullshyter". It's what TROLLs do... TROLLs who can't support they're own lies.

but again, lapdoggieTROLL - your lie/fallacious charge originates over 6+ months back. Again, other than being the lapdogTROLL that you are, is there a reason you continue to bring this forward, day after day after day? Is there bullshytingTROLL?
Click to expand...

 
waldo

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
no boomMan, not mad... but certainly not willing to let the bullshyingTROLL DuhSleeper continue to ply his trolling best
 
waldo

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
and there it is... the TROLL DuhSleeper has rallied his charges... the mighty Bear has been rusted from hibernation! Enjoy your denier pity-party thread, deniers... enjoy the denier echo-chamber that gives you such comfort. CUlater... in other threads! :lol:
 
petros

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,225
14,251
113
Low Earth Orbit
waldo said:
no worries... your continued refusal to answer is noted. Your continued attempts to distract/deflect from your refusal to answer is noted.

it truly is a most simple request: if you're the one continually drawing reference back to "some distant past period", the onus is on you to draw association (and related attribution) from that distant past period and make your attachment/connection/causation of that same attribution to today's relatively recent warming. You refuse to do so... so you distract, you deflect... you do anything/everything to avoid answering the question/challenge being repeatedly put to you. You... runaway, runaway!
Click to expand...
The onus is on you to go beyond 160 years. It's on record, are you denying the reality of still below average?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom