i tried posting the pic from someone elses attachment from another board. that could be why it can't be viewed here.:-( i'll try posting the pic as a link. see if you can see it. tiger woods pic.:lol:Pic didn't show up for me.![]()
there does seem to be a gender bias when it comes to infidelity, in favor of women not men. :-(The news media is terribly selective in its coverage of family or moral issues. For example, it never bothered to report ''wholesome'' Chrissie Evert's frequent adventures with men and the fact that she announced her engagement to Greg Norman while he was still legally married. She and Norman are now separated but this still gets no attention. She can dump any guy she pleases (and has done so frequently) but still retains the issue of a wholesome All American girl.
By contrast, if a male athlete or celebrity does that he is called a womanizer who is immoral.
But that's the news media's selectivity for you.
The news media is terribly selective in its coverage of family or moral issues. For example, it never bothered to report ''wholesome'' Chrissie Evert's frequent adventures with men and the fact that she announced her engagement to Greg Norman while he was still legally married. She and Norman are now separated but this still gets no attention. She can dump any guy she pleases (and has done so frequently) but still retains the issue of a wholesome All American girl.
The Rev. Al Sharpton held a press conference today to blast Tiger Woods for the
lack of diversity among his mistresses. Sharpton claims that the lack of African-
American women among Woods’ harem will have a negative affect on the black
community, specifically young black girls.
How messed up is that?
Apparently this is a joke, originating in a forum that runs fake Al Sharpton lampoons all the time.
BUT..I guess if Tiger had showed some divirsity in his philandering, he would have shown young black girls they can be sumbissive sex toys for married super star athletes.. just as like blonde, blue eyed nordic princesses. Shame on you, Tiger. :roll:
''The article I read about their separation mentioned all of these facts, plus it gave a figure on how expensive the divorces were...so you can't claim the media ignored it.''
Like you, I saw ONE article.
But where was the media circus when she openly engaged in adultery with Norman while he was still legally married?
Had that been a noted male athlete with a famous married female actress or athlete, what would the media have reported?
...and I'm a married man.
I am disgusted that the infotainment industry (formerly known as the news) has subjected yet another family to a public humiliation. Sort of reminds me of the Clintons or Lady Diana. Just because people are rich and famous does not mean vultures should be allowed to feed on their carcasses. Privacy is a right. Outside of the immediate family this is no one's business and it certainly isn't news.
Now this "scandal" has reached the point where its destroying a person's ability to earn a living.
In support of Tiger Woods and his family, I admit that I slept with Tiger too. Anyone else want to 'fess up? Consider it a vote against this sort of media abuse.
Tiger Woods Seriously injured his knee...Has to please a lot of sponsors to get $Payed$... Hope all the publicity and advertising keeps him in the spot light..(Lime Light).History Surely will..Free advertising pays as long as he's wearing his sponsor hat ...The Tiger's a GRRRREAT!...
Wish I could afford that many Women ..:icon_smile: ...Man!..It's gettin' too Expensive for a couple minutes of Instant gratification nowadays , isn't it ?..:shock:...
However ...In Tiger Woods case, the publicity makes him rich ..again as long as he's wearin his sponsor hat..:lol:
That all seems OK, for a 'single' man.